Thanks CG team, thanks CG_Puck for FINALLY fixing the Unending Loyalty bug, that's like the best news I've heard in a while lol
I know lots of people weren't really having issues because of this bug, but it was hell annoying, thank god it's gone!
Good job guys!
1
Replies
Which part of Executor’s kit (or unreleased support ship) was hitting multiple instances of triggering the unending loyalty bug? Some kind of ‘plague’ effect hitting under protection?
Or just instant cooldown of Boba’s AOE bomb?
Find out next time on Dragonball Z.
I think you hit the nail right on the head, protecting the new shiny toy is exactly the kind of motivation that works for CG. My guess is the Boba bomb, it's a way to improve his ship under Executor without actually changing it.
Good job guys![/quote]
Really? Hasn't that been a known bug for a couple of years?
Really? Hasn't that been a known bug for a couple of years? [/quote]
Indeed it has, it has been since the release of the Nego lol
Being known doesn't mean it does not need to be fixed, right?
You realize they only fixed this so more people will want to spend and get their new ship, right? Otherwise nego was beating it in their testing I'm sure.
Has it ever been higher?
it's certainly getting lower than it used to be.
Hey, at least there has to be some happy thing going on, huh? After all those nerfs coming, the fact that a GL like requirements ship (Executor) will be launched and ONLY will reward it at 4*
I need to find a needle to be happy about
I didn't realize how the timing of the announcement would trigger folks to theorize the fix only happened due to the arrival of Executor on the holotables. In hindsight, it's a bummer this was the reaction, but I understand how frustration can lead to speculation. So, it is what it is.
But I will say this; I am unaware of any aspect of Executor's kit and interactions that would affect it's status in the fleet meta due to the Unending Loyalty bug. It took so long to fix because it was like trying to shoot a rubber band gun and hit a fly in a rainstorm that would only appear during an eclipse in an odd numbered month.
Maybe not that difficult, but you get the point. It was a frustrating bug to fix, it was difficult to track down and reproduce, and I'm glad it's gone.
/salt
Seriously though, nice to see progress on some long standing bugs.
Wouldn't a competent coder recognize that the reason it wasn't fixed sooner was almost certainly because they were told to prioritize other tasks/projects/bugs rather than that they were incapable of fixing it?
This is what happens when you train your community to always expect the worst. You reap what you sow.
If you want more speculation - Conquest was delayed just as you announced several R8 requirements. What a weird coincidence.
(you as a company - not you personally Doja_Fett)
If "shooting a rubber band gun and hitting a fly in a rainstrom that would only appear during an eclipse in an odd numbered month" was a sport I would've been Olympic champion in this case...
So what you are saying is that CG doesn’t prioritize the players feedback or experience and disregards it almost completely? I’m shocked.
Many people experienced this bug daily, me being one of them. This bug has cost me crystals in fleet for years…and all we get is “it was hard, our bad”. No “hey, we know you guys had to deal with this bug for YEARS, here’s some crystals and some CWC shards for sticking around”.
I wonder who decided to stop any and all compensation over there….must of been after some “internal review”.
Rtt: its* 😏
“Have people it’s tried gitting gud?” Lol at your grammar.
I have raged over this bug for years, so it’s a sore spot for me.
Meanwhile I had it happening in 50% of the battles when I used the TIE fighter lineup against Ahsoka lineups in Nego mirrors.
I can understand the frustrations of trying to fix an intermittent bug, I've worked in software development (not as a coder) so I get the whole, this is the strategy of the company so make these changes and leave that bug/ tech debt till later.
This, I guess they won't fix it unless Lord Vader has a hard time beating JMK.
I already reported in EA Answers, they gave a generic answer and then ignored it.