You can probably figure it out from the context and the words.
@TVF I can't, so I need you to explicitly tell me, so that way I can make an assessment as to whether or not I've been insulted. Then I can tell a moderator about it. This is the precedent you've set, so you should adhere to it.
You can probably figure it out from the context and the words.
@TVF I can't, so I need you to explicitly tell me, so that way I can make an assessment as to whether or not I've been insulted. Then I can tell a moderator about it. This is the precedent you've set, so you should adhere to it.
I guess by the technical definition of "civil disobedience" you used it correctly. However it is generally used in a way to enact a greater good, and you're fooling yourself if you think that's what it is accomplishing. All it is doing is punishing people who have nothing to do with the system being set up how it is set up.
If you think that means I'm insulting you, I guess report me to a moderator. My point is that you think it's accomplishing something good, when in fact it's doing the opposite.
You can probably figure it out from the context and the words.
@TVF I can't, so I need you to explicitly tell me, so that way I can make an assessment as to whether or not I've been insulted. Then I can tell a moderator about it. This is the precedent you've set, so you should adhere to it.
I guess by the technical definition of "civil disobedience" you used it correctly. However it is generally used in a way to enact a greater good, and you're fooling yourself if you think that's what it is accomplishing. All it is doing is punishing people who have nothing to do with the system being set up how it is set up.
If you think that means I'm insulting you, I guess report me to a moderator. My point is that you think it's accomplishing something good, when in fact it's doing the opposite.
This made a lot more sense than "Not Hero". Thanks for clarifying.
Easy decision for me - go full def to spoil someones dreams of Kyber and never attack cuz rewards are garbage, gonna spend that hour better than on SWGOH
Sweet, with that free hour you can try to run over some kid's pet, surely that will ruin his day and bring you some sort of joy.
Easy decision for me - go full def to spoil someones dreams of Kyber and never attack cuz rewards are garbage, gonna spend that hour better than on SWGOH
I do however also think going full def is bad. I don't see any logical reason why it would be a good thing to go full def. The way i read your comment you seem suprised that i consider going full def is a bad thing, which in term is suprising to me. Care to elaborate?
Or maybe it's just that we have different definitions of going full def. To potentially clear that up, full def as in placing your best teams on defence.
I prefer a balance between O and D because O is more fun, but Heavy D is a valid strategy. I have used it and pulled a win where I probably should have lost. I see no problem at all with it. It's surprising to me that anyone would take exception to a strong D.
I may go heavy D if I feel my opponent has a particular squad I cannot beat. If that team shows up on D then my O is crippled anyway so this may be my best shot. Take what points I can scrape together, maybe it will be enough. If the opposition goes with heavy O then their D will be light, so my light O has a better chance of scoring points and again my heavy D is still my best shot at winning.
Matchup looks unfavorable? Give 'em the D, make them earn it.
Easy decision for me - go full def to spoil someones dreams of Kyber and never attack cuz rewards are garbage, gonna spend that hour better than on SWGOH
Sweet, with that free hour you can try to run over some kid's pet, surely that will ruin his day and bring you some sort of joy.
Easy decision for me - go full def to spoil someones dreams of Kyber and never attack cuz rewards are garbage, gonna spend that hour better than on SWGOH
I do however also think going full def is bad. I don't see any logical reason why it would be a good thing to go full def. The way i read your comment you seem suprised that i consider going full def is a bad thing, which in term is suprising to me. Care to elaborate?
Or maybe it's just that we have different definitions of going full def. To potentially clear that up, full def as in placing your best teams on defence.
I prefer a balance between O and D because O is more fun, but Heavy D is a valid strategy. I have used it and pulled a win where I probably should have lost. I see no problem at all with it. It's surprising to me that anyone would take exception to a strong D.
I may go heavy D if I feel my opponent has a particular squad I cannot beat. If that team shows up on D then my O is crippled anyway so this may be my best shot. Take what points I can scrape together, maybe it will be enough. If the opposition goes with heavy O then their D will be light, so my light O has a better chance of scoring points and again my heavy D is still my best shot at winning.
Matchup looks unfavorable? Give 'em the D, make them earn it.
There's a difference between setting a strong defense and going full defense, especially if you're just going full def to annoy your opponent.
Setting a strong defense is a viable strategy which could lead to a win, i see nothing wrong with that either.
Replies
Only if you believe the forums.
I'm so smart.
I believe the word is anti-hero, or perhaps antagonist.
Anti hero implies that they are on the side against the heroes. One can be a Not Hero, without being an anti hero. They can be neither.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koJlIGDImiU
@TVF I can't, so I need you to explicitly tell me, so that way I can make an assessment as to whether or not I've been insulted. Then I can tell a moderator about it. This is the precedent you've set, so you should adhere to it.
I guess by the technical definition of "civil disobedience" you used it correctly. However it is generally used in a way to enact a greater good, and you're fooling yourself if you think that's what it is accomplishing. All it is doing is punishing people who have nothing to do with the system being set up how it is set up.
If you think that means I'm insulting you, I guess report me to a moderator. My point is that you think it's accomplishing something good, when in fact it's doing the opposite.
This made a lot more sense than "Not Hero". Thanks for clarifying.
Did I use it right in a sectence?
Yeah, but you spelled sentence wrong. So close!
I prefer a balance between O and D because O is more fun, but Heavy D is a valid strategy. I have used it and pulled a win where I probably should have lost. I see no problem at all with it. It's surprising to me that anyone would take exception to a strong D.
I may go heavy D if I feel my opponent has a particular squad I cannot beat. If that team shows up on D then my O is crippled anyway so this may be my best shot. Take what points I can scrape together, maybe it will be enough. If the opposition goes with heavy O then their D will be light, so my light O has a better chance of scoring points and again my heavy D is still my best shot at winning.
Matchup looks unfavorable? Give 'em the D, make them earn it.
There's a difference between setting a strong defense and going full defense, especially if you're just going full def to annoy your opponent.
Setting a strong defense is a viable strategy which could lead to a win, i see nothing wrong with that either.