Why isn't Ventress a Bounty Hunter? I get her not being a Jedi because she was only a padawan. And not a sith because she was Dooku's apprentice but law of 2 would have needed her to either kill Dooku or Dooku kill Sidious. But Ventress was a member of Boba's Bounty Hunter group. That happened. No reason not to put her in the group. Also it would be a welcome addition to a weak group that has become necessary in Dark Side Territory Battles. CG, what gives?
0
Replies
Had to do it
This is also the same logic behind the different types of a single character (Raid Han, Stormtrooper Han, Captain Han, Veteran Han)
Oh ok i understand better R2D2 tags
Ventress has a "Separatist" tag. Which means she would still have to have been with Dooku. Then she should be Sith if that's the "snapshot".
I kid you not.
Also I agree. BH tag on her would be a welcome addition.
I wish I had quoted OrpheusRobot before he edited his nonsense post inorder to remove it. Now the thred makes less sense. Either way the question still stands. Let's put it to a vote. Ventress bounty hunter? Yes or no?
True story. But maybe we could change their mind with enough votes
Why isn't Ventress a Bounty Hunter?
She was a member of Boba's Bounty Hunter group. And on StarWars.com She is listed as #7 on the top 10 Bounty Hunter's list.
6 of the top 10 are in the game as Bounty Hunters. 3 are not in the game (yet?) being Jango Fett, Bossk, and Aurra Sing. The last would be Ventress, in game, but not a Bounty Hunter.
CG, what's up with that?
So maybe we vote.
If enough people vote maybe CG will change their mind.
Ventress Bounty Hunter?
Yes or No?
Moving on.
So, let's use your premise...
Ventress, in game, is listed as "Separatist". But she was only a Separatist when she was Count Dooku's apprentice. So why no Sith designation? By your explanation, that would have to be the "time period".
But rather than over complicate it. Wouldn't it be easier to say, if Ventress is the #7 all time Bounty Hunter, maybe we could just correct the mistake and add her in that group?
Mulato takes no prisoners
Is he really taking no prisoners? He calls me cool, says he likes me, and agrees with my post. But because I correct his grammar, suddenly it's just another thread on a beaten down topic. That's taking no prisoners? Is it? Is it, really?
And his screen name has 2 "L"s.
I get that. And that's what I meant by not over complicating things. Because by your logic, Savage Opress shouldn't have a Sith designation. Because he played the same role under Dooku after Ventress.
If we're going to return to the sith idea - she was never a Sith. She received very limited training in terms of the Force from Dooku.
It would be nice to see her 'older' version nonetheless. Dif toon with dif skills.
You dont challenge someones grammar. EVER. They took a lot more work to learn english you were given by your parents as a gift.
I doubt that is the reason MuLLato changed his stance. But if it was, you insulting him for his grammar caused it.
Since you are challenging mine as well, all legal documents (eg passports for a good example) have personal names written in conduct with the state issuing them. So my father has 2 passports in which his name is nothing alike, but both are pronounced the same. Internet handles are considered personal names.
I too, take no prisoners.
So you openly choose to be argumentive/condescending even when someone agrees with you ?
What even is the point of this thread?
A. You thought that you had a good idea and wanted to share it.
- Idea isn't original
- Been posted probably 100s of times.
- Did you honestly think that you are the first to ever come up with this? If so I applaud your lack of effort to even use the search function.
B. You are just craving attention at the moment.
- You did Instantly jump on my grammar, which is something only the most best awesome/coolest, and most most sharp/quick-witted internet thugs do.
I bet you are the most popular person in 7th grade.
C. You want people to agree with you to start some sort of rebellion, that in turn, will cause cg to act on your request.
- LOL.
Overall I give this thread a 3/10. Mildy entertaining, but bland/beaten/stale. I think you could do better if you tried tbh. Basically....
You weak brah.
I thought savage was a snapshot of Maul's student savage from when he had set himself up as an alternate Sith lord rather than Dooku's dark side minion?
Just my opinion.