Who thinks that Advantage should cancel out Critical Hit Immunity?
It’s all my low damage deal dealing Ewok team HASSSS! It makes them even more unviable, and Logray becomes essentially useless.
Who thinks that Advantage should cancel out Critical Hit Immunity? 24 votes
Yes.
16%
4 votes
No.
75%
18 votes
Make it remove the buff instead.
8%
2 votes
0
- 61.6K General Discussion
- -35 Developer Q&A Archive
- 2.6K New Players
- 30.7K Arena and Character Strategy
- 3.2K Individual Events
- 5.5K Guild Events
- 4.7K PVP and Rivalry
- 51K Guild Recruitment
- 751 Art and Media
- 4.2K Off Topic
Howdy, Stranger!
Replies
Padme's team auto resists all buffs when they have protection up. Irresistible debuffs still go through.
Padme is immune to fear. Fear is irresistible.
Immunity means the thing means nothing to you, period.
^ This. Well said.
Yes I understand, but when 1 buff makes another buff that guarantees a critical hit useless, then that's 1 buff that's more unbalanced, PERIOD. It's not even a big deal having my 100% natural grit chance on Ewok scout not mean he gets a critical, but instead of advantage doubling that criteria at the very least, it's a useless buff on an even more useless team; as an effect.
Let's say you had a real life buff that guaranteed you'd melt the enemy's bones on your next attack, but then you were forced to attack a blob monster.
It would not matter. Same kind of scenario here.
Now if advantage got used up even though you hit someone with crit immunity, I'd agree that's messed up (unless it was because the timer was up on the buff).
Just like they changed foresight so it didn't get used up if they were hit with an unavoidable attack.
Haha, good analogy with the hands. I’m not asking for the buff to make him magically grow hands, but to at least compromise for the 1 turn while the buff is used. Maybe, cancel out the handshake (remove the buff), or let the base crit chance of my toon determine whether or not I get to shake his arm stub. I’d prefer the later, of advantage removing crit chance immunity to balance the buff tiers.
Once again, good analogy, but it’s a stretch to say that a buff, just like another buff, would change the toon so drastically to where they become another entity (blob monster). Let’s have it to where it cancels that crit ratio and your base crit chance determines a crit, or have the buff cancel one another-out (dispel).
Crit immunity is way too powerful without another check that’s supposed to help with crits, Advantage.
Advantage is actually supposed to be a weaker buff. It's a one time use offense buff.
Crit immunity is supposed to be a strong buff. Why should a weak buff cancel out a strong buff?
Offense buffs are weaker than defense buffs in general because they (typically) have less opportunity for use.
Thanks on the analogies. I actually chanced it right as you posted to make it more appropriate to a battle scenario.
Ok, I see. Let’s agree to disagree. I just since figured that Tenacity up and Tenacity down cancel each other out, crit immunity could have advantage do the same. My Ewoks had such a hard time against a General Obi One lead, advantage is the only thing that lets them hit somewhat decently, and when every oppent has critical hit immunity & my Logray’s dispel is on a 4 turn cooldown, their damage is so ****-poor, it’s an autmoatic loss no matter what way we spin it. It’s more acceptable in fleet battles because all the ships do more base damage overall, but in regular arena it’s too much to not have my only option of dealing actual damage being negated with no real counters. All the 100% crit chance that I’ve invested isn’t even useful behind advantage, sadly. My crit damage up is just an insult to injury.
- I hope you could see where I’m coming from.
- First Order could also highly benefit from this change.
I understand, but for the Padme example... it clearly states in her Unique that she’s immune. My argument is on the basis of Critical hit immunity being to good for a normal and non-unique buff. Another buff (Advantage), should be able to cancel it out, or too take it a step further, remove it instead.
Your comparison is different, but thanks for the opinion.
No more needs to be said.
Crit Immunity should be exclusive to Fleet battles, enough said.
It should be changed to only an immunity to 1 critical attack... or it should provide 100% critical avoidance while the buff is present, like Tenacity up. That way advantage would at least cancel it out for a hit, although I think it should be dispelled, and then my base 97% critical hit ratio on my low damage dealing Ewok, wouldn't go to waste.
Critical Hit Immunity is too powerful to be a non-unique buff...it's not chance based... it just makes the rng of getting a critical hit with my 100% base toon ration + my advantage + my critical chance up + my critical damage up + not matter or even be acknowledged. It automatically turns whoever so wields that buff into a mini raid boss. C'mon man, essentially 3 different critical based buffs, all useless... when my character already has a raw critical chance of 97%???
"So it's treason, then?"
- How I feel when I have all those critical chance buffs, wasting precious set-up turns, just to be critical immunitied on...
What.
This is all just about Ewoks? So sad.
Two things:
1) Immunity means "can't happen", so no.
2) Ewoks don't need more damage. With their kits and synergies they take like 37 turns before anyone else gets to go again. (Please note: No actual math was used during this example)
In game guild: TNR Uprising
I beat the REAL T7 Yoda (not the nerfed one) and did so before mods were there to help
*This space left intentionally blank*
Pain in the butt. If GK didn't give Zarriss Crit immunity I could never have killed her or anyone else. (kept GK from taunting and her from healing).
So there are situations where having crit immunity on the enemy actually benefits you.
It used to be.
Have you ever even used them? Lmao, yeah.... the wise player would know that Ewoks initially take about 3 turns that doesn't even really amount too much when each one of those turns doesn't reflect anywhere near high damage dealing attacks. Without the extra turns, they don't stand a chance, it's why they hit so low, except for scout. I said that this would also make First order teams more viable as well... The counters are to strong for when they all they need against them, is really just 1 buff, critical immunity. But overall, the point is to let other buffs counter each other out. Advantage behind high crit chance, critical damage up, critical chance up, and even investments in critical chance/damage mods are ALL rendered useless through a single buff without a way too counter it, when I believe advantage should at least even the odds.
That's essentially only one instance which is not even intended to work in your favor. That's not the point.
This is what I see, and when you have crit chance up, crit damage up, crit chance and crit damage mods, it's all insult to injury when you gain advantage. Soooooo much for the name of the buff. It should be giving us the high ground, at least towards critical immunity.
I also agree that it should provide secondary buffs, at least for that one turn.
Thank you, MY GUY!