The post that went up on Jan 25th had this text:
Wait no longer and see below for what’s scheduled for the next two Territory Wars.
It also was clearly labeled for 1/31 & 2/7.
This current TW pays out on 1/31, and the "1/31" didn't say "starts on 1/31". It just said "1/31".
However, the text was absolutely clear: this is for the NEXT TWO Territory Wars.
The first of those was same bonuses as last time - Ewoks, Troopers & Jawas. I wasn't sure if EA/CG had messed up by placing the payout date where the start date should be or whether they just moved the date forward, but whatever they did, it was absolutely clear that the SAME BONUSES were in play for the VERY NEXT TW.
Now I've planned the defense for my guild and written detailed instructions to give us the best chance for success. And what happens?
Everything EA/CG said was a lie.
Why do you do this? These bonuses are large enough to plan a whole defense around -
and I did! Why are you making me waste my effort? Sure, I could maybe have saved some time writing the defenses up in chat and the territory command notes, but the planning for the TW was done before I could have known.
This is messed up. This is messed up bad.
1
Replies
Current TW: https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/193796/territory-wars-1-28-2019
31/1 and 02/10: https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/193884/territory-wars-1-31-2-10
This post you are referencing states the dates
Those dates match the dates if the TW schedules we have, see here:
I know that last post is "unofficial" but we don't have the February calendar yet.
Where are they lying, or misleading you in any way?
Also here is the one talking about the 1/28 TW.
It's all here using the same reference each time consistently between the calendar and the post. Maybe it's me and I'm just not seeing how they could have offended you so.
Im only asking since wouldnt be first time active bonuses were not in details...
Yes it is.
Now to put out discord fires and pandemonium with 4 hours to go till lock in
If you write that on 1/25 and the next TW starts on 1/28, there's bound to be confusion. The "rage" (don't know why you call it rage) is because they flat out said something that wasn't true.
This is like arguing about whether next Friday means the one in 3 days, or that one is “this Friday” and next Friday is the 8th. Clearly since there was already a post about this TW, the second post was referring to the next two after that. And it even gave the dates. You might disagree with the semantics, but getting this upset about it is unnecessary.
The Friday analog is prefect!
There is no reason why back-to-back TWs shouldn’t be referenced in the same dev post.
Point being, I always look before I leap... just in case things aren’t as they seem. Communication can sometimes be fuzzy, and I can sometimes be distracted.