Defeat victory and defeat in a draw

Madmaex

in a draw, the GM is taken from the grouping. Thus one has a disadvantage if one is solved as 7th or 8th in a group. from the registration the increase of the GM counts no more. I got into the group with 8th GM, overtook my opponent in the GM before the end of the fight, but still lost. thus one has always ranked as always a disadvantage

Rath_Tarr

Sie müssen auf Englisch schreiben, wenn Sie Antworten wünschen. Sie können mit https://translate.google.com/ übersetzen.

Kisakee

Die GM hat nur Auswirkungen auf Remis' innerhalb der Zweikämpfe. Gibt es dort ein Unentschieden, gewinnt der Spieler mit höherer GM. Im finalen Ranking ist GM komplett irrelevant, da es nur vier Bereiche gibt, in die alle acht Spieler eingeteilt werden.

Der Spieler auf Platz eins ist immer der, der alle drei Kämpge gewonnen hat.
Die Spieler auf den Plätzen zwei bis vier haben immer zwei Kämpge gewonnen und einen verloren.
Die Spieler der Plätze fünf bis sieben haben jeweils einen Kampf gewonnen und zwei verloren.
Der Spieler auf dem achten Platz hat alle Kämpfe verloren.

Platz eins hat immer die besten Belohnungen.
Die Plätze zwei bis vier bekommen alle die gleichen Belohnungen, GM sind dort also völlig egal.
Das Gleiche bei den Plätzen fünf bis sieben, immer dieselbe Belohnung.
Und der Letzte bekommt eben die schlechteste Belohnung.

Hier als grafische Darstellung:

Waqui wrote: »

Edit - PS: Alle Werte, inklusive der GM, werden zu Beginn der Großen Arena gesperrt und können währenddessen nicht mehr geändert werden. Das dient als Sicherheitsmechanismus, um Manipulationen zu verhindern.

Madmaex

I know that. I am concerned with the direct battles. In the case of a draw you always have the disadvantage in the tournament if you only have the 7th or 8th GM in the grouping. In this case you are always ranked 2nd in the case of a draw

Rath_Tarr

True, however a draw should be rare. Most battles have a clear winner.

HankShank

Rath_Tarr wrote: »

True, however a draw should be rare. Most battles have a clear winner.

Disagree completely. If both sides go full-out defense, their remaining squads on offense may not be able to succeed in any attacks. This will result in a stalemate. The sad part is, the player with the HIGHER GP is determined to be the winner - thus encouraging the stalemate tactic.

Kisakee

HankShank wrote: »

The sad part is, the player with the HIGHER GP is determined to be the winner

..which is a genius move from CG to force people to rase their GP. It binds all things..

Rath_Tarr

Kisakee wrote: »

HankShank wrote: »

The sad part is, the player with the HIGHER GP is determined to be the winner

..which is a genius move from CG to force people to rase their GP. It binds all things..

Except that raising your GP does not guarantee that you will be at the top of the group that the matchmaker assigns you to.

Huatimus

Rath_Tarr wrote: »

Kisakee wrote: »

HankShank wrote: »

The sad part is, the player with the HIGHER GP is determined to be the winner

..which is a genius move from CG to force people to rase their GP. It binds all things..

Except that raising your GP does not guarantee that you will be at the top of the group that the matchmaker assigns you to.

You can if your GP is exactly below the break points like 3,999,999 GP.

Rath_Tarr

Huatimus wrote: »

Rath_Tarr wrote: »

Kisakee wrote: »

HankShank wrote: »

The sad part is, the player with the HIGHER GP is determined to be the winner

..which is a genius move from CG to force people to rase their GP. It binds all things..

Except that raising your GP does not guarantee that you will be at the top of the group that the matchmaker assigns you to.

You can if your GP is exactly below the break points like 3,999,999 GP.

Ah well, problem solved then.