Tie in GAC

toreado
6 posts Member
edited June 8
For me personally this rule is without any logics: In the rare occasion of the event ending with tied banners, the player with the higher GP will win. A player with the higher GP already has advantage. So why would he win if the match is not fair even before it starts? Can anyone clarify what's the logics here?

Replies

  • toreado wrote: »
    For me personally this rule is without any logics: In the rare occasion of the event ending with tied banners, the player with the higher GP will win. A player with the higher GP already has advantage. So why would he win if the match is not fair even before it starts? Can anyone clarify what's the logics here?

    I think the one with the lower GP should win. He fought as well as the one with higher GP. It is basically that the one who spent more money would win
  • toreado wrote: »
    For me personally this rule is without any logics: In the rare occasion of the event ending with tied banners, the player with the higher GP will win. A player with the higher GP already has advantage. So why would he win if the match is not fair even before it starts? Can anyone clarify what's the logics here?

    I think the one with the lower GP should win. He fought as well as the one with higher GP. It is basically that the one who spent more money would win
    That’s nonsense! Are you suggesting anyone with higher GP than you has spent money?
  • toreado
    6 posts Member
    edited June 10
    toreado wrote: »
    For me personally this rule is without any logics: In the rare occasion of the event ending with tied banners, the player with the higher GP will win. A player with the higher GP already has advantage. So why would he win if the match is not fair even before it starts? Can anyone clarify what's the logics here?

    I think the one with the lower GP should win. He fought as well as the one with higher GP. It is basically that the one who spent more money would win

    I'm pretty sure I've spent more money than the other guy. However, as you may be paired with the one who plays much longer than you do, that gives me no advantage at all - even the opposite.
  • Sarbitar
    229 posts Member
    edited July 4
    That's totally normal and completely fine. The guy with the HIGHER GP performed worse overall, by getting the same number of banners, so he should win, because he would feal twice as bad, if he would loose. Now he feals bad, because he performed worse, and lower gp guy feels bad, because he lost. So, by CG logic, they both feel good, because ... well, nobody is better. So it's a tie. And everyone's happy. What is it that you don't understand ? :smile: .

    Like if the guy with two legs had the same 100m run race result as the guy with one leg, the trophy should go to the guy with two legs because well... HE IS BETTER!!

    For real...just don't think about it. Not that the company decisions make any sense lately.
  • ToLive
    87 posts Member
    Do not throw in one pot total GP and effective GP (best toons and ships in quantity needed for offense and defense), that is used for matchmaking. In most times if you matched with someone with higher GP than yours, then your roaster is more deep and you have advantage.
    Nowadays of course it is working bad, especially when players with and without GLs matched in one GAC round.
Sign In or Register to comment.