A suggestion for misleading bundle graphics

SifuSteve

I haven't fallen foul of this for a while but having recently felt like I'd been scammed, I would like to make a polite recommendation to prevent any more ill will. Here's an example:

The Relic Advancement Bundle shows graphics of the following:

Fragmented Signal Data: 15-150
Incomplete Signal Data: 10-130
Carbonite Circuit Board: 40-320
Bronzium Wiring: 40-320
Chromium Transistor: 25-180
Flawed Signal Data: 7-30
Aurodium Heatsink: 10-40

Based on that, I would expect as a minimum, to get the minimum number of each. This is common to most of the (many) packs I buy and is completely reasonable. However, scrolling down on the description lists the actual payouts. Some of those include 0 of a particular component.

Therefore, with packs such as these I would suggest that if there is a chance of a 0 payout of a component, that it is shown on the graphics and count i.e.

Fragmented Signal Data: 15-150
Incomplete Signal Data: 10-130
Carbonite Circuit Board: 40-320
Bronzium Wiring: 40-320
Chromium Transistor: 25-180
Flawed Signal Data: 0-30
Aurodium Heatsink: 0-40

This will allow potential buyers to immediately understand the value of their gambling stake and prevent the complaints team having to continue to ignore any cases where players claim to not have received their items.