It is unlikely that the banned account of his has returned. It’s a Chinese account, and SWGOH is on one of those games that is blocked in China (or just have its in game packs removed. Not sure which.)
Yeah we all know that.
The question has migrated to when will cg acknowledge they are actively letting whale cheaters back into the game after temp bans but still say they have a 0 tollerance policy.
0 tollerance = perma ban. They clearly arent doing that and re remaining silent on that issue
they absolutely need to address the leniency given to cheaters after claiming 0 tolerance. the title is misleading you to believe it's about Ahnald when it's really not.
Glad to see ArnaldT101 still being active on YouTube about the game despite his frustration with CG overlooking cheating. He's been a great resource for these latest Galactic Legends.
Makes one wonder who's fooling themselves after 106 pages.
Depends on if you believe that those commenting actually think cg will respond or that they should respond but wont?
Id like them to but i know they wont, so posting is just a frustration release
Cg may respond at some point or not, they may even be working on a new system for it. But I'm rather sure this topic won't effect any of it. It's existence probably did and they had internal talks.
@CG_Doja_Fett Could we ask for some clarification about @CG_LucifersDaddy shaddy business with confirmed chaters, which was first exposed by Bulldog, then by Ahnald, then by Bulldog again?
We do feel that this heavily contradicts CG's so called zero tolarence policy, but in the past 107 pages we couldnt get a single statement about this, so this negotiating issue actually evolved into a communication issue which is your field of expertise according to your introductions.
Any kind of feedback would be greatly appreciated from you, but of course "Friday Facts" do seem to be a nice idea as well.
@CG_Doja_Fett Could we ask for some clarification about @CG_LucifersDaddy shaddy business with confirmed chaters, which was first exposed by Bulldog, then by Ahnald, then by Bulldog again?
We do feel that this heavily contradicts CG's so called zero tolarence policy, but in the past 107 pages we couldnt get a single statement about this, so this negotiating issue actually evolved into a communication issue which is your field of expertise according to your introductions.
Any kind of feedback would be greatly appreciated from you, but of course "Friday Facts" do seem to be a nice idea as well.
I asked the same thing in the thread welcoming him. Sadly I do not think we will ever get anything from CG about what was happening.
This community is hoping for a change in the way of communication.
As this topic was handled is definitely a way, and a well characterized one. We hope for a change in that. If DF decides to remain silent, that is a legit choice too, although that would indicate for me, that there is no real, meaningful change coming.
They can launch a discordserver as well, but if the moderation/censorship is the same it wont do any good for them or to the community. "More of the same" is technically not equal to the "preivous state" (of a specified topic) but it is not a change either. And i am sure this community wants change.
Replies
Yeah we all know that.
The question has migrated to when will cg acknowledge they are actively letting whale cheaters back into the game after temp bans but still say they have a 0 tollerance policy.
0 tollerance = perma ban. They clearly arent doing that and re remaining silent on that issue
Sure, but how long ago was that?
lucky for you no one cares about your opinion nor controls what threads get merged together
Maybe I will find some breadcrumbs here and there
It was tried and you were there.
Perhaps kyno can just rename the thread instead of merges
this thread again
You were expecting it to be different when you clicked on it?
You are expecting something to go differently this time?
i was expecting that we were past this thread and moved on
BuT yOu'Re CoNtRiBuTiNg To KeEpInG iT oPeN
What's going on ?
Nope. You were just fooling yourself
Depends on if you believe that those commenting actually think cg will respond or that they should respond but wont?
Id like them to but i know they wont, so posting is just a frustration release
Cg may respond at some point or not, they may even be working on a new system for it. But I'm rather sure this topic won't effect any of it. It's existence probably did and they had internal talks.
Now it's just platitudes on a tomb.
@CG_Doja_Fett Could we ask for some clarification about @CG_LucifersDaddy shaddy business with confirmed chaters, which was first exposed by Bulldog, then by Ahnald, then by Bulldog again?
We do feel that this heavily contradicts CG's so called zero tolarence policy, but in the past 107 pages we couldnt get a single statement about this, so this negotiating issue actually evolved into a communication issue which is your field of expertise according to your introductions.
Any kind of feedback would be greatly appreciated from you, but of course "Friday Facts" do seem to be a nice idea as well.
I asked the same thing in the thread welcoming him. Sadly I do not think we will ever get anything from CG about what was happening.
As this topic was handled is definitely a way, and a well characterized one. We hope for a change in that. If DF decides to remain silent, that is a legit choice too, although that would indicate for me, that there is no real, meaningful change coming.
They can launch a discordserver as well, but if the moderation/censorship is the same it wont do any good for them or to the community. "More of the same" is technically not equal to the "preivous state" (of a specified topic) but it is not a change either. And i am sure this community wants change.