A little less than 113 Million GP. We got 40 stars but that's cause we goofed on one phase. 41 stars is definitely our limit without a 7mil boast. Leaders did the math already.
For now I'm getting a base of 5 stars plus roughly GP/3.
Actual data is Slope 0.347 and Intercept 5.12. At over 117 samples, this is becoming a very robust result. And this is the current graph of the data:
As you can see, it looks like straight line up to 40 stars or so. 40/41 seems a ceiling. But may be next run with the lessons learned and more discipline we could see even higher numbers!
89 million , 35 stars. Should have gotten 38 with better understanding/communication, and upgrading members after dropping dead weight should get close to 40
We had 50m GP and managed 23 stars this time. We lost out on 1 or 2 stars due to people not participating or not following instructions. It's like herding cats, man....
What I'm getting is that, assuming decent effort, you couldn't really do much better then what your guild GP could provide. Guild GP over 6 phases would seem to be THE determining factor. Which is probably one big vote that we all spent a lot of time on something that would probably have resolved itself without much time put into it.
There were almost no extreme outliers. Seems also like it's another invite to rip up guilds since no matter how hard you try you can't do much better in TB, might as well just join a guild that will see you through.
Also, at the end of the spectrum is seem like it tails off. An Increased amount of GP is going to be needed to get each star from 41-45 over what was needed prior.
Really, I'd have wished to see a graph that was more random. This is disappointing.
Replies
For now I'm getting a base of 5 stars plus roughly GP/3.
Actual data is Slope 0.347 and Intercept 5.12. At over 117 samples, this is becoming a very robust result. And this is the current graph of the data:
As you can see, it looks like straight line up to 40 stars or so. 40/41 seems a ceiling. But may be next run with the lessons learned and more discipline we could see even higher numbers!
Thanks to @J7Luke for his spreadsheet (I did mine and got same results!!).
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L6HOk5N6RfK8RMwhe9T_QtwmZH7SFPjiZatSGpQg_rw/edit#gid=0
33* and 80.710.000
http://swgoh.gg/u/lightsabre/
Discord - LightSabre#6186
Our data is 28 stars at 74M GP.
27 stars.
What I'm getting is that, assuming decent effort, you couldn't really do much better then what your guild GP could provide. Guild GP over 6 phases would seem to be THE determining factor. Which is probably one big vote that we all spent a lot of time on something that would probably have resolved itself without much time put into it.
There were almost no extreme outliers. Seems also like it's another invite to rip up guilds since no matter how hard you try you can't do much better in TB, might as well just join a guild that will see you through.
Also, at the end of the spectrum is seem like it tails off. An Increased amount of GP is going to be needed to get each star from 41-45 over what was needed prior.
Really, I'd have wished to see a graph that was more random. This is disappointing.
We are already reviewing the low performers and will swap them out. Hoping to get 41 next run or 42 if we are really lucky