GAC scoring
If you take more than one attempt to beat a team, you should lose any chance at bonus points in GAC for protection, unused characters etc. if you can’t beat it first try, you don’t deserve to beat someone that beat the same amount of teams as you that did beat it on first try. The fact that I just lost a GAC matchup when I cleared the same amount of teams as my opponent on my first try and he took two tries on two of my opponents, means the scoring system is broken. Under no circumstance should this occur. You guys are a joke
0
Replies
So you think that just because someone lost 20 points on a battle, that you should win even though you lost more than 20 points across all battles? That is a joke.
It's not common sense at all. You did so poorly that someone who lost a battle was able to outscore you. Obviously, you aren't better. You limped by. That's how points work.
According to your logic, whoever loses the least amount of games in a season should be crowned champion, regardless of the competition they faced or who anyone else faced, because they lost less games so obviously they're the best.
Not sure what the problem is..
The problem is OP managed to play inefficiently enough that their opponent could make up for 2 extra battles, but feels entitled to a win despite performing worse according to the established scoring method.
Your opponent's kills were apparently far more clean than yours. Your victories were messy with lots of banners lost (dead or wounded characters). Yet you claim, that you performed better....oh, well......
It seems as if you really ought to care jow you yourself do in your battles. Just some friendly advice.
False. GAC is about allocating your roster resources and how decisive your victory is. If you lost to someone who lost battles on 2 matches, then you did a pretty weak job of winning your matches to allow them to make up that many points.
U L T R A S L O P P Y
and that's why you lost.
Also, you can earn 66 banners in the fleet battle pretty easily, so your opponent probably made up a bit of ground there.
False. It's about getting the most banners. You got fewer banners, because, again:
U L T R A S L O P P Y S A U C E
so you lost. That's all there is to it.
So you're saying someone who uses 4 people on offense should not get more points for the fight then someone who needed all 5 people to win the fight? If someone is capable of using undersized squads multiple times on offense that seems like a good sign that they know how to manage their roster.
The person who lost twice has a better understanding of the scoring system, and is therefore better.
Wrong max score on 2nd try is 44 points
Your scoring is off as DuneFlint pointed out. But regardless, look at it this way. All the individual "matches" you are referring to are collectively just one single match. Each individual battle is a round that makes up the match. Just like in boxing, you can lose one or two rounds and still win the match by winning more rounds than the other guy. So, you did win a few rounds, but your opponent won more rounds than you did and therefore won the match.