Darth Maul the new GL??

Sithari9
16 posts Member
edited June 10
Kenobi's major rival with metal legs and scoundrel synergy against the Galactic Republic.

Replies

  • Kiaowew
    13 posts Member
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.
  • Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.
  • Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.

    I guess you should prepare to use the same characters under Lord Vader then. Because he's definitely the one getting released next. They specifically name dropped him in Kenobi's kit insight post. He'll probably be more geared to work with Empire like Kenobi is geared to work with GR. And we have 2 Jedi GLs so why not 2 Sith GLs?
  • Sebek
    1965 posts Member
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.

    I guess you should prepare to use the same characters under Lord Vader then. Because he's definitely the one getting released next. They specifically name dropped him in Kenobi's kit insight post. He'll probably be more geared to work with Empire like Kenobi is geared to work with GR. And we have 2 Jedi GLs so why not 2 Sith GLs?

    Yes they said Lord Vader, because JMK fought against him, not because he is the next one. I also don't think it makes any sense, cause GLs are released in pairs from the opposing factions, like Rey vs Kylo is Resistance vs First Order, JML vs SEE is Jedi vs Sith, and if it's Lord Vader, the opposing factions would be what? Galactic Republic vs Empire, Galactic Republic vs Sith?
    Join the Dark Side, We Have Cookies.
    Join the Light Side, We Have Wookies.
  • Sebek wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.

    I guess you should prepare to use the same characters under Lord Vader then. Because he's definitely the one getting released next. They specifically name dropped him in Kenobi's kit insight post. He'll probably be more geared to work with Empire like Kenobi is geared to work with GR. And we have 2 Jedi GLs so why not 2 Sith GLs?

    Yes they said Lord Vader, because JMK fought against him, not because he is the next one. I also don't think it makes any sense, cause GLs are released in pairs from the opposing factions, like Rey vs Kylo is Resistance vs First Order, JML vs SEE is Jedi vs Sith, and if it's Lord Vader, the opposing factions would be what? Galactic Republic vs Empire, Galactic Republic vs Sith?

    Galactic Republic vs Sith actually does make sense if you think of the prequels. The whole story is the Sith overthrowing the Republic to make the Empire
  • Sebek
    1965 posts Member
    Sebek wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.

    I guess you should prepare to use the same characters under Lord Vader then. Because he's definitely the one getting released next. They specifically name dropped him in Kenobi's kit insight post. He'll probably be more geared to work with Empire like Kenobi is geared to work with GR. And we have 2 Jedi GLs so why not 2 Sith GLs?

    Yes they said Lord Vader, because JMK fought against him, not because he is the next one. I also don't think it makes any sense, cause GLs are released in pairs from the opposing factions, like Rey vs Kylo is Resistance vs First Order, JML vs SEE is Jedi vs Sith, and if it's Lord Vader, the opposing factions would be what? Galactic Republic vs Empire, Galactic Republic vs Sith?

    Galactic Republic vs Sith actually does make sense if you think of the prequels. The whole story is the Sith overthrowing the Republic to make the Empire

    Yeah, but we already have a Sith GL.
    Join the Dark Side, We Have Cookies.
    Join the Light Side, We Have Wookies.
  • Sebek wrote: »
    Sebek wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.

    I guess you should prepare to use the same characters under Lord Vader then. Because he's definitely the one getting released next. They specifically name dropped him in Kenobi's kit insight post. He'll probably be more geared to work with Empire like Kenobi is geared to work with GR. And we have 2 Jedi GLs so why not 2 Sith GLs?

    Yes they said Lord Vader, because JMK fought against him, not because he is the next one. I also don't think it makes any sense, cause GLs are released in pairs from the opposing factions, like Rey vs Kylo is Resistance vs First Order, JML vs SEE is Jedi vs Sith, and if it's Lord Vader, the opposing factions would be what? Galactic Republic vs Empire, Galactic Republic vs Sith?

    Galactic Republic vs Sith actually does make sense if you think of the prequels. The whole story is the Sith overthrowing the Republic to make the Empire

    Yeah, but we already have a Sith GL.

    Just saying they wouldn't do RoTS Kenobi and not make his counterpart RoTS Vader. The fanbase would never forgive them
  • Sebek
    1965 posts Member
    Sebek wrote: »
    Sebek wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.

    I guess you should prepare to use the same characters under Lord Vader then. Because he's definitely the one getting released next. They specifically name dropped him in Kenobi's kit insight post. He'll probably be more geared to work with Empire like Kenobi is geared to work with GR. And we have 2 Jedi GLs so why not 2 Sith GLs?

    Yes they said Lord Vader, because JMK fought against him, not because he is the next one. I also don't think it makes any sense, cause GLs are released in pairs from the opposing factions, like Rey vs Kylo is Resistance vs First Order, JML vs SEE is Jedi vs Sith, and if it's Lord Vader, the opposing factions would be what? Galactic Republic vs Empire, Galactic Republic vs Sith?

    Galactic Republic vs Sith actually does make sense if you think of the prequels. The whole story is the Sith overthrowing the Republic to make the Empire

    Yeah, but we already have a Sith GL.

    Just saying they wouldn't do RoTS Kenobi and not make his counterpart RoTS Vader. The fanbase would never forgive them

    I would love Lord Vader, but he doesn’t make sense GL-wise.
    Join the Dark Side, We Have Cookies.
    Join the Light Side, We Have Wookies.
  • crzydroid
    5635 posts Moderator
    Why can't there be two Sith GLs? We already had JML when JMK was dropped. Also, people were already using the same Jedi characters under both Rey and JML.
  • Kyno
    29899 posts Moderator
    crzydroid wrote: »
    Why can't there be two Sith GLs? We already had JML when JMK was dropped. Also, people were already using the same Jedi characters under both Rey and JML.

    There can be, and there will be. The empire GL will also be a Sith.
  • Kyno wrote: »

    There can be, and there will be. The empire GL will also be a Sith.

    This is getting out of hand! Now there are two of them?
    Officer in Ewoks Fit In Blenders. Traya, Wat & Negotiator on farm. PM to join us.
  • Kiaowew
    13 posts Member
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.


    we already have a Jedi legend, and yet we get Kenobi. Think about what you're writing.... Really, some people are too stupid
  • Gifafi
    5486 posts Member
    What will the playable GL Jabba be, kyno?
    Maybe End Game isn't for you
  • Sebek
    1965 posts Member
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.


    we already have a Jedi legend, and yet we get Kenobi. Think about what you're writing.... Really, some people are too stupid

    Yes, but Kenobi is a Galactic Republic GL not another Jedi one
    Join the Dark Side, We Have Cookies.
    Join the Light Side, We Have Wookies.
  • Xcien
    1064 posts Member
    Sebek wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.


    we already have a Jedi legend, and yet we get Kenobi. Think about what you're writing.... Really, some people are too stupid

    Yes, but Kenobi is a Galactic Republic GL not another Jedi one

    And Vader will be a Empire GL, not another Sith one.
    "Thank you for evaluating."
  • Xcien
    1064 posts Member
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.

    Maul makes 0 sense, given the context. The new DS GL will be someone from RotS, and Dooku, Vader, and Grievous are the only villains in that movie that don't already have a GL (looking at you, Sidious). But then, it has to be Kenobi's counterpart, so either GG or Vader. GG had no character growth, and never looked different (what would a GL GG look like, GG with a cape?) Vader seems to be the obvious choice, but we won't know for sure until it is announced. And for your two Sith GL issue, they just added a second Jedi GL. So, why not add a second Sith GL? And we also have a Kenobi that is both Jedi/GR. So it is possible, given our newest GL, Kenobi.
    "Thank you for evaluating."
  • Xcien
    1064 posts Member
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kenobi's major rival with metal legs and scoundrel synergy against the Galactic Republic.

    Scoundrel vs. GR makes no sense, even less than Empire vs. GR. I am sorry, but it is very unlikely that Maul would be the next GL. A Conquest character after CAT, yes, but a GL, no.
    "Thank you for evaluating."
  • Sebek
    1965 posts Member
    Xcien wrote: »
    Sebek wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.


    we already have a Jedi legend, and yet we get Kenobi. Think about what you're writing.... Really, some people are too stupid

    Yes, but Kenobi is a Galactic Republic GL not another Jedi one

    And Vader will be a Empire GL, not another Sith one.

    Which, atleast for makes it less likely he'll be the next GL, because Galactic Republic vs Empire
    Join the Dark Side, We Have Cookies.
    Join the Light Side, We Have Wookies.
  • Xcien
    1064 posts Member
    Sebek wrote: »
    Xcien wrote: »
    Sebek wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.


    we already have a Jedi legend, and yet we get Kenobi. Think about what you're writing.... Really, some people are too stupid

    Yes, but Kenobi is a Galactic Republic GL not another Jedi one

    And Vader will be a Empire GL, not another Sith one.

    Which, atleast for makes it less likely he'll be the next GL, because Galactic Republic vs Empire

    But Maul? Scoundrel vs. GR makes even less. It's going to either be GR/Empire or GR/Seps.
    "Thank you for evaluating."
  • Sebek
    1965 posts Member
    Xcien wrote: »
    Sebek wrote: »
    Xcien wrote: »
    Sebek wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.


    we already have a Jedi legend, and yet we get Kenobi. Think about what you're writing.... Really, some people are too stupid

    Yes, but Kenobi is a Galactic Republic GL not another Jedi one

    And Vader will be a Empire GL, not another Sith one.

    Which, atleast for makes it less likely he'll be the next GL, because Galactic Republic vs Empire

    But Maul? Scoundrel vs. GR makes even less. It's going to either be GR/Empire or GR/Seps.

    I'm not saying he will be, he probably should be a Epic Confrontation/Journey character. We'll see who is the next one
    Join the Dark Side, We Have Cookies.
    Join the Light Side, We Have Wookies.
  • Xcien
    1064 posts Member
    Sebek wrote: »
    Xcien wrote: »
    Sebek wrote: »
    Xcien wrote: »
    Sebek wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Sithari9 wrote: »
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Just not as a gl. Of course to Maul Kenobi was his main enemy, but to Kenobi he was a common opponent. JMK is based on RotS, not TCW. The in-game description and in kit reveal make it clear that the next GL will be Lord Vader. What's more, there is no any version of Anakin in the requirements for JMK, don't you think that proves something? The new Maul will be, but as a conquest reward after CAT.

    Anakin being the next GL makes absolutely 0 sense. We already have a Sith GL they will not make a second one. If they do, people would use all the same characters under a new leader. They can't make him Empire as the Republic literally is the Empire. They have no opposition. Lord Vader is both Sith and Empire. We already have a character named Vader that is both Sith and Empire.


    we already have a Jedi legend, and yet we get Kenobi. Think about what you're writing.... Really, some people are too stupid

    Yes, but Kenobi is a Galactic Republic GL not another Jedi one

    And Vader will be a Empire GL, not another Sith one.

    Which, atleast for makes it less likely he'll be the next GL, because Galactic Republic vs Empire

    But Maul? Scoundrel vs. GR makes even less. It's going to either be GR/Empire or GR/Seps.

    I'm not saying he will be, he probably should be a Epic Confrontation/Journey character. We'll see who is the next one

    Agreed. We will see.
    "Thank you for evaluating."
  • The problem with maul is what do you then give him? Anakin makes sense as he can have clone or empire synergy as well. I agree maul will be the conquest reward in the future as they said they are aiming for more s7 cw characters. I could see dooku being the character if they wanted to majorly overhaul seppies with a sith tag but anakin still makes the most sense. CAT and bad batch will probably be required since they are going to still be very new when GL6 comes, factor in something like r2 needing to be reliced along with mace and dooku and that's probably about the start of what we will see from him for requirements. No character in all of star wars is more deserving of GL then young Vader
  • I bet on a new Anakin it would make a little more sense than maul if they were to make him I think he’d be a 145 shard or 330 shard character but not a galactic legend you can see some small hints that are pointing more toward Anakin being the next GL than maul. I think they are trying to recreate the scene in ep III on Mustafar.
  • I think especially with CAT being the conquest reward maul is the only follow up that makes sense, unless of course they are pairing heroes with ships as we have with bam and razor so maybe they would give CAT the silver angel or whatever it was with the martez sisters maybe? But I think maul is more likely
  • Kyno
    29899 posts Moderator
    Gifafi wrote: »
    What will the playable GL Jabba be, kyno?

    I dont see that happening, but the only firm answer on a character we have is a no to Porkins.
  • Riggler
    21 posts Member
    edited June 11
    Why isn’t darth maul a requirement for JMK?
  • Kiaowew
    13 posts Member
    Riggler wrote: »
    Why isn’t darth maul a requirement for JMK?

    because he was already required under SEE.
  • Kisakee
    1461 posts Member
    Kiaowew wrote: »
    Riggler wrote: »
    Why isn’t darth maul a requirement for JMK?

    because he was already required under SEE.
    5s061dqe706x.jpeg
    d1lem1dg614p.jpeg
    You where saying?
    Never make the mistake of believing forbearance equates to acceptance, or that all positions are equally valid.
Sign In or Register to comment.