Is the next GAC 3v3 or 5v5?

Title says it all.

Replies

  • Not sure they specified, which worries me that they'll throw together the mix-match idea of some territories of both. Don't get me wrong I want that at some point, buit I hope they just roll out a simple 5v5, no ships and start to work on new ideas for the map.
  • BobcatSkywalker
    2154 posts Member
    edited January 14
    1v1? Come on give it to us!!!!!

    8 teams per sector let's do it!!!!!

    Just like the youtube tournaments
  • 3v5 : 3 ships v 5 toons. Fair compromise? ;)
  • 1v1? Come on give it to us!!!!!

    8 teams per sector let's do it!!!!!

    Just like the youtube tournaments

    So it literally becomes whoever had malak and or GSKY wins pretty much.... great idea
  • flux_rono wrote: »
    1v1? Come on give it to us!!!!!

    8 teams per sector let's do it!!!!!

    Just like the youtube tournaments

    So it literally becomes whoever had malak and or GSKY wins pretty much.... great idea

    Man.... He was joking
  • 6v6 with 2 leaders
  • CCyrilS wrote: »
    6v6 with 2 leaders
    Old suggestion. My idea is brand new and fresher than a steaming pile of Bantha pudu! :D
  • Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    CCyrilS wrote: »
    6v6 with 2 leaders
    Old suggestion. My idea is brand new and fresher than a steaming pile of Bantha pudu! :D

    Was waiting for someone to take it seriously.

    Both ideas are pretty rediculous :smile:
  • CCyrilS wrote: »
    Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    CCyrilS wrote: »
    6v6 with 2 leaders
    Old suggestion. My idea is brand new and fresher than a steaming pile of Bantha pudu! :D

    Was waiting for someone to take it seriously.

    Both ideas are pretty rediculous :smile:
    Mayyybe... just a lil bit. :D
  • 6v6 2 leaders actually sounds fun let's do eet
  • 6v6 2 leaders actually sounds fun let's do eet
    Oh yeah, I can just hear the howls of forum outrage over dual-lead meta teams! :D
  • Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    6v6 2 leaders actually sounds fun let's do eet
    Oh yeah, I can just hear the howls of forum outrage over dual-lead meta teams! :D

    Or dual lead hard counters... goes both ways. People complain about 3v3 they complain about 5v5 too. Saying they will complain about 6v6 doesn't mean much because people gonna complain about anything whatever it is someone will not like it.
  • 2s
  • Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    CCyrilS wrote: »
    6v6 with 2 leaders
    Old suggestion. My idea is brand new and fresher than a steaming pile of Bantha pudu! :D

    So fresh!
  • 5 v 5 but power cap limit of 100k and you must fill all five slots on offence and defence ;-)
  • flux_rono wrote: »
    1v1? Come on give it to us!!!!!

    8 teams per sector let's do it!!!!!

    Just like the youtube tournaments

    So it literally becomes whoever had malak and or GSKY wins pretty much.... great idea

    Not if you theorycraft well. You should learn counters.
  • I sort of like the 6v6 idea if only to be able to use the Leaderships that you never use.
  • flux_rono wrote: »
    1v1? Come on give it to us!!!!!

    8 teams per sector let's do it!!!!!

    Just like the youtube tournaments

    So it literally becomes whoever had malak and or GSKY wins pretty much.... great idea

    Not if you theorycraft well. You should learn counters.

    have you seen cubs 1v1 tournaments? they pretty much always win or cause timeouts
  • 5v5 with the 100 weakest charakters :-)

    THAT would be fun ;-)
    Swiss Garde Officer, drop me a message if you're interested joining
  • flux_rono wrote: »
    flux_rono wrote: »
    1v1? Come on give it to us!!!!!

    8 teams per sector let's do it!!!!!

    Just like the youtube tournaments

    So it literally becomes whoever had malak and or GSKY wins pretty much.... great idea

    Not if you theorycraft well. You should learn counters.

    have you seen cubs 1v1 tournaments? they pretty much always win or cause timeouts

    I actually find him and his videos really annoying, so no I haven’t seen them.
  • War mode GAC should be next if my calculations are correct.

    15 vs 15 one team per sector.
Sign In or Register to comment.