I know it's Kylo for Versatility, but is it better to go for Phasma for overall boosts to the squad? I know FOST's is great too. I run full FO in Arena.
Phasma if you plan to stick with that arena team. Don't listen to these meta lovers. Then kylo, then fost.
Finally fotp if you decide to go that way.
I've tried a lot of comps and the one that can most consistently win on offense against the current meta is phasma, kylo, fost, thrawn, raid han. Trust me on this. If you want to score high in the arena with a first order team, this is almost necessary.
None because even with all four ZETAS they are horrible.
Completely besides the point, as the OP specifically states that he needs advice on which FO toon to zeta.
Hence OP has already chosen to stick with FO - despite what all the haters say (and what everybody will say in january after the FO pass in december when Episode VIII comes out, when they all go straight to meta).
All theory crafting and speculation aside ... I'ld say Phasma if you want to stick with a pure FO squad, Kylo if you want a powerfull toon for a multifaction squad.
Replies
Maybe Kylo first if you need/want him somewhere else.
Finally fotp if you decide to go that way.
I've tried a lot of comps and the one that can most consistently win on offense against the current meta is phasma, kylo, fost, thrawn, raid han. Trust me on this. If you want to score high in the arena with a first order team, this is almost necessary.
Sorry for my English :]
I went with Kylo first and then Phasma and don't regret it
Completely besides the point, as the OP specifically states that he needs advice on which FO toon to zeta.
Hence OP has already chosen to stick with FO - despite what all the haters say (and what everybody will say in january after the FO pass in december when Episode VIII comes out, when they all go straight to meta).
All theory crafting and speculation aside ... I'ld say Phasma if you want to stick with a pure FO squad, Kylo if you want a powerfull toon for a multifaction squad.