How it is now is there is no benefit for going for a all jedi team other than team synergys.a sith team on the other hand, say with darth maul as leader has sith synergys plus bonuses vs Jedi.you would think Jedi would get a simaler benefit vs sith but apparently not
Hear are some buffs I think would be good eeth koth-stun move has a 90% vs sith enemies lumi-her leader ability now grants +10% evasion for Jedi vs sith and so on
0
Replies
He's got a point. If 2 can wreck the whole order and take over the galaxy, imagine what 5 could do.
Let's ignore the millions of clones that helped in that.....
That being said, Jedi are fine.
Then at least there'd be more variety against fighting the op sith ahha
Back to the original post I believe some Jedi Should have a anti Sith synergy depending how well they did against sith in lore. BTW I believe that they tried to balance jedi to much amongst themselves, there is no Jedi that you can say is MUCH harder hitting then any other Ahsoka to me is the one that hits hardest do to all the crite but I believe that attackers should have a obvious advantage in damage in comparison to other fellow jedi and as for other stats as well but I don't feel like writing so much but you get the point
True but in episode 1 Mal holds his own against 2 Jedi for quite a bit. In 2 Dooku takes out both anakin and obi wan before an eventual stalemate with Yoda. In fact the only 3 Jedi I know of (still watching clone wars and rebels) that actually defeat a sith is obi wan (Mal, Anakin/Vader), Anakin (Dooku, Sideous), and Mace (Sideous) and they are some of the most underwhelming Jedi in this game.
Take grevious for example, he has 10000s of jedi to practice hunting down and killing. Whereas Mace had how many in his lifetime? Plagueis (idk?), Sidious, Maul, Dooku? We know he did in fact have experience fighting Sidious once in his lifetime...but we saw how that turned out.
Obi Wan fought Maul and Savage at the same time 2 sith vs 1 jedi and he cut Savages arm off in the process
Jedi Luke should have some vs Sith bonus. Defeated Vader, defeated Sid. Maybe also dual synergy with Rebels.
Yea these are my thoughts too. I know they did it because of the number of available Jedi synergies vs Sith. But, having no anti-Sith toons despite lore repeatedly supporting it is kinda lame.
Do not forget Obi Wan's epic fight with Savage and Maul
Technically Vader defeated Sid. Though I suppose you could say that it was Luke that convinced him to.
Was waiting for this argument, but you answered it yourself.
I am not fully caught up on the new cartoon canon, so I wasnt aware.
High hopes for the young ben!
He used Adi Galia's Lightsaber after Savage killed her and his own lightsaber, he fought both at the same time and he cut Savages arm off. Look on youtube that fight is sick
Looking forward to this. I'm in season 3 now. Just finished the Savage and Ventress vs Dooku episode.
I have to disagree about Eeth Koth. He isnt the best at anything, but he is above average at everything: Speed, Damage, Health, Defense... I predict his +60 Defense means something soon as well.
I agree Plo Koon needs at least 25% Potency to be viable.
Kit Fisto being similar to Dooku is a double edged sword, because he also suffers from Pool Noodle syndrome (weak hits).
+1
Probably Yoda's doing. Got jealous and kicked out all the beefcakes. 'Size matters not'...
More likely a marketing technique for nerd appeal.
Kit Fisto looked pretty buff in his underwater battle in the Clone Wars.
On film, buffest Jedi was...Mace? Qui-Gon? Both 50+ years. Anakin, Obi Wan, Luke... Skinny and scrawny.
Only guy with muscles in all of Star Wars seems to be Jango Fett, and he isnt exactly Hulk Hogan.