36 GW battles in a row for Tuesday Guild Activity

Prev1
There is a possibility to get 3 GW in 1 day period.

I just want to know, will it be ok to get 36 GW battles per player in Tuesday Guild Activity?

Or later we could find from EA, that it's a bug?..
Russian SW:GoH Community| 4PDA

Replies

  • Greg1920
    1777 posts Member
    Options
    Your guild mates are going to be mad that they now have to tie your ridiculous GW production to tie coins. Agree to something more reasonable that still gets you guys to tier 7
  • Diraan
    332 posts Member
    Options
    It's not a bug. Depending on your personal time zone, and the one in which your guild is based, you could do 36 nodes for the challenge. This is not an exploit as it does not circumvent anything established in the game.

    They may, however, patch the game at a later date to disallow this, though I doubt they will.
    4/25/2016 - The day General Grevious Shards were reasonably priced.
  • Options
    Greg1920 wrote: »
    Your guild mates are going to be mad that they now have to tie your ridiculous GW production to tie coins. Agree to something more reasonable that still gets you guys to tier 7
    Guild day not equal Game day, that's why there is a possibility to get 2 restarts.

    Not only me is waiting for an answer. Many of us could get 36.
    Russian SW:GoH Community| 4PDA
  • Diraan
    332 posts Member
    Options
    Greg1920 wrote: »
    Your guild mates are going to be mad that they now have to tie your ridiculous GW production to tie coins. Agree to something more reasonable that still gets you guys to tier 7

    Most in my guild are able to get the 36 nodes (and we planned for this). As long as everyone does the same amount of nodes, then you will all tie for 1st.
    4/25/2016 - The day General Grevious Shards were reasonably priced.
  • Timitock
    2844 posts Member
    Options
    Do them all, let the others catch up.

    They are trying to communize your reward.
  • renato4571
    29 posts Member
    edited April 2016
    Options
    Why would you be complaining the more gw attempts your guild members do the higher tier you can achieve that means better reward for the whole guild
  • Alexone
    3646 posts Member
    Options
    renato4571 wrote: »
    Why would you be complaining the more gw attempts your guild members do the higher tier you can achieve that mean better reward for the whole guild

    Exactly. Why are you complaining about how many GW's he can do? If you complain about how many coins one can make maybe you haven't seen the rewards for Rancor yet?
  • Options
    @EA_Jesse could we please get an official answer? ;)
    Russian SW:GoH Community| 4PDA
  • Timitock
    2844 posts Member
    Options
    He might need an official question...
  • Alexone
    3646 posts Member
    Options
    @Kochegara_Ru This is not a bug apparently always was like this even though i didn't know about it till yesterday.
  • Kochegara_Ru
    37 posts Member
    edited April 2016
    Options
    @EA_Jesse
    Getting 36 GW battles in Tuesday Guild Activity by using difference between Guild Day and Player's Day is not a bug?
    Russian SW:GoH Community| 4PDA
  • Timitock
    2844 posts Member
    Options
    @EA_Jesse
    Getting 36 GW battles in Tuesday Guild Activity by using difference between Guild Day and Player's Day is not a bug?

    I can save him the effort.

    Not a bug.
  • Options
    Your making it seem like a lot of people in your guild are going to get 36 attempts in reality 1 maybe 2 will get the 36 attempts .
  • Vampire_X
    1435 posts Moderator
    Options
    Bed bug though?????
    Wicked Sith Queen with the Pink Saber
  • Aero
    2972 posts Member
    Options
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
  • Options
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements

    Oh noez!
    Say no to bugs! Geonosian ones
  • Options
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Yeah, fool, by gettin banned for 15 DV shards.
    Just don't wanna be banned again.
    Russian SW:GoH Community| 4PDA
  • Alexone
    3646 posts Member
    Options
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements

    No they won't that would make it impossibiru to complete!
  • Options
    This is pretty stupid
  • scootle
    237 posts Member
    edited April 2016
    Options
    Most people will have no problem doing this if they can tolerate clearing 36 GW nodes.

    The only caveat is for someone, like one guy in our guild, who has somehow ended up on a server reset that comes 30 minutes after guild reset time (7:30p PDT guild, 8:00p PDT server)... THAT sucks.

    This whole timezone disjoint in their mechanics is simply aggravating, to put it lightly. Completely stupid.

    (I can't believe the word "s-tupid" is in their language filter... hahahaha)
    SWGoH Ally Code: 988-869-147 GM of [Elite Casual]
    May the Force be with you.
  • Qeltar
    4326 posts Member
    Options
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Guaranteed that once they discover all the banking going on that they will increase everything.
    Quit 7/14/16. Best of luck to all of you.
  • scootle
    237 posts Member
    Options
    Qeltar wrote: »
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Guaranteed that once they discover all the banking going on that they will increase everything.

    Their mechanics/game-systems leads are not very good at thinking outside their limited little box it would appear... any MMO-scale game designer should know for a guaranteed fact that every single mechanic will be gamed for good or bad purposes...

    SWGoH Ally Code: 988-869-147 GM of [Elite Casual]
    May the Force be with you.
  • Arube
    1026 posts Member
    Options
    Qeltar wrote: »
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Guaranteed that once they discover all the banking going on that they will increase everything.

    Other than GW I don't think any tier requirement will be changed.
    The significance of Critical-Utopian Socialism and Communism bears an inverse relation to historical development.
  • Timitock
    2844 posts Member
    Options
    scootle wrote: »
    Qeltar wrote: »
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Guaranteed that once they discover all the banking going on that they will increase everything.

    Their mechanics/game-systems leads are not very good at thinking outside their limited little box it would appear... any MMO-scale game designer should know for a guaranteed fact that every single mechanic will be gamed for good or bad purposes...

    This isnt an MMO.
  • Alexone
    3646 posts Member
    Options
    Arube wrote: »
    Qeltar wrote: »
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Guaranteed that once they discover all the banking going on that they will increase everything.

    Other than GW I don't think any tier requirement will be changed.

    That would be a disaster already! People aren't playing this game to save up energy, they want to play freely without constraints. GW is one of the few days that some f2p guilds can actually have a shot of getting a higher tier. Or is that forbidden?
  • scootle
    237 posts Member
    Options
    Timitock wrote: »
    scootle wrote: »
    Qeltar wrote: »
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Guaranteed that once they discover all the banking going on that they will increase everything.

    Their mechanics/game-systems leads are not very good at thinking outside their limited little box it would appear... any MMO-scale game designer should know for a guaranteed fact that every single mechanic will be gamed for good or bad purposes...

    This isnt an MMO.

    You can quote semantics all you want... the scale of users for this game is MMO-scale... and so goes the abuse of the game systems. If it was purely single player, the impacts would be far more limited in scale than what we are seeing with the latest new features... just sayin' :)
    SWGoH Ally Code: 988-869-147 GM of [Elite Casual]
    May the Force be with you.
  • Qeltar
    4326 posts Member
    edited April 2016
    Options
    Arube wrote: »
    Qeltar wrote: »
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Guaranteed that once they discover all the banking going on that they will increase everything.

    Other than GW I don't think any tier requirement will be changed.

    The challenges one will be for sure (it is very easy banking) and possibly the arena one as well.
    Or they might surprise us and just give us a break.
    If they remove the ability to bank GW that would be very bad, as many people need that flexibility. If they up the requirements thereby essentially forcing people to bank stuff, that would also be bad.
    So maybe they know about this stuff and are just allowing it. One can hope.
    Quit 7/14/16. Best of luck to all of you.
  • Timitock
    2844 posts Member
    Options
    scootle wrote: »
    Timitock wrote: »
    scootle wrote: »
    Qeltar wrote: »
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Guaranteed that once they discover all the banking going on that they will increase everything.

    Their mechanics/game-systems leads are not very good at thinking outside their limited little box it would appear... any MMO-scale game designer should know for a guaranteed fact that every single mechanic will be gamed for good or bad purposes...

    This isnt an MMO.

    You can quote semantics all you want... the scale of users for this game is MMO-scale... and so goes the abuse of the game systems. If it was purely single player, the impacts would be far more limited in scale than what we are seeing with the latest new features... just sayin' :)

    Ever consider that the Devs are professionals, and know what they are doing?
  • scootle
    237 posts Member
    edited April 2016
    Options
    Qeltar wrote: »
    Arube wrote: »
    Qeltar wrote: »
    Aero wrote: »
    You fool! We all knew this, but weren't saying it. Now they might increase tier requirements
    Guaranteed that once they discover all the banking going on that they will increase everything.

    Other than GW I don't think any tier requirement will be changed.

    The challenges one will be for sure (it is very easy banking) and possibly the arena one as well.
    Or they might surprise us and just give us a break.
    If they remove the ability to bank GW that would be very bad, as many people need that flexibility. If they up the requirements thereby essentially forcing people to bank stuff, that would also be bad.
    So maybe they know about this stuff and are just allowing it. One can hope.

    I'd be curious how they could do anything to change the challenges task... you have a fixed number of runs per (server) day... how that one can't end up as 50-way ties in any competent guild of 50 humans is incomprehensible... :D

    SWGoH Ally Code: 988-869-147 GM of [Elite Casual]
    May the Force be with you.
  • StarSon
    7443 posts Member
    Options
    You all assume they didn't think about this, and are maybe just throwing us a bone. They know it will be difficult for most guilds to hit tier 7 ever (only very dedicated guilds can get it on mission and cantina days), so they gave us a freebie once a week. They also know that not everyone finishes GW every day.

    Either way, if this is not what they intended they will simply tweak the requirements. No point getting worked up over a system (GW resets) that has been in place since the start.
Sign In or Register to comment.