I am not asking for much: I am asking for some sort of communication or statement. Not leave the poor mods to sweep the dirt under the rug while the company running the game pretends not to listen to us because they have headphones on
I believe this conquest is hard enough for most of us without having yet another feat made harder by this discrepancy but hey, it’s not my place to decide.
It is theirs. Decide, communicate, act.
Yeah, they gonna reply you for sure, exactly on the same way they replied about the 3 consecutive Galactic challenges broken and bugged on a row....
I am not asking for much: I am asking for some sort of communication or statement. Not leave the poor mods to sweep the dirt under the rug while the company running the game pretends not to listen to us because they have headphones on
I believe this conquest is hard enough for most of us without having yet another feat made harder by this discrepancy but hey, it’s not my place to decide.
It is theirs. Decide, communicate, act.
Yeah, they gonna reply you for sure, exactly on the same way they replied about the 3 consecutive Galactic challenges broken and bugged on a row....
Which ones were those?
Starting on march 28th with BH and the 2 consecutive ones.
Ridiculous. I was able to complete this feat and sion died plenty of times while doing it. CG clearly changing things retroactively to keep people for getting Malgus. Need proof? Look no further than their refusal to fix the Dread feat immediately. CG is pathetic.
as a programmer, you should know that some programs are designed in such a way that some of the updates to a program, even text ones, might require you to restart the application
as a programmer, you should know that some programs are designed in such a way that some of the updates to a program, even text ones, might require you to restart the application
It is the same as what was stated as well..
If a text change need to restart conquest... a bug fix would have a higher chance of restart as well right?
The argument was that i didnt write the program, what do i know ?
I know i cannot prove 1+1=2. That realm of maths is beyond me. I only know that from my education this was so. And from the calculator i used it tells me so.
I didnt write the program, but from my experience and education, there is a difference between a text variable and a program viable.
And if changing a text variable requires a conquest restart, how much more a program viable ?
And if changing a text variable requires a conquest restart, how much more a program viable ?
Yeah I know it sounds silly to design a game mode where changing a text would require restarting the entire game mode
But given how interlinked the Global feats that I'm sure CG had tried to make it more loosely coupled and they weren't able to
Fortunately, text description being locked to requiring restarts to fix is a very low list of problems from an architecture view imo
Again, CG would know best, and requiring a restart to update texts is just my assumption and speculation based on past text fixes of conquest they have done
Maybe they do have the ability to change descriptions midway and they opted for waiting for the next conquest launch
Replies
Which ones were those?
Starting on march 28th with BH and the 2 consecutive ones.
Asked Meathead and he said:
"Both are meant to survive, the description will be correct in the next conquest"
Maybe they need a client update to change text or assets, whereas mechanics are server-related?
in the past conquest feats, that needed a text change, i believe the text changed required a new instance of conquest too
U say what ultra? Neh text changes don't generate money. This does. This they fix fast
fixing a marquee unit doesn’t require restarting conquest
so i don’t see what your point or correlation is
U sure, then how was the other bugs fixed?
Maybe I should explain further...
A text change won't cause conquest to fail. As all the logic are still in place.
However fixing a bug WILL cause the whole conquest to fail as the code / program logic is changed .
So if they can change/fix a bug, why not a text update?
It's program logic...
It is as simple as typing a text vs rewriting a program...
U can check it out on C programming or which ever program language u understand..
Though I think you are guessing.
Haha really, u really think I was guessing?? Good guess. Keep it up.
It is the same as what was stated as well..
If a text change need to restart conquest... a bug fix would have a higher chance of restart as well right?
Lets just summarise these things
The argument was that i didnt write the program, what do i know ?
I know i cannot prove 1+1=2. That realm of maths is beyond me. I only know that from my education this was so. And from the calculator i used it tells me so.
I didnt write the program, but from my experience and education, there is a difference between a text variable and a program viable.
And if changing a text variable requires a conquest restart, how much more a program viable ?
Let's keep it till here then
But given how interlinked the Global feats that I'm sure CG had tried to make it more loosely coupled and they weren't able to
Fortunately, text description being locked to requiring restarts to fix is a very low list of problems from an architecture view imo
Again, CG would know best, and requiring a restart to update texts is just my assumption and speculation based on past text fixes of conquest they have done
Maybe they do have the ability to change descriptions midway and they opted for waiting for the next conquest launch