Nerf or Buff?

ThalosKirano

Almost every day we see a nerf request thread, and on a bi-weekly basis the hero trending for nerfdom seems to change, since Poe got a mini nerf Geo Soldier has been the hot topic. However, I don't think any current hero needs nerfing but many of them need a buff: Asaji, Talia, IG-100, Chewie, Ugnaught, Lobot, Plo Koon and all of the Tuskens, Jawas and Ewoks to name but a few.

So my question here is simple; would you rather see 3-4 nerfs to bring more balance to the game or 10-15 buffs for the same reason?

Darken26

Buffs - A mass buffing will bring balance

I agree. I think that every month the devs should pick about 5 of the most under used characters and buff them in order to create more diversity

Heisen

Ok, theoretically mass buffs would be great but... you have to think about what's mores practical when there's just a couple over the top characters.

Sticare_Courts_0073

Nerfs - A few nerfs will bring balance

By their very own nature, any buffs create IMbalance.

Robbathehutt

Nerfs - A few nerfs will bring balance

Slower with less damage is better than faster 1 hit kills.

Gungnir75

No nerfs... Only Buffs!!!

Can't think of any character to strong, probably 50 that are too weak.

Naifreak

Buffs - A mass buffing will bring balance

I would say the real problem is actually the damage dealt and defense of toon. If they change how the damage are calculated in this game that would fix almost everything. Coz even if they buff all the other toon, as long as the toon dont bring enough damage or fast enough to do anything than they will still be useless. The way i see it, this game is currently all about who is able to one shot an enemy first.

LSkywalkerr

Damage nerfed across the boards
or
Health buffed across the boards
or
another intriguing angle/concept is making armor/defense more viable or practical or relevant.