Aggressive shard

Replies

  • You could always keep poking the bear in battle and sniping them, and collect screenshots of their aggressive chat responses. If it gets to the point of harassment or intimidation you could report it with the proof. Take tips from Jeff Lowe on how to set someone up.
    Still waiting on that edit forum profile setting so I can change my name...
  • Phoenixeon
    1220 posts Member
    Peace is a lie.
    Just hit them if have time.
  • Mitch08
    276 posts Member
    Don't think I made myself very clear. They have demanded that I stay out of the top 30. After that they will decide if I've been a good boy and put me on a waiting list.

    Sounds like an issue that normal developers would care about. No luck here unfortunately.
  • Lysandrax
    1096 posts Member
    Mitch08 wrote: »
    Don't think I made myself very clear. They have demanded that I stay out of the top 30. After that they will decide if I've been a good boy and put me on a waiting list.

    Sounds like an issue that normal developers would care about. No luck here unfortunately.

    What's your proposed fix?
  • CHFC22
    712 posts Member
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.
  • Lysandrax
    1096 posts Member
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
  • CHFC22
    712 posts Member
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

    Faulty comparison. If there's a chance it'll be a bad chat and you've no way of knowing which your shard has been lumbered with, then the fairest thing to do is to eliminate any chance of the bad thing happening. You might argue back "but what about the good things chat do" but my response woupd be that the cream would rise to the top - ie those with the strongest teams. May be equally difficult to break the top 10 or whatever, but at least I'd know it's because my team simply isn't strong enough rather than because the chat is full, or a rotten one.
  • Smidday
    130 posts Member
    Tell them to bolt, its a game. I don’t recall players in call of duty asking you to not kill them so they can win the match, unless it was those people that used to Nuke FFA with their friends and that was stamped out eventually.

    What are they going to do if you can beat them? Theres nothing they can do if you keep sniping them either. Personally I’d just play when I want and how I want, you can mute and report players in game for abuse too btw. If they are threatening you or Giving abuse Just report them.
  • Jarvind
    3657 posts Member
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    I mean, sure, but CG has no real way of policing it, and even if they did, they have no incentive to do so.
    u58t4vkrvnrz.png



  • Jarvind wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    I mean, sure, but CG has no real way of policing it, and even if they did, they have no incentive to do so.

    Again the only incentive for them would be reducing the amount of Crystal's given out each day, by making it all payouts at the same time like an actual tournament,(since everyone is crying about what if my time doesn't match, they can break all of the groyps and put people with the same time payouts in new groups)
  • Just make it like the other game that shall not be names like voldemort and keep shuffling arena shards over and over,there wont be any good way to coordinate anything like that again,simple easy fix.
  • TVF
    24388 posts Member
    So many bad ideas in this thread.
    TVF's guild is recruiting. Say hi in our Discord! https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • Kyno
    24443 posts Moderator
    Just make it like the other game that shall not be names like voldemort and keep shuffling arena shards over and over,there wont be any good way to coordinate anything like that again,simple easy fix.

    If it had been designed like this from the beginning sure, but a major change like this to the main source of income for so many players would likely not end well for the game.
  • Jarvind
    3657 posts Member

    Again the only incentive for them would be reducing the amount of Crystal's given out each day, by making it all payouts at the same time like an actual tournament

    You know what else reduces the amount of crystals paid out each day? Gangs of angrybois monopolizing shards and pushing everyone else out of the top spots. The job's already being done for them, with zero effort on their part. Why fix it if it ain't broke?
    u58t4vkrvnrz.png



  • Mitch08
    276 posts Member
    Just make it like the other game that shall not be names like voldemort and keep shuffling arena shards over and over,there wont be any good way to coordinate anything like that again,simple easy fix.

    But then all the people abusing the laziness of the devs would get angry.
    Apparently that wouldn't end well.
  • MaruMaru
    718 posts Member
    Just make it like the other game that shall not be names like voldemort and keep shuffling arena shards over and over,there wont be any good way to coordinate anything like that again,simple easy fix.

    Why wouldn't you name another game? Doubt there's anything forbiding it.
  • YetiYeti
    287 posts Member
    Don't think I made myself very clear. They have demanded that I stay out of the top 30. After that they will decide if I've been a good boy and put me on a waiting list.

    If your team is good enough to climb, then I've found that making an absolute nuisance of yourself will likely get you through the 'waiting list' faster.

    Just, "Hey, I want to work with you guys, but you're being unreasonable, so Ill just climb to the best of my ability."
  • YetiYeti
    287 posts Member
    The arena payout is essential for many free to play. I get that. And if someone like the person in my shard reaches out to me,explaining that... I will respect that to the best of my ability most the time. I clearly don't need crystals from arena payout. I have both GL's R7.... greed is ugly no matter who wears it. Why do I rank high in arena? Because that's what my team does! That's where it's level is at. That's the team I want to play.

    I am not intentionally sniping anyone. I'm just playing. Again, only one person in the shard has ever reached out to me. That one person is kinda the go between for the shard and me. Still, if no one is gonna talk to me directly and tell me their PO... then why bother?

    Honestly, in my shard, we would have been courting the hell out of you to join. The second anyone shows up with a GL, then they basically need to be brought into Shard chat ASAP, even if they have never had a top 50 finish before that day.
  • Lysandrax
    1096 posts Member
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

    Faulty comparison. If there's a chance it'll be a bad chat and you've no way of knowing which your shard has been lumbered with, then the fairest thing to do is to eliminate any chance of the bad thing happening. You might argue back "but what about the good things chat do" but my response woupd be that the cream would rise to the top - ie those with the strongest teams. May be equally difficult to break the top 10 or whatever, but at least I'd know it's because my team simply isn't strong enough rather than because the chat is full, or a rotten one.

    1. You can't eliminate chats.
    2. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty

    Any 'faulty comparison' there has been inflicted by your own poor choice of words
  • CHFC22
    712 posts Member
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

    Faulty comparison. If there's a chance it'll be a bad chat and you've no way of knowing which your shard has been lumbered with, then the fairest thing to do is to eliminate any chance of the bad thing happening. You might argue back "but what about the good things chat do" but my response woupd be that the cream would rise to the top - ie those with the strongest teams. May be equally difficult to break the top 10 or whatever, but at least I'd know it's because my team simply isn't strong enough rather than because the chat is full, or a rotten one.

    1. You can't eliminate chats.
    2. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty

    Any 'faulty comparison' there has been inflicted by your own poor choice of words

    You're bringing in a legal comparison that's completely subjective anyway. I didn't do that.
  • Lysandrax
    1096 posts Member
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

    Faulty comparison. If there's a chance it'll be a bad chat and you've no way of knowing which your shard has been lumbered with, then the fairest thing to do is to eliminate any chance of the bad thing happening. You might argue back "but what about the good things chat do" but my response woupd be that the cream would rise to the top - ie those with the strongest teams. May be equally difficult to break the top 10 or whatever, but at least I'd know it's because my team simply isn't strong enough rather than because the chat is full, or a rotten one.

    1. You can't eliminate chats.
    2. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty

    Any 'faulty comparison' there has been inflicted by your own poor choice of words

    You're bringing in a legal comparison that's completely subjective anyway. I didn't do that.

    You're labelling someone as innocent, seperate from the natural law that all people are innocent until found otherwise, and i am the one being subjective.
    Good to know.
  • Xcrit9
    101 posts Member
    edited May 4
    Okay, thanks for your comments. Guess I will just avoid the arena and let them have what they feel so passionate about.

    Don't avoid anything don't ever let someone tell you what to do especially over the internet. do what you want and hit them over and over again they will get fed up and leave you alone and probably even invite you to their shard. They're probably just passed you're messing with their payout
    Post edited by Kyno on
  • if u want to make it harder for these shard chats to have power limit the number of day per week u can use some one in pvp to 1 or 2 days a week so u need 3-4 full teams of different people to compete (not the same 5 jedi in a different order)
    they get there money so they cant complain and it adds a whole new level of team crafting and the add fun of not seeing the the same team all day every day
  • TVF
    24388 posts Member
    if u want to make it harder for these shard chats to have power limit the number of day per week u can use some one in pvp to 1 or 2 days a week so u need 3-4 full teams of different people to compete (not the same 5 jedi in a different order)
    they get there money so they cant complain and it adds a whole new level of team crafting and the add fun of not seeing the the same team all day every day

    Wow, no thanks.
    TVF's guild is recruiting. Say hi in our Discord! https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • littleMAC77
    2291 posts Member
    if u want to make it harder for these shard chats to have power limit the number of day per week u can use some one in pvp to 1 or 2 days a week so u need 3-4 full teams of different people to compete (not the same 5 jedi in a different order)
    they get there money so they cant complain and it adds a whole new level of team crafting and the add fun of not seeing the the same team all day every day

    This might be a new contender for worst idea ever concocted to fix the "problem" of shard chats
    Looking for a new guild? Come check out the Underworld Alliance on Discord:https://discord.gg/wvrYb4Q
  • CHFC22
    712 posts Member
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

    Faulty comparison. If there's a chance it'll be a bad chat and you've no way of knowing which your shard has been lumbered with, then the fairest thing to do is to eliminate any chance of the bad thing happening. You might argue back "but what about the good things chat do" but my response woupd be that the cream would rise to the top - ie those with the strongest teams. May be equally difficult to break the top 10 or whatever, but at least I'd know it's because my team simply isn't strong enough rather than because the chat is full, or a rotten one.

    1. You can't eliminate chats.
    2. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty

    Any 'faulty comparison' there has been inflicted by your own poor choice of words

    You're bringing in a legal comparison that's completely subjective anyway. I didn't do that.

    You're labelling someone as innocent, seperate from the natural law that all people are innocent until found otherwise, and i am the one being subjective.
    Good to know.

    It's a natural law is it? I mean it isn't, and innocent & guilty are a human invention but ok. And even if they weren't your comparison still is wrong, but crack on.
  • Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

    Faulty comparison. If there's a chance it'll be a bad chat and you've no way of knowing which your shard has been lumbered with, then the fairest thing to do is to eliminate any chance of the bad thing happening. You might argue back "but what about the good things chat do" but my response woupd be that the cream would rise to the top - ie those with the strongest teams. May be equally difficult to break the top 10 or whatever, but at least I'd know it's because my team simply isn't strong enough rather than because the chat is full, or a rotten one.

    1. You can't eliminate chats.
    2. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty

    Any 'faulty comparison' there has been inflicted by your own poor choice of words

    You're bringing in a legal comparison that's completely subjective anyway. I didn't do that.

    You're labelling someone as innocent, seperate from the natural law that all people are innocent until found otherwise, and i am the one being subjective.
    Good to know.

    Are you sure about that? Pretty sure only in certain countries you are innocent until proven guilty, in many countries you are guilty until found innocent. Even in countries like united states and Canada that whole innocent until proven guilty has been broken many times, just look at all the Japanese people during world war 2 or all the fake R4pe allegation
  • ZAP
    3128 posts Member
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Lysandrax wrote: »
    CHFC22 wrote: »
    Jarvind wrote: »
    There are two types of shard chats:

    1. The chill kind where people are normal humans and will move out of the way for each other so everyone can get a decent payout.

    2. The kind that is full of sad, angry dingdongs who apparently have so little control over their lives that they feel the need to bully people in a mobile game so they can feel better about themselves.

    Sounds like you got #2. Tough break.

    Exactly. So fairest thing is not to have any as it'll mean innocent people aren't done over by #2.

    Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

    Faulty comparison. If there's a chance it'll be a bad chat and you've no way of knowing which your shard has been lumbered with, then the fairest thing to do is to eliminate any chance of the bad thing happening. You might argue back "but what about the good things chat do" but my response woupd be that the cream would rise to the top - ie those with the strongest teams. May be equally difficult to break the top 10 or whatever, but at least I'd know it's because my team simply isn't strong enough rather than because the chat is full, or a rotten one.

    1. You can't eliminate chats.
    2. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty

    Any 'faulty comparison' there has been inflicted by your own poor choice of words

    You're bringing in a legal comparison that's completely subjective anyway. I didn't do that.

    You're labelling someone as innocent, seperate from the natural law that all people are innocent until found otherwise, and i am the one being subjective.
    Good to know.

    It's a natural law is it? I mean it isn't, and innocent & guilty are a human invention but ok. And even if they weren't your comparison still is wrong, but crack on.

    IKR, that natural law assertion might even be worse than thinking there’s free speech on a privately owned forum.

  • Genpaku408
    113 posts Member
    i sit in a shard, and recently a guy has come in out of no where with the new toy to play with. Hitting everyone through out the day out of 1st.

    I watched the shard try make contact to him, fail, to his guild and be told he doesnt want to be the in the shard.

    So now I watch the shard punch this guy all the time now, and we are sure he's spending to instant refresh and more than 5 fights.

    Not sure if they're stupid to not accept the joining of the shard or do more than 15 attacks in arena a day
Sign In or Register to comment.