I personally would like different clone companies and for CG to listen to the community. This discussion is meant for improvements on CGs end and content you'd like, not for slandering CG and their moderators or for saying dcs are bad (a fact everyone knows and nothing is done about).
2
Replies
Not gonna happen.
See above.
I know, its just about what you want, not what's plausible
Add challenge difficulty to Conquest where even whales and veterans get stuck partway through. Of course, the rewards would have to start where hard mode rewards end, and probably not give more shards to keep the cadence.
Add other challenging solo content, like endless mode or personal raids.
Make the web store not kick us out of the game when we buy something. The two phase authentication is enough, this is just an annoyance.
Actually listen to the community, including this thread.
I second this but...
I would say don't limit it to allies or even guild mates - enter ally code, then fight. I'd love to see this happen. I think it would do a lot for the longevity and life-span of the game. It would also open the door to community-curated events like ad-hoc, player/guild/CC sponsored tournaments and that kind of thing. It would also give us the opportunity to practice counters, and learn how to handle datacrons in TW and GAC. Let us toggle game mode flags to turn on or off the omicrons we want to test. There don't have to be any in-game rewards for this - it would be just playing the game for... you know... fun.
I think CG would be shocked at how much such a thing would increase player engagement in the game as a whole.
This is one of the best ideas I've heard
You just described like the best possible thing i could wish for (except for ship raids)
But... But... But...
Who paids for the servers to run the game? That's why there's "energy" to collect because CG doesn't want people playing the game all day, only when it is required and at a "limited" time so as to create a false sense of urgency.
How does CG get paid to run the game on the servers??
Right, @CG_Tusken_Meathead???
Sarcasm aside, love the idea and to get the Community involved with a positive spin (streaming matches, tournaments, etc) I am in favor of..
I am 3.7 mil GP with 9 g13s, and I have been matched with an opponent that's 6.3 mil GP with 47 g13s. The only determiner of if I win or lose is simply whether my opponent shows up or not. If he plays, I lose. If he doesn't, I guess I win, but I didn't actually get to compete. Skill has absolutely nothing to do with the outcome of this match.
A system that calls this a fair, "skill-based" match cannot possibly be considered anything but broken.
- preset fleet loadouts
- keep TB data/stats available to check for 24 hrs (same as TW stats)
- more ships
- [updated] in-game counter for the feats progression
However you slice it, the end result is broken all the same: I'm not matched against someone I can have a fair, competitive, enjoyable game with.
Another thing. Make alle marquess replayable
3rd thing Please make a remake for the HDB and let players with the original Bundle, buy the new one for a reduced price.
Want to see conquest and datacrons removed, fun new content added(tb and raids).
Want to see better UI for all things because even basic stuff cg messes up like the icons when the game is busy with guild events.
Want to see communication outside of swgoh events discord(where if you say anything negative meathead tells you to quit) or youtube channels with premeditated questions and a bunch of softball marketing ****.
Want to see the currently broken and unfair matchmaking systems both in tw and gac change to include things that were discussed alredy countless times.
Want to see lowered crystal cost for cantina energy or different energy for relic materials if cg intends to release characters to cantina node.
All in all the issues with the game would require a lot more time to write up because theres so many.
Is there anything you'd like to see added to the game that doesn't have to share space with a list of complaints? I'm pretty sure your post is the opposite of what the op was looking for.
I'm always open to listen to suggestions when folks tell me how bad I am :eyeroll:
? What do you mean by this? CG doesn't listen to the community normally so it's not like I expected any of these to be put into action. This was meant for the players to share ideas, not for CG to tell us no again.
The community wants a lot of things that I wouldn't give them either.
With that said I'll take fleet loadouts.
You told people not to slander CG in this thread and then you went ahead and did it yourself.