in the name of the Maker...please GvG tournaments!

reizse

pretty please with a toydarian on top?

cosmicturtle333

I hope this is the next major update, after Raids.

ElSoldado_23

+1

reizse

i'd like to see how guilds and raids are implemented before they roll out any form of gvg, but i imagine it could be a week long event where each day, guilds face off against each other where the guild score is determined by number of wins in individual player vs ai, just like arena.

ElSoldado_23

reizse wrote: »

i'd like to see how guilds and raids are implemented before they roll out any form of gvg, but i imagine it could be a week long event where each day, guilds face off against each other where the guild score is determined by number of wins in individual player vs ai, just like arena.

I've played a CG that has that type of GvG tournaments. The ranking is not perfect in the beginning but a day or two it almost becomes perfect were guilds would fight other guilds in the same power or rank. They could do it here but would like the tournaments to last longer than a day for better matchmaking and also allow rematches against other guilds.

Rogan_Ban84

+1

I like it and makes sense.

J0K3R

Please.. For the love of what is good... No guild vs guild

Casual_Player

J0K3R wrote: »

Please.. For the love of what is good... No guild vs guild

+1

CPMP

J0K3R wrote: »

Please.. For the love of what is good... No guild vs guild

+1
....If i want guild activities i may aswell go back to WoW.

cosmicturtle333

CPMP wrote: »

J0K3R wrote: »

Please.. For the love of what is good... No guild vs guild

+1
....If i want guild activities i may aswell go back to WoW.

K bye

KingAbuse

Guild vs Guild? +1 and slip a prawn on da barbie!

Zetto

There's already PvP Arena. Now you also want GvG too? That's too much work.

President_Scroob

J0K3R wrote: »

Please.. For the love of what is good... No guild vs guild

Why? SWFC does it with legion at war and its the best part of the game

Zetto

President_Scroob wrote: »

Why? SWFC does it with legion at war and its the best part of the game

This is not SWFC, there's already plenty of competition in the arena, no need to make it even more intensive with GvG. If anything, GvG must be about COOP, not VERSUS, to make this game more balanced and enjoyable.

Telaan

Zetto wrote: »

President_Scroob wrote: »

Why? SWFC does it with legion at war and its the best part of the game

This is not SWFC, there's already plenty of competition in the arena, no need to make it even more intensive with GvG. If anything, GvG must be about COOP, not VERSUS, to make this game more balanced and enjoyable.

Why must it be coop to make it balanced and enjoyable? Because this isn't SWFC this game can't have a similar event? As he said LAW is the single best part about that game; and they also have solo leader boards. I too hope an event similar to LAW is implemented.

reizse

well there's a thread with some datamined info about guild tournaments. i wouldn't read too much into it, but that's still some exciting 'news'

J0K3R

Can someone explain how rewards work in other games that have G v G? Do the more powerful guilds dominate resources?

That was my exp in a game, and y im against it. It literally killed the game and ppl quit en masse. Maybe the developer, r2games, just developed their GvG poorly.

Plz give a detailed example of positive resource sharing in a GvG format where the weak (casual/solo) guilds dont suffer

Powda

Guild v Guild will always swing the game in one of two directions...

1. The game alienates the casual / solo player and turns into a P2P(P2W) model
2. The game implodes completely.

EA would have to do something significantly different to avoid having this game fall into either of those categories...

If their current track record of swinging meta shifts and not-ready-for-release updates is any indication, I'm not crazily optimistic.

Nikoms565

I'm okay with guilds and guild activities becoming part of the game - I don't think they should become the focus though.

It would seem odd to attract a player base to a game primarily focused on individual achievements/accomplishments for 4-5 months, then change to a guild-focused game. Especially because some were attracted to the game initially because it didn't have too many PvP, GvG, player inter-dependency aspects.

J0K3R

Nikoms565 wrote: »

I'm okay with guilds and guild activities becoming part of the game - I don't think they should become the focus though.

It would seem odd to attract a player base to a game primarily focused on individual achievements/accomplishments for 4-5 months, then change to a guild-focused game. Especially because some were attracted to the game initially because it didn't have too many PvP, GvG, player inter-dependency aspects.

Yes sir.

Powda

J0K3R wrote: »

Nikoms565 wrote: »

I'm okay with guilds and guild activities becoming part of the game - I don't think they should become the focus though.

It would seem odd to attract a player base to a game primarily focused on individual achievements/accomplishments for 4-5 months, then change to a guild-focused game. Especially because some were attracted to the game initially because it didn't have too many PvP, GvG, player inter-dependency aspects.

Yes sir.

+1

CPMP

Nikoms565 wrote: »

I'm okay with guilds and guild activities becoming part of the game - I don't think they should become the focus though.

It would seem odd to attract a player base to a game primarily focused on individual achievements/accomplishments for 4-5 months, then change to a guild-focused game. Especially because some were attracted to the game initially because it didn't have too many PvP, GvG, player inter-dependency aspects.

Exactly my thoughts.
Who would have guessed that a game that called "Galaxy of heroes" would have 90% useless heroes and have guilds as main focus....

Cyclops

Coll