Is it long past time that we had a "defence" for arena rather then our last atk form???

Abyss

Imo, its LONG past time to have a set defence rather then the AI using our last form we attacked with.
My fear is that this will cause less variety in teams you face BUT with all the potential teams out there, we have lots of counter options but cant feasibly use them because if we do, that "specific" counter is now our defence meaning until you attack again and change it, you have a massive target on your back due to an easily exploited defence

Abyss

~crickets~

Lol

Abyss

Stunned silence is interesting lol
Strange no one has an opinion on this haha

scuba

Meh, what dif does it make, we need real content

Abyss wrote: »

My fear is that this will cause less variety in teams you face

This is what will most likely happen. The "meta" defense will come about and then the "meta" offense to beat it.

Will make it a little bit tougher on f2p because they will need to work on a top 10 characters instead of 5.

They need a better mechanic to the battles or closer to real pvp. Problem with a true pvp and current arena payout scheme is if player would go into top 5 and then never respond to battle request and lock position

Abyss

scuba wrote: »

Abyss wrote: »

My fear is that this will cause less variety in teams you face

This is what will most likely happen. The "meta" defense will come about and then the "meta" offense to beat it.

Will make it a little bit tougher on f2p because they will need to work on a top 10 characters instead of 5.

They need a better mechanic to the battles or closer to real pvp. Problem with a true pvp and current arena payout scheme is if player would go into top 5 and then never respond to battle request and lock position

Agreed fully