Could we maybe get enough ships in the game to utilize all our capital ships maybe? At the very least how about some more first order and resistance so those capital ships can finally have full teams....
I have a pet theory that Ships 3.0 might be on the way - for a long time, pretty much all new ships were just requirements for something (until RC, but that might be needed in some upcoming event). Then there are some recent odd occurences - RC suddenly has "hardware" instead of reinforcement ability in the kit release. A weird gold rectangle appears in battle next to reinforcements (or was it always there and I just didn't notice?). Almost as if they had a reason why not to add ships except when necessary, and some bits from a work in progress update slipped through...
Could be just wishful thinking, though.
I have a pet theory that Ships 3.0 might be on the way - for a long time, pretty much all new ships were just requirements for something (until RC, but that might be needed in some upcoming event). Then there are some recent odd occurences - RC suddenly has "hardware" instead of reinforcement ability in the kit release. A weird gold rectangle appears in battle next to reinforcements (or was it always there and I just didn't notice?). Almost as if they had a reason why not to add ships except when necessary, and some bits from a work in progress update slipped through...
Could be just wishful thinking, though.
My theory is that ships will get updated for the next anniversary update.
“But you know what I always say: Speak softly and drive a big tank.”
I have a pet theory that Ships 3.0 might be on the way - for a long time, pretty much all new ships were just requirements for something (until RC, but that might be needed in some upcoming event). Then there are some recent odd occurences - RC suddenly has "hardware" instead of reinforcement ability in the kit release. A weird gold rectangle appears in battle next to reinforcements (or was it always there and I just didn't notice?). Almost as if they had a reason why not to add ships except when necessary, and some bits from a work in progress update slipped through...
Could be just wishful thinking, though.
My theory is that ships will get updated for the next anniversary update.
Deserve is a strong word, shrug. I don't care what they tell us. It's always subject to change, as you can see above. I only care when it actually happens.
Q: Can we get more simming of existing events, especially ones that have multiple waves (Secrets and Shadows, Rebel Roundup, etc.). Like if we beat them 5 or 10 times, or earn 3*, can we sim them in the future? Thank you!
A: CG_SvenGG - We've been thinking about the best way to decrease the time commitment we ask of players for content they are able to clear with trivial effort. Ultimately, that has led to the realization that we need a holistic approach to time-saving for players so that we can continue to add new content to the game without exacerbating the commitment players feel they have to make each day.
My Q&A question from one of the first Q&As (that I have since modified and continued to ask during every Q&A since) Some battles that we have already achieved 3 stars in are starting to get tedious. All of the eight round assault battles come to mind. Are there any plans to allow us to sim ALL battles that we have already achieved 3 stars in? Over a year ago, when somebody asked for this very QOL update, you said you were going to take a "holistic approach to time-saving" but since then, you have made these battles take even more time by adding additional tiers to the events. Can you please explain the contradiction?
While I agree with you, Im confused as to why you posted it in a ship thread.
TVF posted all those Q&As about ships and the second half of one of questions mentioned the assault battles. One of my pet peeves. Why can't we sim these battles that we have beaten a hundred times by now. Like I said, unrelated to the topic at hand.
While I agree with you, Im confused as to why you posted it in a ship thread.
TVF posted all those Q&As about ships and the second half of one of questions mentioned the assault battles. One of my pet peeves. Why can't we sim these battles that we have beaten a hundred times by now. Like I said, unrelated to the topic at hand.
Replies
Could be just wishful thinking, though.
Resistance: MG-100 StarFortress SF-17 (Tank)
First Order: First Order TIE bomber (Tank)
My theory is that ships will get updated for the next anniversary update.
I sure hope it happens sooner...
DISCLAIMER: Post is subject to change.
Deserve's got nothing to do with it.
if anything we "deserve" to have this game deleted.
You do know you have the ability to do that yourself
DISCLAIMER: Post is subject to change.
ah, but I wont.
Why do we?
Q: Can we get more simming of existing events, especially ones that have multiple waves (Secrets and Shadows, Rebel Roundup, etc.). Like if we beat them 5 or 10 times, or earn 3*, can we sim them in the future? Thank you!
A: CG_SvenGG - We've been thinking about the best way to decrease the time commitment we ask of players for content they are able to clear with trivial effort. Ultimately, that has led to the realization that we need a holistic approach to time-saving for players so that we can continue to add new content to the game without exacerbating the commitment players feel they have to make each day.
My Q&A question from one of the first Q&As (that I have since modified and continued to ask during every Q&A since) Some battles that we have already achieved 3 stars in are starting to get tedious. All of the eight round assault battles come to mind. Are there any plans to allow us to sim ALL battles that we have already achieved 3 stars in? Over a year ago, when somebody asked for this very QOL update, you said you were going to take a "holistic approach to time-saving" but since then, you have made these battles take even more time by adding additional tiers to the events. Can you please explain the contradiction?
A: <silence>
TVF posted all those Q&As about ships and the second half of one of questions mentioned the assault battles. One of my pet peeves. Why can't we sim these battles that we have beaten a hundred times by now. Like I said, unrelated to the topic at hand.
You are technically correct. The best kind of correct.
As is yours.