Can we finally get the *Sith* tag for Asajj Ventress now?
I know, I know, she not 'Sith." She's a (wait for it) [Sith] "Assassin." So can we have the tag now please?
For all you purists, *Sith* is a religion much like Jedi order. So it stands to reason that there are other people in the order than just the Lords of Sith (Darths of which there can only be two). Otherwise they wouldnt be much of a Lord. Not much has been written of their inner workings though.
For all you purists, *Sith* is a religion much like Jedi order. So it stands to reason that there are other people in the order than just the Lords of Sith (Darths of which there can only be two). Otherwise they wouldnt be much of a Lord. Not much has been written of their inner workings though.
0
Replies
reddit: /u/Capgasp
I don't reply to attacks or negativity. Keep it civil.
Like who?
C'mon, say it... please....
Thank you for an answer.
Tuskens
Lol
Can we leave this alone now
Yay!!! We have am answer, can we please stop beating this dead horse.
to later re-becoming a jedi
Why? I mean Savage Opress is not a Sith either but you made him a Sith
Grievious is not a DROID, is a living alien a Kaleesh but you did made him a Droid
You do not like Ventress? Do you hate her?
think as long as your "trained" aka knighted your a sith
as for Grievious it's more your interpretation some believe that when dooku shot him down Grevious died and was rebuilt as a droid
^^ this is why they don't respond much.lol you got the answer now let it go.
Thanks for the response. Its hard to tell what period of time her current version is from, but I can understand the logic.
With the release of "Sith Assassin" the question was resurrected. IE it brings a completely new reason to consider it. Or maybe more accurately, negates the main old reason against it. Apparently though her *current version* will not be considered Sith. Similar to Darth Sideous not being Empire.
I can argue with you on her Sith consideration until we are both blue in the face and neither will likely change our opinion, so I will not. If you want to PM me fine, but not trying to start that conversation here. Just my point of the new title, to which EA prefers to not consider her *current version* a Sith. Which depending on her timeline I agree with.
I think it's important to read into this more so than y'all are currently.
I think that the statement intentionally avoids the argument of *if* she was ever Sith and simply says that *this* version is not a Sith. Probably half of SW: TCW has her as Nightsister only. So her *current version* is easily taken from that portion of the show.
They do leave room to introduce another version of her though, but I doubt they will.