AOHNH Member

About

Username
AOHNH
Joined
Visits
95
Last Active
Roles
Member
Points
22

Reactions

Replies

  • NoomiZ wrote: » The accomadation you get is the result that GW has been toned down again. Teaches us that whining about a subject apparently does make things happen here. Be happy they did something about a bug that was not a bug. So, is this…
    in GW Fix Reply by AOHNH December 2018
  • 3 days now, and no super OP teams on node 3. Either I'm lucky, or the bug was indeed fixed.
  • BucMan55 wrote: » I believe something happened early October possible late September. I completed 150 GW from early April until then, and wasn't level 85 until November so couldn't sim. Something definitely changed. I can confirm seeing OP te…
  • Darth_DeVito wrote: » And the reason they don't care much is the choir of "you're doing it wrong" and "it's always been this way" from older players who have never faced this issue in this severe form and can't fathom that something has changed. A…
  • Honestly, it doesn't look like CG/EA cares that much. GW feedback is flooded with simple complaints, elaborate explanations, and tons of examples. There's no reply. Not even "we're looking into this".
  • Waqui wrote: » I believe the first problem here is to understand how GW matchmaking is actually designed/implemented. Well, some players are posting that it's based on arena team and some say that it's based on top 5 chars. I've even seen a q…
  • jhbuchholz wrote: » The whole game mode is only for new players. Of course it's applicable to new players. Not every player is a min/maxer. It gives diversity to the game. So, it basically provides a way to double (or more) the time it ta…
  • jhbuchholz wrote: » It's meant to be hard. I'm not against hard, I'm against impossible. It's meant to require multiple teams. These cannot possibly be applicable to new players. It's not logical to level up multiple squads for new p…
  • GhostTruckin wrote: » Just because you refuse to believe that having more then one squad built up is th Europe’s way to handle Gw , doesn’t make you right. The point of Gw is to punish players that build one squad only, and have zero roster de…
  • GhostTruckin wrote: » Then at that level, people would agree, however, making the current style a gimme basically across all levels, doesn’t make sense. Don't like repeating myself, but I guess I have to: I'm not asking for a gimme. Try…
  • MastersRising wrote: » All you have to do is beat it 150 times and then it's cake. If there was an exclamation point, I'd guess this to be sarcasm. That's half of year, if you win every single one of them. So, depending on RNG, somewhere b…
  • DarkHelmet1138 wrote: » There is most definitely rng involved in the selection of the teams. I don't think anyone has argued that there isn't. The alternative is to face the same programmed teams which would get boring a lot sooner. I was rep…
  • DarkHelmet1138 wrote: » I doesn't stay impossible though. As you level, it gets easier even to the point of boring. That's why the sim was needed. They capped the difficulty at something being based off a player shortly after hitting level 85 so o…
  • Kyno wrote: » The reason you are not getting that is because it's not true. It's meant to be difficult and it is built that way using a pretty simple method. I'm guessing it's using some sort of power calculation, but that doesn't mean tha…
  • DarkHelmet1138 wrote: » Basically, they gain nothing by making it easy. No one spends to beat it and it is just boring. At that point it might as well be removed and the rewards added to the daily rewards. I guess there's theoretically more t…
  • KausDebonair wrote: » It’s clearlt not a stupid choice if everybody in this thread is telling you to do it. Literally nobody is telling me that (including my guild) except you. And it looks like the only reason you're saying that is because y…
  • Rath_Tarr wrote: » Do not assume that your opponent's gear, skills and mods are max'd. Very often they wont be. Why would I assume anything, I can see the stats of the enemy squad... Speaking of which, it's time you showed us your squad..…
  • DarkHelmet1138 wrote: » Look it boils down to this. It's designed to be hard and even unbeatable sometimes. That is so whales will spend to buy toons/gear so they can beat it sooner. At least you're not beating around the bush here. It still …
  • Huatimus wrote: » Can’t wait to see what OP has to say once he starts meeting opponents with Zeta abilities. Same thing I'm saying right now: placing unwinnable battles in GW is a bad design. I'd love a logical explanation from devs on t…
  • KausDebonair wrote: » That’s exactly what GW is. It’s been that way since inception. I don’t understand why you believe that, for some reason, it shouldn’t apply today. I've explained it numerous times now, and every counter to my argument is…
  • Rath_Tarr wrote: » Level is not the only factor in a character's power. Gear, *s, skill levels and mods all play a part. Sounds like you're helping me. Gear and skill levels unlock based on character's level. Higher level = better gear. * cou…
  • KausDebonair wrote: » I feel like you’re missing the main fact of this game: it’s a slow burn. I'm not missing it, I just don't see how it applies to new players as of today. Yeah, choosing to focus on a strong arena team is the most “log…
  • DarkHelmet1138 wrote: » You have already said you're not willing to divert focus from arena which is your choice but the strategy of gw is to have several good teams to outlast the nodes. Actually, what I've said is that there's no logical re…
  • GhostTruckin wrote: » So, to recap I have no desire to respond to ad hominem attacks. If you wish to make a logical case, please do so.
  • DarkHelmet1138 wrote: » I never said you shouldn't focus on arena. It is important. But if you could focus solely on arena and never fall short elsewhere, there wouldn't be much challenge managing your resources. And ultimately that is what thi…
  • GhostTruckin wrote: » Sorry, you are again wrong. Have a good one. Sorry you have to give up like that, without any logical explanation. But have a good one too, I guess.
  • GhostTruckin wrote: » Your right, the plan is to have you develop your roster. You can’t accomplish anything worthwhile in this game with one single squad. That is also wrong, from a new player's perspective. It's always best to go for a s…
  • EventineElessedil wrote: » But that is not the best strategy for GW, which is what you are complaining about. Then the best strategy for GW has no meaning. It stalls your progression, which slows down your ability to contribute better to your…
  • GhostTruckin wrote: » In short. It’s appropriate, there’s nothing wrong with it, it is supposed to be a challenge, not a cakewalk, if you don’t like it, well, sorry, don’t play then lol. I can't agree with this. When you get the high end …
  • DarkHelmet1138 wrote: » Gw makes new players have consequences for focusing solely on arena and not having a broad roster and encourages you to build a broader roster. There's no reason to do this to new players. Arena rewards are gems, so it…
Avatar

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!