Honestly I dont understand why Sith are deemed as bad and Jedi are deemed good.
(DS / LS)
I mean Jedi are honestly just kidnappers and physcopaths.
I mean the Jedi temple just held kids with magic imprisoned. Which, Jedi used their powers to navigate and kidnap from their families.
I mean look at yoda.
And Sith are ex-jedi and are honestly just "woke" jedi who look like they're bad but are only trying to get revenge on the kidnapping jedi.
(Give Sith LS tag they're good people.)
This should take peoples mind of the dumpster fi- *ahem* I mean SWGOH debacle for a bit (:
1
Replies
Jedi are the lesser of 2 evils here and all things being relative that alone could make them different ends of the spectrum. LS and DS
I also hate how people say the rebels were the good guys, most of the civilians viewed them as terrorists. They were responsible for thousands of civilian deaths and committed many of the same war crimes that the empire committed. So why are they seem as the "good guys" when the empire brought stability and relative peace.
This.
It is also one of the parallels between the Rebels/Empire and Resistance/FO. Rebels were the terrorists fighting against the regime, whereas the Resistance were in power with the New Republic, and the FO were the terrorists fighting against democracy and freedom.
Actually, they helped get rid of slavery for the most part. As you'll recall from one of the true canon sources, The Clone Wars, slavery had be pretty much taken care of in the mid-rim until the Clone Wars began, as seen in the episode where Anakin becomes a slave.
Also, the Empire brought "peace and stability" the same way China does: through a totalitarian regime that had incredibly severe punishments for any who disobeyed. it's the same argument as always: freedom vs. security.
So china vs murica
SW predicted the future O:
U predicted my joke O: