More ships

Prev1
Ravens1113
5215 posts Member
edited March 2021
Could we maybe get enough ships in the game to utilize all our capital ships maybe? At the very least how about some more first order and resistance so those capital ships can finally have full teams....
Post edited by Kyno on

Replies

  • TVF
    36573 posts Member
    All I want is a new meta. More ships or just a rework, whatever is needed for that to happen.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • Agreed. Negotiator has only been the meta for about 1.5 years now.
  • Nauros
    5429 posts Member
    I have a pet theory that Ships 3.0 might be on the way - for a long time, pretty much all new ships were just requirements for something (until RC, but that might be needed in some upcoming event). Then there are some recent odd occurences - RC suddenly has "hardware" instead of reinforcement ability in the kit release. A weird gold rectangle appears in battle next to reinforcements (or was it always there and I just didn't notice?). Almost as if they had a reason why not to add ships except when necessary, and some bits from a work in progress update slipped through...
    Could be just wishful thinking, though.
  • Legend91
    2441 posts Member
    Separatists: HMP Droid Gunship (Support/Attacker)
    b0bc239fe0558058d421f40411392374.jpg
    Resistance: MG-100 StarFortress SF-17 (Tank)
    _600.jpg
    First Order: First Order TIE bomber (Tank)
    5rjnrtht36d3.png
    Legend#6873 | YouTube | swgoh.gg
  • Nauros
    5429 posts Member
    Wait, the cardboard box full of cartoon bombs is called "fortress"? That must be one of the biggest misnamings in Star Wars...
  • Nauros wrote: »
    I have a pet theory that Ships 3.0 might be on the way - for a long time, pretty much all new ships were just requirements for something (until RC, but that might be needed in some upcoming event). Then there are some recent odd occurences - RC suddenly has "hardware" instead of reinforcement ability in the kit release. A weird gold rectangle appears in battle next to reinforcements (or was it always there and I just didn't notice?). Almost as if they had a reason why not to add ships except when necessary, and some bits from a work in progress update slipped through...
    Could be just wishful thinking, though.

    My theory is that ships will get updated for the next anniversary update.
    “But you know what I always say: Speak softly and drive a big tank.”
  • Nauros
    5429 posts Member
    Nauros wrote: »
    I have a pet theory that Ships 3.0 might be on the way - for a long time, pretty much all new ships were just requirements for something (until RC, but that might be needed in some upcoming event). Then there are some recent odd occurences - RC suddenly has "hardware" instead of reinforcement ability in the kit release. A weird gold rectangle appears in battle next to reinforcements (or was it always there and I just didn't notice?). Almost as if they had a reason why not to add ships except when necessary, and some bits from a work in progress update slipped through...
    Could be just wishful thinking, though.

    My theory is that ships will get updated for the next anniversary update.

    I sure hope it happens sooner...
  • ImaSmakya
    1068 posts Member
    Can we get a way to manage fleet squads first, before they start adding a bunch of ships.
    https://swgoh.gg/p/319514721/
    DISCLAIMER: Post is subject to change.
  • TVF
    36573 posts Member
    Why do we deserve that lol.

    Deserve's got nothing to do with it.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • TVF wrote: »
    Why do we deserve that lol.

    Deserve's got nothing to do with it.

    if anything we "deserve" to have this game deleted.
    “But you know what I always say: Speak softly and drive a big tank.”
  • ImaSmakya
    1068 posts Member
    TVF wrote: »
    Why do we deserve that lol.

    Deserve's got nothing to do with it.

    if anything we "deserve" to have this game deleted.

    You do know you have the ability to do that yourself :/
    https://swgoh.gg/p/319514721/
    DISCLAIMER: Post is subject to change.
  • ImaSmakya wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Why do we deserve that lol.

    Deserve's got nothing to do with it.

    if anything we "deserve" to have this game deleted.

    You do know you have the ability to do that yourself :/

    ah, but I wont.
    “But you know what I always say: Speak softly and drive a big tank.”
  • TVF
    36573 posts Member
    Iy4oy4s wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Why do we deserve that lol.

    Deserve's got nothing to do with it.

    Why don't we deserve it?

    Why do we?
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • TVF
    36573 posts Member
    Deserve is a strong word, shrug. I don't care what they tell us. It's always subject to change, as you can see above. I only care when it actually happens.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • TVF
    36573 posts Member
    Neither deserve nor necessary are correct lol.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • LendersQuiz
    1166 posts Member
    edited March 2021
    Unrelated to the topic at hand but.......

    Q: Can we get more simming of existing events, especially ones that have multiple waves (Secrets and Shadows, Rebel Roundup, etc.). Like if we beat them 5 or 10 times, or earn 3*, can we sim them in the future? Thank you!

    A: CG_SvenGG - We've been thinking about the best way to decrease the time commitment we ask of players for content they are able to clear with trivial effort. Ultimately, that has led to the realization that we need a holistic approach to time-saving for players so that we can continue to add new content to the game without exacerbating the commitment players feel they have to make each day.


    My Q&A question from one of the first Q&As (that I have since modified and continued to ask during every Q&A since) Some battles that we have already achieved 3 stars in are starting to get tedious. All of the eight round assault battles come to mind. Are there any plans to allow us to sim ALL battles that we have already achieved 3 stars in? Over a year ago, when somebody asked for this very QOL update, you said you were going to take a "holistic approach to time-saving" but since then, you have made these battles take even more time by adding additional tiers to the events. Can you please explain the contradiction?

    A: <silence>
  • Iy4oy4s wrote: »
    While I agree with you, Im confused as to why you posted it in a ship thread.

    TVF posted all those Q&As about ships and the second half of one of questions mentioned the assault battles. One of my pet peeves. Why can't we sim these battles that we have beaten a hundred times by now. Like I said, unrelated to the topic at hand.
  • Iy4oy4s wrote: »
    While I agree with you, Im confused as to why you posted it in a ship thread.

    TVF posted all those Q&As about ships and the second half of one of questions mentioned the assault battles. One of my pet peeves. Why can't we sim these battles that we have beaten a hundred times by now. Like I said, unrelated to the topic at hand.
    Check again. It wasn’t TVF that pasted those Q&As
  • Check again. It wasn’t TVF that pasted those Q&As

    You are technically correct. The best kind of correct.
  • TVF
    36573 posts Member
    Iy4oy4s wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Neither deserve nor necessary are correct lol.

    anecdotal

    As is yours.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • TVF
    36573 posts Member
    Sigh, I did. Moving on.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • is all this arguing really necessary?
    “But you know what I always say: Speak softly and drive a big tank.”
Sign In or Register to comment.