I dont really like 3v3, but it is ok. On the other hand, if ,you dont have a GL, you will nost likely loose. I already met a few in 5v5. There I can manage. Im sure I will face more but In 3v3 rey will be indestructable, only Kylo will be beatable. Im not sure 3v3 is a good idea now.
1
Replies
That's assuming that GL players get matched up against each other. Doesn't always happen
Before CG nerfs viable counters. This is the way
Since when have they cared about being fair?
Only feels unfair if you don't have them
Which is a gigantic chunk of the player base. Wouldn’t care too much if GL’s were only matched with GL’s but....
Rey’s whirlwind though....
Not true.
Would you be fine with the GL division,even the bottom person with 0/12 wins would get better rewards than a kyber in the non GL division? cause you are advocating the opportunity to get better rewards than people who will beat you in GAC...
And if you go up against them.
I'm at 5.5 million gp, still haven't seen one in Grand Arena. Only seen maybe two General Anakins, for that matter.
Looks like you already have some experience in countering Rey in a 3v3 without access to a GL yourself (which this topic is about). I'd like to hear your strategy on this one as this whole thing is gonna be worse than the Malak 3v3 thing as you could still kill the people on Malaks side and then zerg him down. With GL Rey that's gonna be incredibly difficult I guess thanks to her kit that's built around survivability.
How does a person that goes 0/12 in a "GL division" gets better rewards than someone from a non "GL division" who got to kyber?
Personally I'd be totally fine with a slight adjustment to the MM system to match people according to the number of GL's they own, 0 GL vs 0 GL, 1 GL vs 1 GL and 2 GL vs 2 GL. Even if it would be only for 3v3 GAC's.
I’m Advocating better matchmaking. I’ve seen plenty of matchups in my own division where they had no place being matched with us. It wasn’t even a contest
But the question is would you be ok with doing it if the people with 2 GLs who lost every battle got better rewards than the people with 0 who won every battle. Because that’s the only way it would be fair. Otherwise you are just punishing people for acquiring better characters.
In a since I think CG wants those that spent to have an advantage, It reaffirms why they spent money in the first place.