Daka and bonus attacks

USArmyAV

I've noticed since the update that daka NEVER revives herself anymore, in GW and arena. Statistically impossible with the amount of time I play daily. Also I've noticed a steep decline in the amount of bonus attacks that my team gets using Phasma's leader skill, though it seems the opposing team has a near 80% chance to call on another ally to attack. Both in GW and arena. Anyone else feel the same?

cosmicturtle333

No

Darth_Katsumoto

Haven't had her self revive lately but she did revive 3 of my squad the day after I mentioned she doesn't ever were I've my guys lol.

Fooj

She revived herself for me in arena yesterday. RNG

Pindasauskanon

Saw her revive herself today. Don't feel the same about the phasma attacks, they seem ok to me

DanTom

When I face Daka I can count on at least one revive, more if I leave her up long enough for the heal/revive.

In player hands in not sure because mine is only 5 stars and gear 7.

I still refuse to believe the proc chances are not higher for the AI. I know they say the rates are the same but I don't see how that's possible and Daka is a great example.

Skitha81

Old Daka is my fave in arena, have geared n leveled max out, along with Dooku, Maul, Kylo, Darth Sid, I'm only playing now to get Vader maxed out that's it, I have opress at six stars purple gear, however it's hard to replace Daka because her revive is crucial for Maul

President_Scroob

Cpt_Dan wrote: »

When I face Daka I can count on at least one revive, more if I leave her up long enough for the heal/revive.

In player hands in not sure because mine is only 5 stars and gear 7.

I still refuse to believe the proc chances are not higher for the AI. I know they say the rates are the same but I don't see how that's possible and Daka is a great example.

Well of course it's possible. The devs are lying imo. AI rates are buffed. I don't care that I'm about to get shouted down. My experience says otherwise.

USArmyAV

President_Scroob wrote: »

Cpt_Dan wrote: »

When I face Daka I can count on at least one revive, more if I leave her up long enough for the heal/revive.

In player hands in not sure because mine is only 5 stars and gear 7.

I still refuse to believe the proc chances are not higher for the AI. I know they say the rates are the same but I don't see how that's possible and Daka is a great example.

Well of course it's possible. The devs are lying imo. AI rates are buffed. I don't care that I'm about to get shouted down. My experience says otherwise.

Absolutely agree. The chance has to be higher for the enemy. There's no other explanation other than my own unluckiness

DanTom

President_Scroob wrote: »

Cpt_Dan wrote: »

When I face Daka I can count on at least one revive, more if I leave her up long enough for the heal/revive.

In player hands in not sure because mine is only 5 stars and gear 7.

I still refuse to believe the proc chances are not higher for the AI. I know they say the rates are the same but I don't see how that's possible and Daka is a great example.

Well of course it's possible. The devs are lying imo. AI rates are buffed. I don't care that I'm about to get shouted down. My experience says otherwise.

I'm not saying they are lying but there has to be something going on. It is very unlikely that the AI doesn't have some sort of statistical adjustment. I've had Daka reviving at much higher than 10% for over a month.

I see it as totally possible that a few abilities are bugged like that. With Daka specifically, maybe it's the whole ability because I don't have her maxed to compare when she revives me.

Joe_Bruin_420

Lets just attribute the ai proc rates to one of the hundreds of bugs that infest this game. For every one they fix it seems 10 more sprout up.

BarrisJodo

I've noticed virtually all enemy proc chances are significantly higher for npcs than players. I had a Dakka in an arena revive a Darth Sideous 3 times, then heal revive him again... while pulling double stuns 2/3 of her attacks.

MenaceTEC

Player vs AI proc seems way off.


Enemy assists a lot more. I'm betting this is done to offset the crappy AI.