Asajj Ventress

BAST420 · August 20, 2017 4:19AM

I'm curious why Asajj Ventress isn't listed in the Sith section? I mean she is an evil force user. Force users are either Jedi or Sith. She was Count Dooku's Apprentice, which should make her a Sith. I personally would like to see her added to the Sith list on the character page.

Riffinator · August 20, 2017 4:20AM

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/comment/906698#Comment_906698
^this is why

Thor_Odinson1 · August 20, 2017 5:23AM

Madre de Dios.

This again?

EmeraldZx · August 20, 2017 5:38AM

Actually she was a SITH ASSASSIN. She has the same right to be Sith as sith assassin : \

wearywarrior74 · August 20, 2017 5:40AM

Riffinator wrote: »

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/comment/906698#Comment_906698
^this is why

Click that link.

Brimley_Ploom_88 · August 20, 2017 7:14AM

EmeraldZx wrote: »

Actually she was a SITH ASSASSIN. She has the same right to be Sith as sith assassin : \

this might be the best arguement ive ever seen, lol. this debate has raged on and on since day 1 almost 2 years now. but its always about interperating canon. this is a different arguement (or at least to me).

assaj, a sith assassin: no sith tag
sith assassin: sith tag

one could argue that assaj wasnt a sith assassin, she was an assassin used by the sith. a true sith is an apprentice of a master.

so...whos master is sith assassin/soldier?

Plank420 · August 20, 2017 4:17PM

+1 again asaaj should be sith

BAST420 · August 22, 2017 11:12PM

Brimley_Ploom_88 wrote: »

EmeraldZx wrote: »

Actually she was a SITH ASSASSIN. She has the same right to be Sith as sith assassin : \

this might be the best arguement ive ever seen, lol. this debate has raged on and on since day 1 almost 2 years now. but its always about interperating canon. this is a different arguement (or at least to me).

assaj, a sith assassin: no sith tag
sith assassin: sith tag

one could argue that assaj wasnt a sith assassin, she was an assassin used by the sith. a true sith is an apprentice of a master.

so...whos master is sith assassin/soldier?

Thank you, this is the only meaningful reply to this post.

And for all others that post link IS NOT an answer to the question. That was some mod, or a member of the dev team giving a lazy response to a reasonable question.
It does not in any way answer my question.

Damba_Ba · August 23, 2017 1:27AM

Sith assassin is from the time before the rule of 2 so she is definitely a sith. Ventress isn't from that time period (the only sith of her time were sid and dooku)

evanbio · August 23, 2017 3:20PM

Damba_Ba wrote: »

Sith assassin is from the time before the rule of 2 so she is definitely a sith. Ventress isn't from that time period (the only sith of her time were sid and dooku)

This. She was an assassin used by a Sith with some training in the dark side of the force. But not a "Sith".

Riffinator · August 23, 2017 4:42PM

BAST420 wrote: »

Brimley_Ploom_88 wrote: »

EmeraldZx wrote: »

Actually she was a SITH ASSASSIN. She has the same right to be Sith as sith assassin : \

this might be the best arguement ive ever seen, lol. this debate has raged on and on since day 1 almost 2 years now. but its always about interperating canon. this is a different arguement (or at least to me).

assaj, a sith assassin: no sith tag
sith assassin: sith tag

one could argue that assaj wasnt a sith assassin, she was an assassin used by the sith. a true sith is an apprentice of a master.

so...whos master is sith assassin/soldier?

Thank you, this is the only meaningful reply to this post.

And for all others that post link IS NOT an answer to the question. That was some mod, or a member of the dev team giving a lazy response to a reasonable question.
It does not in any way answer my question.

Actually it does, because of that post she will never be a sith.

capifico22 · August 23, 2017 4:58PM

A real sith wouldn't let a silly rule like the rule of two determine their fate

Riffinator · August 23, 2017 4:58PM

capifico22 wrote: »

A real sith wouldn't let a silly rule like the rule of two determine their fate

Then maybe she isn't a real sith

capifico22 · August 23, 2017 5:05PM

Riffinator wrote: »

capifico22 wrote: »

A real sith wouldn't let a silly rule like the rule of two determine their fate

Then maybe she isn't a real sith

Fosho

Mrjenkins · August 23, 2017 6:17PM

She could just as easily b bounty hunter

ExarTheKun · August 23, 2017 6:21PM

Everyone knows that Vitiate's spirit took over R2D2. He is the real hero of the rebellion, and continues to rule over the force.

Brimley_Ploom_88 · August 23, 2017 6:38PM

Damba_Ba wrote: »

Sith assassin is from the time before the rule of 2 so she is definitely a sith. Ventress isn't from that time period (the only sith of her time were sid and dooku)

So Sith Assassin is a sith because the rule of 2 doesnt apply to her...but what about Savage Opress, does it apply to him? Because he's a sith. Who was his master? I thought Darth Maul was his master. But how could that be if Darth Sidious was already a master at the same time?

Riffinator · August 23, 2017 6:40PM

Brimley_Ploom_88 wrote: »

Damba_Ba wrote: »

Sith assassin is from the time before the rule of 2 so she is definitely a sith. Ventress isn't from that time period (the only sith of her time were sid and dooku)

So Sith Assassin is a sith because the rule of 2 doesnt apply to her...but what about Savage Opress, does it apply to him? Because he's a sith. Who was his master? I thought Darth Maul was his master. But how could that be if Darth Sidious was already a master at the same time?

Maul and Savage were rule of two-ing at the same time until Sidious killed savage

Brimley_Ploom_88 · August 23, 2017 6:51PM

I thought the rule of two only allowed for 2 sith to exist at the same time. So since Sidious and Dooku fulfilled the rule of 2, Maul could not have been Savages master.

ZatyraJinn · August 23, 2017 6:51PM

In the clone wars she was mentiond and called sith by dooku

Liamtbqh · August 23, 2017 7:41PM

dooku also rejected her as his apprentice, theres another version of her after that which she becomes an official nightsister (in game) and after that she becomes a bounty hunter i believe

Riffinator · August 23, 2017 7:44PM

Brimley_Ploom_88 wrote: »

I thought the rule of two only allowed for 2 sith to exist at the same time. So since Sidious and Dooku fulfilled the rule of 2, Maul could not have been Savages master.

It wasn't an actual rule, as in more could exist

zombiwan_kenobi · August 23, 2017 8:10PM

Brimley_Ploom_88 wrote: »

I thought the rule of two only allowed for 2 sith to exist at the same time. So since Sidious and Dooku fulfilled the rule of 2, Maul could not have been Savages master.

Rule of two mostly helps with evil plots and secrecy. I don't think it prevents one Sith from claiming himself Sith lord and taking an apprentice, at least it didn't prevent Maul from doing it. This kind of rule also prevents egomaniac Siths from becoming lords, they're so crazy it would be a huge political mess.
In fact Sidious and Maul were ruling two different Sith orders. And Sidious didn't like it, at all.

Sidious wasn't aware Maul survived before he took Dooku as an apprentice so it was only a mistake.

Anyway rules are made to be broken.

Thelordslime · August 24, 2017 12:37AM

Going by what you said why isn't kylo a Sith then ?

Riffinator · August 24, 2017 12:37AM

Thelordslime wrote: »

Going by what you said why isn't kylo a Sith then ?

no

New player? Check out the new player index

Asajj Ventress

Replies

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links