So because they are wrongly stating their opinion, You want to try stir th spot again lol, have fun. Seems everywhere else that you look asajj is only referred to as an assassin , and was never actually made an apprentice,
Even the official website is very adamant that she is not a sith
The Sith rule of two was usually broken in true Sith fashion. The Sith Master would have his apprentice and the apprentice would usually have his so they could overthrow the Master. So Sith Masters would have their main apprentice and sometimes have others in hiding in case they were killed.
The Rule of Two was made to be broken.
Why wasn't Cobb Vanth shards a reward for the Krayt Dragon raid? Why wasn't Endor Gear Luke shards a reward for the Speeder Bike raid?
Even the official website is very adamant that she is not a sith
The Sith rule of two was usually broken in true Sith fashion. The Sith Master would have his apprentice and the apprentice would usually have his so they could overthrow the Master. So Sith Masters would have their main apprentice and sometimes have others in hiding in case they were killed.
The Rule of Two was made to be broken.
I mean, it’s almost like they’re evil or something lol
She worked for a Sith, arguably wanted to be a Sith, but never was a Sith.
Thread closed.
Not yet. She was Dooku's Apprentice (makes her an apprentice), but then was cast out once Sidious could tell she was getting stronger and could have teamed up with Dooku to over throw Sidious. If she's not Sith, then Fallen Bastila shouldn't be tagged as Sith.
I do have to side with the Asajj we currently have not being tagged a Bounty Hunter. The current Asajj would be pre-wipe of the Nightsisters by Grevious. BUT I do think we should have an Asajj Bounty Hunter.
Well, if Savage Oppress is a Sith in game, Asajj should be too. They were both Dooku apprentices. Then Savage left and joined "Formerly Darth, now just Maul" Maul. So they had the same position and both left to be rogue.
I guess you could argue Maul 2.0 (lol) was still a Sith during CW and didnt become Sith-less until the Rebels series. Regardless Savage and Asajj should both have the Sith tag or not.
And since we are discussing consistency here, the force require CG to remove Ahsoka's NS lead ability.
Heck might as well give Visas a Jedi and Sith tag, also.
So because they are wrongly stating their opinion, You want to try stir th spot again lol, have fun. Seems everywhere else that you look asajj is only referred to as an assassin , and was never actually made an apprentice,
Even the official website is very adamant that she is not a sith
On that very official website they state under affiliations: Nightsister, Sith. The only reason she wasn´t considered Sith officially is the rule of the two. But many Sith had a secret relationship to an apprentice they would train for the day they try to take over power and become Sith lord themselves.
It seems that the Ventress we got is her between Dooku tried to kill her and before she became a bounty hunter. Which is only a short period. They should have made her either Sith or Bounty Hunter but wanted her to be Nightsister exlusively .
Even the official website is very adamant that she is not a sith
On that very official website they state under affiliations: Nightsister, Sith. The only reason she wasn´t considered Sith officially is the rule of the two. But many Sith had a secret relationship to an apprentice they would train for the day they try to take over power and become Sith lord themselves.
It seems that the Ventress we got is her between Dooku tried to kill her and before she became a bounty hunter. Which is only a short period. They should have made her either Sith or Bounty Hunter but wanted her to be Nightsister exlusively .
The affiliations aren't a good translation for this game. They have emperor as Galactic Republic and Dooku as Jedi and Sith for example. The video posted by @CandymanJML2 pretty much sums up this thread imo
I do agree with the timeline they chose... They have her as a separatist and Nightsister at the same time which is contradictory (from what I've read, she left the Separatist and joined the Nightsisters and then became a Bounty Hunter). I think they also said that at one point they sometimes leave out tags to prevent some toons to be game breaking... I think that was the reason given for Veteran Smuggler Han & Chewie, so even if she qualified for Sith, doesn't mean CG will rightfully give it to her
Even the official website is very adamant that she is not a sith
On that very official website they state under affiliations: Nightsister, Sith. The only reason she wasn´t considered Sith officially is the rule of the two. But many Sith had a secret relationship to an apprentice they would train for the day they try to take over power and become Sith lord themselves.
It seems that the Ventress we got is her between Dooku tried to kill her and before she became a bounty hunter. Which is only a short period. They should have made her either Sith or Bounty Hunter but wanted her to be Nightsister exlusively .
The affiliations aren't a good translation for this game. They have emperor as Galactic Republic and Dooku as Jedi and Sith for example. The video posted by @CandymanJML2 pretty much sums up this thread imo
I do agree with the timeline they chose... They have her as a separatist and Nightsister at the same time which is contradictory (from what I've read, she left the Separatist and joined the Nightsisters and then became a Bounty Hunter). I think they also said that at one point they sometimes leave out tags to prevent some toons to be game breaking... I think that was the reason given for Veteran Smuggler Han & Chewie, so even if she qualified for Sith, doesn't mean CG will rightfully give it to her
Nightsister refers to her origin I think. Separatist might be used someday to make that faction useful although I doubt they plan to bring Separatists to meta level. Tags are not consistent in meaning and usefulness. And some characters can be used under these circumstance while others a just a very bad version of the original character. Ventress is still great and part of some of the best raid squads. Visas Marr on the other hand, the person who brought down Nihilus, fell victim to the inconsistencies in the tag system.
I thought She was a sith by all accounts. She was a Sith Lords apprentice, used the darkside of the force and wielded two red lightsabers.
She was not the apprentice. You can clearly hear Dooku himself say that.
Also, you know about the rule of 2 sith only. Sid and Dooku were the 2 sith when Assajj was the most powerful.
Anyone can use red lightsabers, theyre synthethic, artificial staves, theres no magic in them.
She may have been force sensitive (albeit I dont specifically recall this), but that doesnt make anyone neither a sith or a jedi, its just a potential to become one.
Being trained by a Sith, who was also a former Jedi Master I will add, no more makes Ventress and Oppress Sith than does standing in a garage makes them a Chrysler.
HK - Old republic
Maul/Savage - Nightsister(brother) synergy with nightsisters basically
Ventress - Sith
Sith assassin/Maurader/Trooper - Old R(aren't from republic or empire era)
I'm not sure BH should be scoundrels as well, scoundrel doesnt really match BH overall. Fetts were not scoundrels.
Replies
Even the official website is very adamant that she is not a sith
The Sith rule of two was usually broken in true Sith fashion. The Sith Master would have his apprentice and the apprentice would usually have his so they could overthrow the Master. So Sith Masters would have their main apprentice and sometimes have others in hiding in case they were killed.
The Rule of Two was made to be broken.
I mean, it’s almost like they’re evil or something lol
Thread closed.
Not yet. She was Dooku's Apprentice (makes her an apprentice), but then was cast out once Sidious could tell she was getting stronger and could have teamed up with Dooku to over throw Sidious. If she's not Sith, then Fallen Bastila shouldn't be tagged as Sith.
I do have to side with the Asajj we currently have not being tagged a Bounty Hunter. The current Asajj would be pre-wipe of the Nightsisters by Grevious. BUT I do think we should have an Asajj Bounty Hunter.
I guess you could argue Maul 2.0 (lol) was still a Sith during CW and didnt become Sith-less until the Rebels series. Regardless Savage and Asajj should both have the Sith tag or not.
And since we are discussing consistency here, the force require CG to remove Ahsoka's NS lead ability.
Heck might as well give Visas a Jedi and Sith tag, also.
One word "Savage"
On that very official website they state under affiliations: Nightsister, Sith. The only reason she wasn´t considered Sith officially is the rule of the two. But many Sith had a secret relationship to an apprentice they would train for the day they try to take over power and become Sith lord themselves.
It seems that the Ventress we got is her between Dooku tried to kill her and before she became a bounty hunter. Which is only a short period. They should have made her either Sith or Bounty Hunter but wanted her to be Nightsister exlusively .
I think a BH Asajj would be better as an alternate / variant Asajj (should be a new toon / kit) The affiliations aren't a good translation for this game. They have emperor as Galactic Republic and Dooku as Jedi and Sith for example. The video posted by @CandymanJML2 pretty much sums up this thread imo
I do agree with the timeline they chose... They have her as a separatist and Nightsister at the same time which is contradictory (from what I've read, she left the Separatist and joined the Nightsisters and then became a Bounty Hunter). I think they also said that at one point they sometimes leave out tags to prevent some toons to be game breaking... I think that was the reason given for Veteran Smuggler Han & Chewie, so even if she qualified for Sith, doesn't mean CG will rightfully give it to her
Nightsister refers to her origin I think. Separatist might be used someday to make that faction useful although I doubt they plan to bring Separatists to meta level. Tags are not consistent in meaning and usefulness. And some characters can be used under these circumstance while others a just a very bad version of the original character. Ventress is still great and part of some of the best raid squads. Visas Marr on the other hand, the person who brought down Nihilus, fell victim to the inconsistencies in the tag system.
She was not the apprentice. You can clearly hear Dooku himself say that.
Also, you know about the rule of 2 sith only. Sid and Dooku were the 2 sith when Assajj was the most powerful.
Anyone can use red lightsabers, theyre synthethic, artificial staves, theres no magic in them.
She may have been force sensitive (albeit I dont specifically recall this), but that doesnt make anyone neither a sith or a jedi, its just a potential to become one.
I had 4/5 Sith at 7* for ages:
Palpatine
Vader
Maul
... And Asajj.
Only other "tagged" Sith-faction characters I had any real development in were Dooku at 6* and Sion un-geared and un-touched at 5*.
She counts as an agent of the Sith, for the 'Sith Agent' quest.
Have 5 Sith at 7*
Not Sith agents, Sith apprentices, Sith wannabes, or black robe-wearing Jedi: S I T H.
Yet another case of descriptor/coding not matching previously released statements.
HK - Old republic
Maul/Savage - Nightsister(brother) synergy with nightsisters basically
Ventress - Sith
Sith assassin/Maurader/Trooper - Old R(aren't from republic or empire era)
I'm not sure BH should be scoundrels as well, scoundrel doesnt really match BH overall. Fetts were not scoundrels.