Matchups aren’t even close this time?

Replies

  • Options
    Just checking in to agree.

    I’m at 4.15. Next person is 4.6, with the range going all the way to 5.05. Absolute ****. And I’m the only one without Malak. I have no idea how this has been calculated.

    Best mode in the game ruined. Absolutely horrible tweak.
  • Options
    Here are the people in my matchup. There’s someone with 2.2M character GP and someone with 1.5M character GP.
    g7mweskf8lus.png
    z27um5mnl4mk.jpeg
    w3zusczv5ftp.jpeg
    ihhiigsq9ooi.jpeg
    aud4fvgrwdbq.jpeg
    gdpnvfndikab.jpeg
    0bfmbrhp1erv.jpeg
    lbndrwuahxom.jpeg
  • Ralakili
    104 posts Member
    Options
    Player GP varies from 1.25m to 1.68m in my round (I'm at 1.51m). Pretty big difference if you ask me. We are also from various divisions.
  • Options
    fjva7ev3djor.jpg
    I'm gonna get wrecked as well but that's life I suppose.
  • TVF
    36693 posts Member
    Options
    usArmyJedi wrote: »
    usArmyJedi wrote: »
    Last time the matchups in character GP were all very similar but this time I’ve got 200k difference lower and higher. I’ve heard others with 700k difference.

    The matchmaking formula isn't based upon GP any longer. It's supposed to be more based off the usable characters in GA, lowering the impact of lesser geared characters. So just looking at GP is pretty irrelevant now in terms of matchmaking.

    @Whatelse73 stated that he’s the only one in his matchups with DR

    This is nothing new. I've had this several times, including the cancelled GAC over the weekend.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • TVF
    36693 posts Member
    Options
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • Drewbee
    50 posts Member
    Options
    In the botched GAC all total GPs varied but all character only were within 1k. Today, the lowest in the bunch is 1.653k and the highest is 2.278k.

    Let's hope this is intentional to test out their new algorithm and not just "surprise mechanics".
  • flux_rono
    2135 posts Member
    Options
    ironically for me this time the matches seem "better" off. though im higher in gear 12 and zetas compared to the rest, but im lower in everything else..
    on another hand most still have either a D revan or traya while i dont :/

    last week it was bad for me going against a person with much better gear and stats, plus a person who had plus 20 on every stat compared to everyone else (stats being zetas, mods, gear tiers, ect)
  • Entus
    161 posts Member
    Options
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Im last in my division. My next closest os 500k more gp and has 50 more g12 and over 100 more 6 star mods. And he isnt even close to the top of the division who has everything maxed.

    I see no commonality here. Its just random. So.e players in my guild are fighting people in lower divisions. This is a straight up bug.
  • Options
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

  • Entus
    161 posts Member
    Options
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments
  • Dk_rek
    3299 posts Member
    edited June 2019
    Options
    4rch4nge1 wrote: »
    e3h3bh8mf71o.jpg

    you have 2 full G12 teams on him....... in this case I would say who cares that he has 600k GP on you.... you still have a 2 team advantage...that's a lot....unless your G12 are phoenix and his is Darth Malak and JKR
    usArmyJedi wrote: »
    Whatelse73 wrote: »
    usArmyJedi wrote: »
    usArmyJedi wrote: »
    Last time the matchups in character GP were all very similar but this time I’ve got 200k difference lower and higher. I’ve heard others with 700k difference.

    The matchmaking formula isn't based upon GP any longer. It's supposed to be more based off the usable characters in GA, lowering the impact of lesser geared characters. So just looking at GP is pretty irrelevant now in terms of matchmaking.

    @Whatelse73 stated that he’s the only one in his matchups with DR

    I will say though, for character GP, we are within 100K of 2.4 mil except one guy who has 2.7 mil GP, but he's got a very fluffy roster (even a couple of his jawas are G12).

    So, tough call, look at character-only GP and see how that looks for you.



    It’s quite a huge spread. And plus as stated above someone’s matched with a 600k difference :O

    yeah he is 600k down but he has TWO more full G12 teams he can field.... he is -600k but should easy crush the guy unless it's trash G12 vs malak and JKR
  • Lio
    1003 posts Member
    Options
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    This might be the best (most sensible) comment in the forum ever.
  • TVF
    36693 posts Member
    Options
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • Lio
    1003 posts Member
    Options
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    TRANSLATION: "I disagree with a very agreeable comment so that makes it dumb"
  • Options
    Entus wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Im last in my division. My next closest os 500k more gp and has 50 more g12 and over 100 more 6 star mods. And he isnt even close to the top of the division who has everything maxed.

    I see no commonality here. Its just random. So.e players in my guild are fighting people in lower divisions. This is a straight up bug.

    Can you show a screen shot of your group?
  • Brown89
    174 posts Member
    Options
    My group has a 2.51m character GP player and a 3.11m character GP. The overall GP difference is nearly 1m
  • Entus
    161 posts Member
    Options
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.

    Its because he doesnt know whats actually occuring. Its not reasonable.
  • TVF
    36693 posts Member
    Options
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.

    Its because he doesnt know whats actually occuring. Its not reasonable.

    You're gonna have to explain that one.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • Entus
    161 posts Member
    Options
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.

    Its because he doesnt know whats actually occuring. Its not reasonable.

    You're gonna have to explain that one.

    He said hell need to see evidence. Evidence was already posted. Need anything else?
  • TVF
    36693 posts Member
    Options
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.

    Its because he doesnt know whats actually occuring. Its not reasonable.

    You're gonna have to explain that one.

    He said hell need to see evidence. Evidence was already posted. Need anything else?

    Ok it's just the usual complaints then but with some GP complaining thrown in.
    I need a new message here. https://discord.gg/AmStGTH
  • Options
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.

    Its because he doesnt know whats actually occuring. Its not reasonable.

    You're gonna have to explain that one.

    He said hell need to see evidence. Evidence was already posted. Need anything else?
    All the evidence I’ve seen (ie actual bot comparisons) point to pretty even matchups.
  • Entus
    161 posts Member
    Options
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.

    Its because he doesnt know whats actually occuring. Its not reasonable.

    You're gonna have to explain that one.

    He said hell need to see evidence. Evidence was already posted. Need anything else?
    All the evidence I’ve seen (ie actual bot comparisons) point to pretty even matchups.

    The nnext closest guy to me has 50 more g12. Is that fair?
  • Options
    My extremely broad roster appears to have broken the algorithm. I'm in Division 1 and I'm paired with 7 Division 2 players. There's one other (very weak) Darth Revan, and some of the players don't even have Traya unlocked.

    I appreciate that I'm not facing an uphill battle for once, but this does seem to have swung a bit too far in the opposite direction. Hopefully they can dial it somewhere in the middle. My first round opponent has 65 less 10+ speed mods. Yikes.
  • Options
    1mbey963sx8f.png

    So I’m about in the middle of the 8... the only thing that’s kinda close is that we’ve got the same amount of zetas. Other than that... he’s about the bottom of the 8 and the dude that’s the top of the 8 is at 5.49m who will probably make me look like this guy vs me
  • Options
    Entus wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.

    Its because he doesnt know whats actually occuring. Its not reasonable.

    You're gonna have to explain that one.

    He said hell need to see evidence. Evidence was already posted. Need anything else?
    All the evidence I’ve seen (ie actual bot comparisons) point to pretty even matchups.

    The nnext closest guy to me has 50 more g12. Is that fair?
    No, not at all. Yours seems horrendous.

    Others have complained solely about GP differences, and some have posted bot comparisons that look fair.

    Yours is the only one that sounds like a complete mismatch.
  • Options
    Yeah I'm division 4 and all my opponents are division 3 averaging ~500k GP more. Close matchmaking aside, aren't we at least supposed to start in the same division? I have to battle d3 opponents, but will only get d4 prizes.
  • Entus
    161 posts Member
    Options
    Entus wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.

    Its because he doesnt know whats actually occuring. Its not reasonable.

    You're gonna have to explain that one.

    He said hell need to see evidence. Evidence was already posted. Need anything else?
    All the evidence I’ve seen (ie actual bot comparisons) point to pretty even matchups.

    The nnext closest guy to me has 50 more g12. Is that fair?

    Oh also, there are people in division 1 fighting people in division 2. Is that supposed to happen?
  • Options
    Entus wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    Entus wrote: »
    TVF wrote: »
    First they organized them by GP, and everyone complained because GP is such a terrible way to determined matchups. Then they change it, and people use GP to show how terrible they are.

    I’m not arguing one way or another against their matchmaking. But I need evidence beyond GP for why they are poor.

    Can we get this stickied?

    Only if were sticking the dumbest comments

    A fair rational post is dumb because it's not a rage post. Got it.

    Its because he doesnt know whats actually occuring. Its not reasonable.

    You're gonna have to explain that one.

    He said hell need to see evidence. Evidence was already posted. Need anything else?
    All the evidence I’ve seen (ie actual bot comparisons) point to pretty even matchups.

    The nnext closest guy to me has 50 more g12. Is that fair?

    Repeating the same thing without providing the requested proof just makes it look like you are making it up. Can you show us the screen shot of your matchup? Some of us would like to see what is going on and get a better idea of things.
Sign In or Register to comment.