GAC Matchmaking issues with Relics

Hey CG,

I don't know if you are aware of it but Relics kinda broke the matchmaking.
People who relic some chars gonna have a big downside towards matchmaking.

For example:
I have 18 relics and my enemy 6. So I have 12 G13 chars more than him.

But here is the problem:
I have around 26 G12 chars and my enemy 78! That is over 50 chars more than me with a higher gear!

12 G13 chars (even at low relics) are not as good as more than 50 G12 chars.

Top 60 GP is the same but he have 300k character GP more. That is a disadvantage for me.

Are there any news regarding an improvement towards matchmaking?
Personally I recommend to match people with the same points and do the roster check inside the divisions (For example smaller divisions and more of them). This would open up more divisions aswell as fights for kyber #1.
GAC should be around "Who is the best inside this division" but right now it is "Who has the best luck with matchmaking".

Would be great if you can improve the matchmaking. Love the game and can't wait for more content! Keep the work up. :)

Replies

  • I am in a similar situation and doing just fine, in fact I went 12-0 for the first time last GAC and I am 5-0 so far this GAC.
  • CCyrilS
    5398 posts Member
    So are you asking for help with how total gp doesn't matter? Or how to win with a lean roster?
  • Waqui
    8549 posts Member
    Akenno wrote: »
    Hey CG,

    I don't know if you are aware of it but Relics kinda broke the matchmaking.
    People who relic some chars gonna have a big downside towards matchmaking.

    For example:
    I have 18 relics and my enemy 6. So I have 12 G13 chars more than him.

    But here is the problem:
    I have around 26 G12 chars and my enemy 78! That is over 50 chars more than me with a higher gear!

    12 G13 chars (even at low relics) are not as good as more than 50 G12 chars.

    In other discussions on these forums players claim, that you are the one with the advantage.

  • CCyrilS
    5398 posts Member
    Waqui wrote: »
    Akenno wrote: »
    Hey CG,

    I don't know if you are aware of it but Relics kinda broke the matchmaking.
    People who relic some chars gonna have a big downside towards matchmaking.

    For example:
    I have 18 relics and my enemy 6. So I have 12 G13 chars more than him.

    But here is the problem:
    I have around 26 G12 chars and my enemy 78! That is over 50 chars more than me with a higher gear!

    12 G13 chars (even at low relics) are not as good as more than 50 G12 chars.

    In other discussions on these forums players claim, that you are the one with the advantage.

    Wait, you mean ppl complain no matter what?

    Or that ppl look at stats and think they're already beat without trying?

    Mm favors lean rosters! No, it favors wide rosters!

    Play the friggin game!
  • Waqui
    8549 posts Member
    CCyrilS wrote: »
    Waqui wrote: »
    Akenno wrote: »
    Hey CG,

    I don't know if you are aware of it but Relics kinda broke the matchmaking.
    People who relic some chars gonna have a big downside towards matchmaking.

    For example:
    I have 18 relics and my enemy 6. So I have 12 G13 chars more than him.

    But here is the problem:
    I have around 26 G12 chars and my enemy 78! That is over 50 chars more than me with a higher gear!

    12 G13 chars (even at low relics) are not as good as more than 50 G12 chars.

    In other discussions on these forums players claim, that you are the one with the advantage.

    Wait, you mean ppl complain no matter what?

    Some will, yes. I still like to believe, that most players simply observe and adapt.

  • CCyrilS wrote: »
    Wait, you mean ppl complain no matter what?

    Or that ppl look at stats and think they're already beat without trying?

    Mm favors lean rosters! No, it favors wide rosters!

    Play the friggin game!
    Smart players favor themselves my understanding the game and managing their rosters accordingly. B)
  • CCyrilS
    5398 posts Member
    Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    CCyrilS wrote: »
    Wait, you mean ppl complain no matter what?

    Or that ppl look at stats and think they're already beat without trying?

    Mm favors lean rosters! No, it favors wide rosters!

    Play the friggin game!
    Smart players favor themselves my understanding the game and managing their rosters accordingly. B)

    Stop, you're going to give away our advantage!
  • CCyrilS wrote: »
    Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    CCyrilS wrote: »
    Wait, you mean ppl complain no matter what?

    Or that ppl look at stats and think they're already beat without trying?

    Mm favors lean rosters! No, it favors wide rosters!

    Play the friggin game!
    Smart players favor themselves my understanding the game and managing their rosters accordingly. B)

    Stop, you're going to give away our advantage!
    Surely somebody else must have figured it out in the last year!? We can't be the only ones. ;)
  • CCyrilS
    5398 posts Member
    Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    CCyrilS wrote: »
    Rath_Tarr wrote: »
    CCyrilS wrote: »
    Wait, you mean ppl complain no matter what?

    Or that ppl look at stats and think they're already beat without trying?

    Mm favors lean rosters! No, it favors wide rosters!

    Play the friggin game!
    Smart players favor themselves my understanding the game and managing their rosters accordingly. B)

    Stop, you're going to give away our advantage!
    Surely somebody else must have figured it out in the last year!? We can't be the only ones. ;)

    You'd be surprised
  • 6-0 and looking good for 7-0 since yet another opponent foolishly tried to turtle on me. >:)
Sign In or Register to comment.