Oh, sweet jebus. I did assign her. I always do. That was just a joke. It’s not about rose. Still not about rose. Even after the next rose comment it won’t be about rose.
Allowing you to place more than 10 toons in platoons would not suddenly erase the guild aspect of tb. It would reward those with bigger stables and help those who are still building.
Oh, sweet jebus. I did assign her. I always do. That was just a joke. It’s not about rose. Still not about rose. Even after the next rose comment it won’t be about rose.
Allowing you to place more than 10 toons in platoons would not suddenly erase the guild aspect of tb. It would reward those with bigger stables and help those who are still building.
Should I quote myself? Nah. Lessons learned: 🌹 1st, forums last.
I read all of your posts. Allowing one person to fill, say, 40 slots totally eliminates equal participation. The people who can’t fill as many slots probably are already not doing as well with the platoons. If that answer doesn’t satisfy you, ask EA directly. They probably have a better answer about why it promotes teamwork.
Replies
Assign her first?
So, why didn't you assign her - or any other rare character - before reaching the 10-per-player-per-zone cap?
The total is 90 per zone. Having a max-per-player is fine. It is a guild event after all.
Allowing you to place more than 10 toons in platoons would not suddenly erase the guild aspect of tb. It would reward those with bigger stables and help those who are still building.
The answer to your complaint: Because TB is a guild activity, not like raids where one person shows off their collection.
I read all of your posts. Allowing one person to fill, say, 40 slots totally eliminates equal participation. The people who can’t fill as many slots probably are already not doing as well with the platoons. If that answer doesn’t satisfy you, ask EA directly. They probably have a better answer about why it promotes teamwork.