GAC 3v3 against GL rey? Instant loss....

Prev134
HJoci30
128 posts Member
I dont really like 3v3, but it is ok. On the other hand, if ,you dont have a GL, you will nost likely loose. I already met a few in 5v5. There I can manage. Im sure I will face more but In 3v3 rey will be indestructable, only Kylo will be beatable. Im not sure 3v3 is a good idea now.

Replies

  • Ravens1113
    2280 posts Member
    Yeah I don’t see how this is going to end well, but who knows how powerful she will be and if she can be cheesed properly with only two other allies. Rey and RHFinn are most likely a must together, but let’s see lol
  • Akenno
    435 posts Member
    Just use GL Kylo against her...
  • Akenno wrote: »
    Just use GL Kylo against her...

    That's assuming that GL players get matched up against each other. Doesn't always happen
  • Ultra
    5641 posts Member
    Akenno wrote: »
    Just use GL Kylo against her...

    That's assuming that GL players get matched up against each other. Doesn't always happen
    People will find a way. They always have been able to
  • She can solo a JKR led comp.
    SnakesOnAPlane
  • YetiYeti
    281 posts Member
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.
  • Ultra
    5641 posts Member
    YetiYeti wrote: »
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.

    Only feels unfair if you don't have them
  • Travesty
    64 posts Member
    Ultimates might be less of a factor since it will be hard to charge them up in 3v3.
  • Ravens1113
    2280 posts Member
    Travesty wrote: »
    Ultimates might be less of a factor since it will be hard to charge them up in 3v3.

    Rey’s whirlwind though....
  • Lysandrax
    923 posts Member
    Ultra wrote: »
    YetiYeti wrote: »
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.

    Only feels unfair if you don't have them

    Not true.
  • Rath_Tarr
    3064 posts Member
    Oh noes, you might face a team you cannot defeat and actually have to "strategy". The horror!!! :o
  • NikoSWGoH
    276 posts Member
    Ultra wrote: »
    YetiYeti wrote: »
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.

    Only feels unfair if you don't have them

    If you have them, it still feels unfair but you're happy about it lol
  • Dal_Zuba
    165 posts Member
    jman1234 wrote: »
    it would be great to find out if she can be beaten in a 3v3 before grand arena. hmmm, if only we had a sandbox mode...
    zq6y50vtufgw.gif

  • thedrjojo
    641 posts Member
    Ravens1113 wrote: »
    Ultra wrote: »
    YetiYeti wrote: »
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.

    Only feels unfair if you don't have them

    Which is a gigantic chunk of the player base. Wouldn’t care too much if GL’s were only matched with GL’s but....

    Would you be fine with the GL division,even the bottom person with 0/12 wins would get better rewards than a kyber in the non GL division? cause you are advocating the opportunity to get better rewards than people who will beat you in GAC...
  • Pile
    480 posts Member
    Travesty wrote: »
    Ultimates might be less of a factor since it will be hard to charge them up in 3v3.

    I would think Rey's ultimate would be about the same as she's going to go under damage immunity for a couple of turns.

  • NicWester
    7211 posts Member
    Ultra wrote: »
    YetiYeti wrote: »
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.

    Only feels unfair if you don't have them

    And if you go up against them.

    I'm at 5.5 million gp, still haven't seen one in Grand Arena. Only seen maybe two General Anakins, for that matter.
    Ceterum censeo Patientia esse meliat.
  • Legend91
    1138 posts Member
    Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    Oh noes, you might face a team you cannot defeat and actually have to "strategy". The horror!!! :o

    Looks like you already have some experience in countering Rey in a 3v3 without access to a GL yourself (which this topic is about). I'd like to hear your strategy on this one as this whole thing is gonna be worse than the Malak 3v3 thing as you could still kill the people on Malaks side and then zerg him down. With GL Rey that's gonna be incredibly difficult I guess thanks to her kit that's built around survivability.
    thedrjojo wrote: »
    Ravens1113 wrote: »
    Ultra wrote: »
    YetiYeti wrote: »
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.

    Only feels unfair if you don't have them

    Which is a gigantic chunk of the player base. Wouldn’t care too much if GL’s were only matched with GL’s but....

    Would you be fine with the GL division,even the bottom person with 0/12 wins would get better rewards than a kyber in the non GL division? cause you are advocating the opportunity to get better rewards than people who will beat you in GAC...

    How does a person that goes 0/12 in a "GL division" gets better rewards than someone from a non "GL division" who got to kyber?

    Personally I'd be totally fine with a slight adjustment to the MM system to match people according to the number of GL's they own, 0 GL vs 0 GL, 1 GL vs 1 GL and 2 GL vs 2 GL. Even if it would be only for 3v3 GAC's.
    Legend#6873 | YouTube | swgoh.gg
  • Ravens1113
    2280 posts Member
    thedrjojo wrote: »
    Ravens1113 wrote: »
    Ultra wrote: »
    YetiYeti wrote: »
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.

    Only feels unfair if you don't have them

    Which is a gigantic chunk of the player base. Wouldn’t care too much if GL’s were only matched with GL’s but....

    Would you be fine with the GL division,even the bottom person with 0/12 wins would get better rewards than a kyber in the non GL division? cause you are advocating the opportunity to get better rewards than people who will beat you in GAC...

    I’m Advocating better matchmaking. I’ve seen plenty of matchups in my own division where they had no place being matched with us. It wasn’t even a contest
  • Rath_Tarr
    3064 posts Member
    Legend91 wrote: »
    Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    Oh noes, you might face a team you cannot defeat and actually have to "strategy". The horror!!! :o

    Looks like you already have some experience in countering Rey in a 3v3 without access to a GL yourself (which this topic is about). I'd like to hear your strategy on this one as this whole thing is gonna be worse than the Malak 3v3 thing as you could still kill the people on Malaks side and then zerg him down. With GL Rey that's gonna be incredibly difficult I guess thanks to her kit that's built around survivability.
    People have been dealing with opposing squads they cannot defeat since GA began over a year ago. This is nothing new.
  • Bulldog1205
    3230 posts Member
    Legend91 wrote: »
    Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    Oh noes, you might face a team you cannot defeat and actually have to "strategy". The horror!!! :o

    Looks like you already have some experience in countering Rey in a 3v3 without access to a GL yourself (which this topic is about). I'd like to hear your strategy on this one as this whole thing is gonna be worse than the Malak 3v3 thing as you could still kill the people on Malaks side and then zerg him down. With GL Rey that's gonna be incredibly difficult I guess thanks to her kit that's built around survivability.
    thedrjojo wrote: »
    Ravens1113 wrote: »
    Ultra wrote: »
    YetiYeti wrote: »
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.

    Only feels unfair if you don't have them

    Which is a gigantic chunk of the player base. Wouldn’t care too much if GL’s were only matched with GL’s but....

    Would you be fine with the GL division,even the bottom person with 0/12 wins would get better rewards than a kyber in the non GL division? cause you are advocating the opportunity to get better rewards than people who will beat you in GAC...

    How does a person that goes 0/12 in a "GL division" gets better rewards than someone from a non "GL division" who got to kyber?

    Personally I'd be totally fine with a slight adjustment to the MM system to match people according to the number of GL's they own, 0 GL vs 0 GL, 1 GL vs 1 GL and 2 GL vs 2 GL. Even if it would be only for 3v3 GAC's.

    But the question is would you be ok with doing it if the people with 2 GLs who lost every battle got better rewards than the people with 0 who won every battle. Because that’s the only way it would be fair. Otherwise you are just punishing people for acquiring better characters.
  • Legend91 wrote: »
    Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    Oh noes, you might face a team you cannot defeat and actually have to "strategy". The horror!!! :o

    Looks like you already have some experience in countering Rey in a 3v3 without access to a GL yourself (which this topic is about). I'd like to hear your strategy on this one as this whole thing is gonna be worse than the Malak 3v3 thing as you could still kill the people on Malaks side and then zerg him down. With GL Rey that's gonna be incredibly difficult I guess thanks to her kit that's built around survivability.
    thedrjojo wrote: »
    Ravens1113 wrote: »
    Ultra wrote: »
    YetiYeti wrote: »
    3v3 is absolutely 'solved'. If CG roll out another 3v3, then they're just dummies. They can never roll out another 3v3 and have it anywhere close to fair with the characters that they've created.

    Only feels unfair if you don't have them

    Which is a gigantic chunk of the player base. Wouldn’t care too much if GL’s were only matched with GL’s but....

    Would you be fine with the GL division,even the bottom person with 0/12 wins would get better rewards than a kyber in the non GL division? cause you are advocating the opportunity to get better rewards than people who will beat you in GAC...

    How does a person that goes 0/12 in a "GL division" gets better rewards than someone from a non "GL division" who got to kyber?

    Personally I'd be totally fine with a slight adjustment to the MM system to match people according to the number of GL's they own, 0 GL vs 0 GL, 1 GL vs 1 GL and 2 GL vs 2 GL. Even if it would be only for 3v3 GAC's.

    But the question is would you be ok with doing it if the people with 2 GLs who lost every battle got better rewards than the people with 0 who won every battle. Because that’s the only way it would be fair. Otherwise you are just punishing people for acquiring better characters.

    Lol better characters, that's a funny line
  • HJoci30
    128 posts Member
    Rey is already hard to beat in 5v5. In 3v3 I dont see any way to beat her with 1 team if you dont have any GLs. Sadly I dont know the perfect sollutoin, but for now the 3v3 will be a painfull experience.
  • I might go for carbonite this time around. I just started getting tickets for a GL, so I have the relic bloat from subpar characters without the payoff. Anyone who is at the ticket stage... either ftp getting first GL, or dolpin trying to get their second, will be at a disadvantage.

    In a since I think CG wants those that spent to have an advantage, It reaffirms why they spent money in the first place.
Sign In or Register to comment.