If Palpatine was all the Sith and Rey all the Jedi and Palps got killed does that mean all Sith are gone for good? And if yes how brings this balance to the force?
"Never make the mistake of believing forbearance equates to acceptance, or that all positions are equally valid."
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
1
Replies
No.
So how does it fit?
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
In game guild: TNR Uprising
I beat the REAL T7 Yoda (not the nerfed one) and did so before mods were there to help
*This space left intentionally blank*
A predetermined breaking point for the Deathstar? I don't know..
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
Alternatively, could it be that the Death star was designed based on the map? As in, the throne room was placed at that exact spot based on this old relic? Seems possible since the map was just based on the curvature of the death star ruins
Hopefully you put more thought into that email than you have in your moody teenager ramblings on this forum.
Same
Didn't you self implode in that other thread and cancel Disney + ?
Probs to have Kylo one day find it and go to Exogul when he was ready
That’s a bold statement. I disagree.
I just enjoyed it. I don’t specifically enjoy any certain part of it that might be “lore breaking”, I just happened to enjoy the movie. Also, it was supposed to be a feel good movie. Not an accurate space drama.
We did.
The end signifies, as I said, that Rey is putting all of that behind her. She’s balancing herself in a way.
If it doesn’t make sense to you with this movie, then Return of the Jedi’s ending also makes no sense.
So she ended all the Sith with killing Palpatine and buried all the Jedi with Lukes and Leias lightsabers? And after that she's starting some new order with grabbing another lightsaber, where everyone is a balanced force user from the start and to all eternity? I mean this sounds absurd but is still better storytelling than TLJ..
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
I would argue that it’s a better attempt at balance. That, or that the prophecy of the chosen one was never about the Jedi and the Sith at all.
Don't think too much into that dialogue by Palpatine other than hyperbole
Exactly! lol
ST lovers say ROTJ wasn't balancing the force as Luke was a sole-surviving and self-proclaimed Jedi, therefore no balance.
Yet Rey defeats the sith and is a self-proclaimed and sole-surviving Jedi and apparently this equals balance?
Hahahahahahahaha.
But this was exactly what Luke did in ROTJ. Anakin was redeemed through love - an emotion the Jedi forbid, and they could not fathom Anakin could be redeemed and needed to be destroyed.
Luke's love saved his father, and Anakin's love saved Luke allowing him to then destroy Palpatine.
The Jedi teach "There is no emotion, there is peace", while the Sith teach "Through passion, I gain strength", but through your passion you gain peace and that was the balance that Luke learned.
He never followed Obi Wan or Yoda's instruction to kill Vader. He was better than that and saw through the dogmatic narrow view of the Jedi.
That was the whole point!
He was then to go forward and teach a new generation of balanced Jedi - "pass on what YOU have learned" not what he was taught.
"We are what they grow beyond. That is the true burden of all masters." - What Yoda says to Luke in TLJ, but Luke had already grown beyond the Jedi of the Republic era and Yoda.
The ST just takes everything Luke accomplished in the OT and slaps Rey's name on it instead of Luke's, in a very rushed and illogical Mary Sue way - that doesn't grow the story of Star Wars at all.
What has Rey done that is any different? NOTHING, is there any point to the story of the sequel trilogy? NO.