For me...I can't shoot layups.
I know based on the board that he's not going to clear my defense and they're not going to clear mine, but I can't help it. Every time I plan for a full clear and sloppily take down something that I should have easily cleared.
I lose that match every single time. Down 2 I'm going for the 3.
I underestimate Night Sisters and I overestimate Geos too often by using either too much of a team of too little causing me lost banners.
Nothing in your recent GAC history resembles your claim.
Please note that doesn't mean that I am losing all time, my last rounds were like 1:2, 2:1, 2:1, 2:1.
It does mean though, that I can't properly analyze my lost matches, simply because the large disparity is overshadowing everything.
Most probably I do a lot of things right, otherwise I would not eek out a single win, but like I said it is difficult for me to really understand if and when I made poor decisions.
@DarjeloSalas voila: https://swgoh.gg/p/142831613/ so that you can check
my own GP is 3.8m
in last round I had following opponents:
5.8m GP - loss, 3.0m GP - win, 6.8m GP - win
In the previous round I had following opponents
6.4m GP - loss, 5.6m GP - win, 5.8m GP - win
that is certainly within the range of 1m-3m more GP than I have on average
Can you please provide some data to prove your claim that the lower GP players frequently win. That is a bold claim. I say it is the opposite. The lower GP players are at a disadvantage and most likely lose way more often in these mismatches. So please prove your words.
Moreover mismatches don't just happen, they are regular occurrences. Regular.
I’ll provide proof of lower GP frequently winning when you provide proof that these are regular occurrences
Easy, a short search just in this very forum provides with me a large number of hits if I look for posts about players reporting about their GP mismatches. Given that this forum represents only a small subset of all players we can assume that the real number of GP mismatches is hence much larger. This qualifies for regular occurrences.
How can something like this even be slighty seen as ok?
A short search on this forum sees many people saying that they keep getting matched with people with 1M+ more GP. If it keeps happening, they must win some of those matchups to keep being matched with much bigger rosters.
Bear in mind I said that the lower GP player frequently wins. I think you’ve picked that up as me saying they win more often than not - which is not what I’m saying.
Or they keep being matched up with players that don't belong where the smaller players are? You only see one side... one must be too good/win enough to be matched with bigger players. That's the theory, the reality looks quite different. Enough players in lower divisions/ leagues where they don't belong. Not to mention a win that promotes players just because the opponent didn't show.
In reality, what happens is these huge rosters fall to the bottom, where I'm at, and then they play. So no, I don't have to ever win to play against them because there's nowhere lower for me to go.
The term frequently is exactly implying more often than not. If that is not what you wanted to say, then maybe change your statement to sometimes. Sometimes the lower GP player wins in a mismatched GAC pairing, but certainly not more often than not.
My weakness is for mince pies & sherry but as far as GAC goes it’s probably over relying on Revan to counter Grievous teams & not having enough good alternatives
Now comes the interesting part, I would like to become better on my current level of historical time and efforts spent. However by continiously being matched to accounts with more resources available (that is the meaning of GP game wise) I have no chance to analyse my gameplay. Did i lose, because i did a real mistake or did I simply never had a chance unless my opponent was not playing? This constant mismatching makes analysing your own game impossible and that is my GAC weakness, I will likely do the same mistakes for a long period of time, because I don't recognise them as mistakes
I think I get your drift, Sport - but what you’re describing is objective conditions. It can’t be a weakness because it’s the same for everyone. How can a higher roster player know if what they’re doing is any good if they only beat lower roster players? Objective conditions are only a weakness if we start interpreting them subjectively (eg “this isn’t fair… why do I always end up against…” etc). Weaknesses only ever sit within ourselves. The biggest one is probably caring about outcomes. As the Hagakuri says, life is just a headlong dash to an irrational death. Trick is to grab as many mince pies as you can on the way.
That's my main account. My alt account is what I was talking about. Sorry for the confusion.
My motivation on 3v3.
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
You're mixing it with the games weakness to require units that i dislike to even own to participate in certain activities.
- Grand Admiral Thrawn