Tier the rewards so everyone gets something a little different
Not sure if this has been brought up or not, but it would be nice to acknowledge those who take 2-4th place. Right now they all get the same rewards which seems like a participation trophy to me. Any chance the rewards could be broken down even more would be nice in my opinion. even if that means boosting the 1st place rewards as well. Anyone else's thoughts?
0
Replies
They each did equal work, and had equal results.
A) That’s not clear at all since the best two could face each other in rounds 1 or 2.
1st = 3 wins
2nd = 2 wins- had to face the person who took 1st place and lost
3rd= also has 2 wins (one from the 1st round and 1 from the 3rd round)
4th place= 1 win from the first round only
if this is the case then why would 2nd-4th get the same rewards?
No, that’s not correct. 2-4 all have 2 wins. The groupings are determined by record and all 3 of those people finished with 2 wins and 1 loss.
okay, but only one of them played for first place, in return they take second place. 3rd and 4th (I'm assuming this because I have only taken 1st or 2nd) fought against one another which would make a clear 3rd and 4th place.
okay, but only one of them played for first place, in return they take second place. 3rd and 4th (I'm assuming this because I have only taken 1st or 2nd) fought against one another which would make a clear 3rd and 4th place.
[/quote]
Nope,
The tiers really should just be renamed to three wins, two wins, one win, zero win, That would stop all this nonsense about rewards changing and who beat who.
It’s really simple, You get three wins, you get “first “, You get two wins, (no matter how or what round) you get tier two, second thru four rewards. Etc . There is no second place or third or fourth. It’s just how many wins total for the three rounds. That’s it that’s all.
That's not necessarily true. Take my current GA for example. I'm one of the four 1-0 people going into this round. In this round, I've beaten another 1-0 person, so I'm 2-0, and he is 1-1. Next round, if he wins (and by roster and mods, I'd place money on it), he will be 2-1. Next round, I will fight someone who is 2-0. If I win, I will be 3-0 and that person will be 2-1. That person fought me and lost, just like my current opponent. Why should that person be ranked higher than my current opponent, with the same record, both having lost to the person who finishes first?