Characters who are rezzed should not lose stun!
April 6, 2016 5:15PM
edited April 2016
I'd like an official response if this is intended or not. Currently if you kill a stunned character, they lose their stun if they are rezzed, and will often be able to attack immediately. It seems weird that you would want a character to live so that the stun doesn't wear off through a resurrection. If their turn meter bar was topped off, they will attack as soon as you kill them.
Edit: Dropping buffs is a penalty, but dropping debuffs is a reward. It seems silly to reward a character for dying.
Edit: Dropping buffs is a penalty, but dropping debuffs is a reward. It seems silly to reward a character for dying.
Post edited by Kopfschuss on
0
- 61.2K General Discussion
- 9 Developer Q&A Archive
- 2.6K New Players
- 30.5K Arena and Character Strategy
- 4K Individual Events
- 4.6K Guild Events
- 4.6K PVP and Rivalry
- 50.2K Guild Recruitment
- 732 Art and Media
- 4.1K Off Topic
Howdy, Stranger!
Replies
Thank you for your post, but I would argue that it makes more sense for a disabled character to still lose a turn if they were stunned before killed.
They are dead. Different state. THEN they rez, another different state. You can't keep buffs when dead, they disappear then RE-appear..
This works the way as it SHOULD. Not sure what all the fuss is about..
bingo!
You lost you will get over it.. eventually.. its a game.. chillax
Looks like the wolves are out today...I still won the match, but I thought it was strange that the GS was able to use his swarm immediately after being stunned and killed. My original post was to ask for clarification the idea, as I wasn't able to find another topic about it. I've noticed you make poor inferences in some previous posts, and it's not constructive to the topics. I can assure you that I am very relaxed, and I appreciate your concern! Cheers!
ROFLMAO
No. That's absurd.
You killed them, they died. They are no longer stunned if they are *DEAD* because they are dead.
If they res, why would they have a status effect from their previous life?
What gets me is a stunned to on dodges.
In game guild: TNR Uprising
I beat the REAL T7 Yoda (not the nerfed one) and did so before mods were there to help
*This space left intentionally blank*
I would actually be fine with them keeping their status effects, because then my ST Han would still have taunt up. I think it should be as it is though.
In game guild: TNR Uprising
I beat the REAL T7 Yoda (not the nerfed one) and did so before mods were there to help
*This space left intentionally blank*
This! Stun is a debuff and gives you a few hits to go after other threats. If you kill a stunned toon with others on the table, your doing something wrong.
They are rewarded for being brought back from the dead. That's pretty hard to do. A lot harder than killing someone.
It's not about penalties and rewards. If the character kept the same state after revive, revives would just be a junky heal with a 65 percent chance of doing nothing.
Frequently I'll drop my heavy dps cool downs to wipe out a threat fast, then they pop right back up and go the second they're rezzed before anyone else on my squad and wipe someone out
Do they currently lose all their buffs? I see Revive incredibly rarely.
Some toons get buffs just for living, like sid if anyone dies. Or RG so he doesn't stick around and block later. I can think of some reasons for that, but not the stun revive thing.
They used to keep debuffs and buffs when revived but this was changed to align with what tbe developers intended. Go read the update notes.
That's why you kill GS first, or atleast that what I do. Every game I every played is like that.
The penalty for dying and then being reraised is low health, that's it. No stun, no heal immunity...low health. Yes that is how it is intended no it is not a bug. He probably swarmed you cause GS turn meter was higher than yours.
+1 I think Daka gives haste
Dooku =/= logic
Yeah, counterattack on revive doesn't seem right, haven't personally seen that but I'll keep an eye out.