Can you guys pick up the pace with ship releases already? One ship every few months is beyond pathetic on your guys part. We now have 10 capital ships and nowhere near enough ships to push enough viable fleets. There are ton of pilotless ship options available in lore, or even piloted options from toons we already have.
Cmon CG, enough already, produce some ship content and of course the “complicated” fleet loadouts to boot.
0
Replies
Right - and technically should count as 3 ships.
What game mode requires 10 capital ships?
However I do agree that I would like more, and that there are plenty to choose from.
It would be nice to have more then one dropped battle in fleets in GAC. Even placing something sporadic on defense you have one dropped battle and that’s it because even though you have extra capital ships you have nothing to use them with.
What game mode requires 295 characters (I guess besides TW if you wanted)? but that's how many we have. Given that a character squad is generally either 5 or 3, and a ship squad maxes at 7, you'd think we'd have more ships to choose from
If they released more ships than characters, I'd be out of the game. My fleet standard is probably better than my character standard right now, however I really don't enjoy ships. I find it dull compared to character battles.
To each, their own. But I'm not saying we should have more ships than we have characters. Just that we need more ships, and they should step up on pumping some out
We don’t need more ships than characters, but we need enough ships to field full fleets with the capital ships we have.
Really we should also have enough for it to be mathematically possible to max LS Geo. Last count I think we still need 28 more ships for that to be possible.
And just to pile on other poster: just because no game mode *requires* 10 capital ships does not mean you should not be able to use 10 full fleets in TW/GA if you wanted to.
But I yield, you are right.
Well, I stopped reading at the question, so there's that.
That being the case, how does having those two extra slots filled make a fleet more viable? The only impact I see is a defense fleet that holds but loses a ship or two still has some depth. How often does this happen?
I personally find the release ratio of new ships to capital ships sufficient. I also don’t worry about having ships in offensive fleets that I know I will not have need/opportunity to call in.
28, so the GP to max LS Geo exists, is my call.
What I find interesting is the fact that, iirc, looking at a Crew Member's shards shows "ships needed" rather than "ship needed." It could be possible that there are some characters that could be used for Crew in multiple ships (though I imagine only one of these ships can be used in a battle).
Marauder when tho.
Maybe some people want to actually be able to get full stars in light side Geo TB?
Maybe some people want more flexibility in their fleet lineups with more options or be able to use different capital ships without making others unusable due to a lack of ships?
Maybe some want fleet loadouts so they don’t make mistakes that otherwise wouldn’t happen if they could have lineups saved?
Maybe some people realize that berating CG and stomping their feet isn't going to make the anything happen any faster.
But then again, maybe some people enjoy being called 'pathetic' and respond positively to that.
Ravens, they're not going to get it done any faster because you insulted them. They're going to release ships according to their existing calendar no matter what you say... so why be like that? More ships are coming. They're working on it. They know we want more ships - they know we NEED more ships. It's going to happen, but they aren't obligated to do it on your timeline nor because you said so.
Well when they promised a “shipload” of content and failed to deliver on the ships, I call it as I see it.
Maybe they should listen to their community for once and listen to what their paying customers and players are calling for?
So if they know we want and more importantly NEED more ships, why wouldn’t they get a faster cadence out?
Sorry if I’m being rude to CG in your eyes, but when they deserve criticism and negative feedback I give it. When they are deserving of praise and positivity I give it; it’s their own fault if they haven’t been deserving of the latter for the longest time 🤷🏻♂️
What gets me is that it's never worked. I've been watching you toss insults into the void for years now and nothing has changed as a result of it. But you keep doing it. You somehow manage to keep a negative, complaint filled pot of petulant drivel perpetually simmering on the back burner of these forums to absolutely no positive result. The only thing that I can come up with as to why you do it is that you think it makes you feel better - but you do it at the expense of anyone that happens to read your semi-coherent ramblings.
The expense of who? I don’t force anyone to read or respond to my posts, that includes you. If you don’t like what I post then feel free to scroll past it. Thanks
My point remains the same, the rate that they’re releasing ships is pathetic.
Thanks for showing me the forum guidelines, however I never said they were, but the rate that they’re releasing the ships. Thanks for your input that has nothing to do with ships on a post about ships.
Are you a Whale Biologist?