two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
One interesting thing I noticed is Geos never touch his Traya, not ever, they only scratch sion.
Well, that's how it's supposed to be. If the Geo team doesn't happen to be insanely fast or relic'd out of their mind, then Traya shouldn't get hurt at all.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Lots of weak D teams he faces, to allow for so many solos.
One interesting thing I noticed is Geos never touch his Traya, not ever, they only scratch sion.
Did you bother to.check his GAC stats?
He has finished Kyber in every GAC so far, as have I. My stats are good but his are better, across the board, most notably his 911 undersized squad battles. That's an average of 8.4 undersquad battles per match across 108 matches.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Lots of weak D teams he faces, to allow for so many solos.
One interesting thing I noticed is Geos never touch his Traya, not ever, they only scratch sion.
Did you bother to.check his GAC stats?
He has finished Kyber in every GAC so far, as have I. My stats are good but his are better, across the board, most notably his 911 undersized squad battles. That's an average of 8.4 undersquad battles per match across 108 matches.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Lots of weak D teams he faces, to allow for so many solos.
One interesting thing I noticed is Geos never touch his Traya, not ever, they only scratch sion.
Did you bother to.check his GAC stats?
He has finished Kyber in every GAC so far, as have I. My stats are good but his are better, across the board, most notably his 911 undersized squad battles. That's an average of 8.4 undersquad battles per match across 108 matches.
Might want to re-read that
Mayyybe.:D
620 undersquads over 108 matches is still an impressive average of 5.7 undersquad wins per match.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Lots of weak D teams he faces, to allow for so many solos.
One interesting thing I noticed is Geos never touch his Traya, not ever, they only scratch sion.
Did you bother to.check his GAC stats?
He has finished Kyber in every GAC so far, as have I. My stats are good but his are better, across the board, most notably his 911 undersized squad battles. That's an average of 8.4 undersquad battles per match across 108 matches.
Might want to re-read that
Mayyybe.:D
620 undersquads over 108 matches is still an impressive average of 5.7 undersquad wins per match.
Looks like the top 10 players in Kyber division 1 have bunch of Relic 0 toons again.
Does that mean if we have bunch of R7 toons we have no chances?
That just mean that matchmaking algorithm which allows someone to "win" without even chance to directly fight against absolute majority of competitors is... well, somewhat bad. Can't blame people for exploiting this though, I did it myself when GAC was my main focus in the game.
To the og question; not for a bunch of r7s, but if you are overdoing relic levels including r7, that will push down your chances simply by the fact you will get matched with all serious players (who might potentially better distributed their top 80). I'm somewhere in between, I take care of my relic levels, but also do hobby teams and have no g11s in top 80, so only kyber is accessible for me while going for top 300 is not realistic. If I tried to do that by too much undermaning I would lose extra matches on failed attempts which already happens.
Get matched against people setting ewoks on defence
Get high score
Bestaroundkaratekid.mp4
Well, he/she does put Ewoks on D too, but still got higher score than his/her opponents. When you have less than 5M GP and keep your best weapons for offense, it's not unusual that Ewoks are among your best teams left for D. Maybe it doesn't happen at your higher GP level though.
Get matched against people setting ewoks on defence
Get high score
Bestaroundkaratekid.mp4
Well, he/she does put Ewoks on D too, but still got higher score than his/her opponents. When you have less than 5M GP and keep your best weapons for offense, it's not unusual that Ewoks are among your best teams left for D. Maybe it doesn't happen at your higher GP level though.
Yup, at 6m+ ewoks have long fallen off the map, but I have trouble using imp troopers, fo and even bh. There is just too many teams and too few slots.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Check that GAC history again. You're not reading it right. They actually set normal defense for their GP range. I see both DR + Malak, JKR lead jedi, NS, Geos, Padme + GR, Shaak Ti + clones, GG + sep droids, Nute teams etc. They are not setting weak teams for their GP range. Yet Bus 74 still undersized most battles.
When you score 1950+ repearedly it's because you carefully theory crafted how to beat the defenses you're up against with undersized squads, built those squads and single characters just strong enough to do their job, modded them well to serve their purpose and saved them for offense. Bus 74 excels in this.
Looks like the top 10 players in Kyber division 1 have bunch of Relic 0 toons again.
Does that mean if we have bunch of R7 toons we have no chances?
If you put R7 on a character that will serve its purpose in GAC with g13 / R0 you definitely hurt your chances to win in GAC. However, enjoy your wins in arenas, TBs etc.
Yeah, it's definitely hard to compete with those MM exploiters for a kyber top spot. Not impossible but very hard thx to the limitation of scoring undersized (and therefor high banner) wins when you have a "normal" developed roster that shall also succeed in other game modes such as TB.
I'd love to see 3 more divisions added on top of the current div 1 and an overhaul of the current MM towards an Elo system. Eventually the best players of each division would get matched against each other and those who keep losing (because maybe they have on of these inefficient rosters with lots of fun teams such as relic jawas) can have some fun again being matched against "their kind".
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Don't want to jump to conclusions but his 6/16 round 2 match CLS solos a full GG team is suspect. Can't find the opponent on swgoh.gg so points to anyone that can find it and post.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Don't want to jump to conclusions but his 6/16 round 2 match CLS solos a full GG team is suspect. Can't find the opponent on swgoh.gg so points to anyone that can find it and post.
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
Yep, better at GAC. All you have shown there is opponents' choices.
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
If you're getting 1956 in GAC it is because of your opponent. They have set awful teams.
Don't want to jump to conclusions but his 6/16 round 2 match CLS solos a full GG team is suspect. Can't find the opponent on swgoh.gg so points to anyone that can find it and post.
Replies
The rest of the top 10 have a variety of roster balances including several with GLs.
So what that means is that they are better at GAC than you. /shrug
two no shows and a half attempt... yep ... totally better at GAC @Rath_Tarr
We don't control opponent selection or activity but we do control our roster, strategy and tactics and he has done so well enough to win all 12 matches with full clears and probably all feats, judging by his score.
https://swgoh.gg/p/887416736/gac-history/
You're right. But we can most definitely fault the generic system in place that creates it.
Well, that's how it's supposed to be. If the Geo team doesn't happen to be insanely fast or relic'd out of their mind, then Traya shouldn't get hurt at all.
He has finished Kyber in every GAC so far, as have I. My stats are good but his are better, across the board, most notably his 911 undersized squad battles. That's an average of 8.4 undersquad battles per match across 108 matches.
Might want to re-read that
620 undersquads over 108 matches is still an impressive average of 5.7 undersquad wins per match.
Ok... math checks out 😁
Get high score
Bestaroundkaratekid.mp4
That just mean that matchmaking algorithm which allows someone to "win" without even chance to directly fight against absolute majority of competitors is... well, somewhat bad. Can't blame people for exploiting this though, I did it myself when GAC was my main focus in the game.
Well, he/she does put Ewoks on D too, but still got higher score than his/her opponents. When you have less than 5M GP and keep your best weapons for offense, it's not unusual that Ewoks are among your best teams left for D. Maybe it doesn't happen at your higher GP level though.
Yup, at 6m+ ewoks have long fallen off the map, but I have trouble using imp troopers, fo and even bh. There is just too many teams and too few slots.
His top GP amount just games the systwm more likely. Sure he plays smart but that roster isn't 'the best in div 1'
GAC needs a rework
/thread
Check that GAC history again. You're not reading it right. They actually set normal defense for their GP range. I see both DR + Malak, JKR lead jedi, NS, Geos, Padme + GR, Shaak Ti + clones, GG + sep droids, Nute teams etc. They are not setting weak teams for their GP range. Yet Bus 74 still undersized most battles.
When you score 1950+ repearedly it's because you carefully theory crafted how to beat the defenses you're up against with undersized squads, built those squads and single characters just strong enough to do their job, modded them well to serve their purpose and saved them for offense. Bus 74 excels in this.
If you put R7 on a character that will serve its purpose in GAC with g13 / R0 you definitely hurt your chances to win in GAC. However, enjoy your wins in arenas, TBs etc.
It should be called GA and not GAC. GAC MM should be with current points and not top GP.
I'd love to see 3 more divisions added on top of the current div 1 and an overhaul of the current MM towards an Elo system. Eventually the best players of each division would get matched against each other and those who keep losing (because maybe they have on of these inefficient rosters with lots of fun teams such as relic jawas) can have some fun again being matched against "their kind".
Don't want to jump to conclusions but his 6/16 round 2 match CLS solos a full GG team is suspect. Can't find the opponent on swgoh.gg so points to anyone that can find it and post.
https://swgoh.gg/p/544923796/characters/
Dont think that is it. Shows a different opponent on 6/16 round 2. I checked about 20 different Delara Exibil accounts and couldn't find the match up