If GA is going to have "Championship" designations
Then we should have F2P vs P2P titles. Most players might want to know the best F2Pers and how high they have gotten.
0
- 60.9K General Discussion
- 9 Developer Q&A Archive
- 2.6K New Players
- 30.5K Arena and Character Strategy
- 4K Individual Events
- 4.6K Guild Events
- 4.6K PVP and Rivalry
- 50.1K Guild Recruitment
- 731 Art and Media
- 4.1K Off Topic
Howdy, Stranger!
Replies
I disagree, respectfully.
It would become a public badge of honor to be a F2P champion, as I think the F2P title would carry more community weight than the P2P titles.
lol whatever
people be paying double/triple to get their handle on top...
the only reason it should never happen is because the concept is just meh (using meh instead of what I want to say because of filter)
I don't know I just think the F2P titles would be more sought after by the community in general which would affect spending.
I mean if a P2P is the champion then that is what is expected (You paid to Win), but if a F2P is the champion then that seems like a more valuable accomplishment (you know the whole David vs Goliath scenario).
Goldfish (F2P bait for the rest)
Piranha
Halibut
Tuna
Whale
Kraken
How do you forget minnow?
Its time to end labels and payism
Who is whining? My original post here is asking for a champion title that gives props to P2Pers separate from F2Pers. We have titles now that come from things like doing 200 battles with an all Jedi team. Doing 3 years of F2P and taking 1st place in all your GA events seems far more worthy of a title.
I don't disagree that it's an accomplishment, but I seriously doubt they'd add such a restrictive title to the game, especially since they get their funding from the p2p ppl, who would be unable to obtain it. Remember, it's a business, and they wanna keep their supporters happy and spending.
They indicate money OR time spent.
and good decision making
"Most players"? I must be a minority, then, because I don't care if my rivals are p2p or f2p.
Why are paying players any less worthy? If you find them less worthy, why single them out?
Just trying to find out, what drives your line of thinking.
The comparison I presented in what you quoted is stating the Jedi Knight Title is less worthy of a title than being a GA champion across your total GA's without dropping coin.
From CG's perspective I can understand how they would see it as saying, "Congratulations for being successful in our game without paying for it", but at the same time there are people that go hunt lions and then there are people that pay poachers to help them get set up to assassinate lions for a photo-shot. We view 1 of them as the real hunter
Again:
Why are paying players (who achieve the same things as non-paying players) any less worthy?
Again:
Why single those 'unworthy' players out?
I already understood, that you think this is how it is, and what should be done. That's not what I ask. Please explain the why you find them less worthy, and why they should be singled out.