Are we gonna get the same feats for the next GAC?

Rake6

Some of the feats are really annoying. They make you use team on attack which you wanna use on defense. Please stop. That ain't kool.

RandomSithLord

Disagree.

Might do you good to change up your strategy every once in a while and make you evaluate if a weaker defense and the risk of losing is worth those extra 50 points.

TVF

Why don't people want to make choices in a game about choices?

Jarvind

You don't have to get every feat. You can skip a few and still make Kyber.

GreenGoblin96

Jarvind wrote: »

You don't have to get every feat. You can skip a few and still make Kyber.

Depends on division

Jarvind

GreenGoblin96 wrote: »

Jarvind wrote: »

You don't have to get every feat. You can skip a few and still make Kyber.

Depends on division

I am 100% confident that there is no division where it is required to complete every single feat to make Kyber. I'll bet you a vault.

TVF

Jarvind wrote: »

GreenGoblin96 wrote: »

Jarvind wrote: »

You don't have to get every feat. You can skip a few and still make Kyber.

Depends on division

I am 100% confident that there is no division where it is required to complete every single feat to make Kyber. I'll bet you a vault.

Well sure but the margin of error is much smaller for some divisions, that's the point.

Akenno

I hope they'll reduce / remove the amount of fleet and arena battles for the feats... They have nothing to do with GAC.

Rath_Tarr

TVF wrote: »

Jarvind wrote: »

GreenGoblin96 wrote: »

Jarvind wrote: »

You don't have to get every feat. You can skip a few and still make Kyber.

Depends on division

I am 100% confident that there is no division where it is required to complete every single feat to make Kyber. I'll bet you a vault.

Well sure but the margin of error is much smaller for some divisions, that's the point.

That may be more a consequence of the fact that feats do not scale with Division than a deliberate design choice.