When will you fix Wat and JMLS interaction?

SurvivorM

It's obviously bugged. When exactly you gonna fix it?

DonPuto

No it's not

SurvivorM

Well, judging how it wotks - that extra protection should be nullified by SEE. But it's not
So it's either shohldn't regen or should be nullified, obviously not happening now. It is bugged, 100%

BioHazard

Are you referring to the protection up granted by Bastila lead? Because to my knowledge, protection up is independent from the protection bar, but can still be recovered by the conventional ways of recovering protection (ie. Wat's Shield Generator). It is a bit of a confusing interaction, but as far as I know, it isn't a bug.

SurvivorM

It can't be "regen - yes, nullify - no" mechanics. Either both or none of

SurvivorM

BioHazard wrote: »

Are you referring to the protection up granted by Bastila lead? Because to my knowledge, protection up is independent from the protection bar, but can still be recovered by the conventional ways of recovering protection (ie. Wat's Shield Generator). It is a bit of a confusing interaction, but as far as I know, it isn't a bug.

If it regens and considered as "max protection" - it should be nullified by SEE as well

BioHazard

The language isn't "nullify" though, it is "lose max protection." If you are still certain that it is a bug, why not report it through the "bug report" tab on the forums?

SurvivorM

Linked JMLS should lose 80%of all the protection, including protection up, or shouldn't regen protection up at all. This should be fixed

BioHazard

Report it then. You are calling it a bug, so report it as one.

Kyno

SurvivorM wrote: »

Linked JMLS should lose 80%of all the protection, including protection up, or shouldn't regen protection up at all. This should be fixed

You can report this if you want, but there is no point in waiting for a fix, at least not right now, as this is WAI, and not a bug.

InyakSolomon88

SurvivorM wrote: »

Linked JMLS should lose 80%of all the protection, including protection up, or shouldn't regen protection up at all. This should be fixed

pretty sure Devs already pointed out that protection up is not the same as regenerating protection.

Kyno

InyakSolomon88 wrote: »

SurvivorM wrote: »

Linked JMLS should lose 80%of all the protection, including protection up, or shouldn't regen protection up at all. This should be fixed

pretty sure Devs already pointed out that protection up is not the same as regenerating protection.

Correct. This was introduced with Nest, I believe.