Seeing as asajj was apprentice and assassin for Darth Tiranus, and that she worked as a bounty Hunter later in her life it would make sense to add those to her synergy list. Especially sith, though. Her skill set would be most welcome to the sith line up!
0
Replies
BH according to this definition doesn't fit either. That was later.
according to the tags they gave her this is the NS version.
So which "snapshot" of r2 did we get? All it this is, is more lightsde bias. If r2 can have galactic republic, rebel and resistance tags then there is no valid reason that asajj shouldn't have sith and bounty hunter tags.
If she has BH tag, I would be able to complete those BH missions in DS TB.
If his snapshot is from at the end of say TLJ, then he could consider himself any of those tags or all of them. All depends how he was programmed.... But I am just describing the tag process as the devs have.
But anyway, I don't know why they chose that tag for her or to dismiss other tags. But the statement they gave us is " this version of asajj will not get the with tag".
With R2 they left the camera shutter open for a much longer exposure.
It's a panoramic view.
Ventress however is not a sith, she does not practice its beliefs. She knows sith but she herself isnt one, using a red saber is not enough to qualify. Savage gets it because Maul (whi is a trained sith) attempted to train him properly and was an official apprentice to counter Palpatine under the rule of 2. Ventress knows nothing of how the rule of 2 works and thus is not a current sith
Nihilius knew nothing of the rule of 2 either. People read way too much into the rule of 2. Ventress was being trained in the ways of the force by a Sith Lord. That makes her Sith.
That is a very good argument... R2 is resistance, rebel and galactic republic... and empire and imperial trooper... sith and Jedi also... tusken.
Before you make the "But Maul and Savage!" argument, Maul was Palps original apprentice, then he died and Dooku became his new apprentice. Savage gets a Sith tag because Maul was following the rule of two when he took Savage as his apprentice and claimed to be the "true Sith Lord." Savage was not "Sith" under Dooku.
Such a confusing paragraph. So basically you're saying that if you're believed dead for 10 years, and return to train someone, they count as Sith. But if you're alive and well and working for the Sith, and you train someone, they don't count.
I think the sith assassin character proves that the two are not mutually exclusive
Different era of sith, different philosophy. So whilst not mutually exclusive, the point they made is that she is just an assasin, not a sith.
No. You should all remember this line. It was the first time we heard her speak! I don’t care what Dooku said, what the programmers said, or what affiliations R2-D2 were given in the game. She claimed to be Sith the very first time she spoke. She was also a bounty hunter. This is a stupid argument for two reasons. Everybody knows she was Sith. Everybody knows the programmers won’t change her affiliation. Try using the Force next time.
Besides she receives the red lightsabers from Dooku (at least in legends).
according to that.... why Commander luke dont have a jedi tag? he has done his training with yoda and obiwan? ahsoka was in her jedi training like luke and she have the jedi tag.....