Please add a 24-hour Review Period for Territory Battles. Additionally, a stat for Combat Waves Completed for each Phase would be another very useful tool for Guilds
It's very frustrating after a TB ends that we can't review it. Guild Officers NEED to be able to review Territory Battles once they've concluded. This is common sense. It is a 6 day guild event. PLEASE ADD A 24 HOUR REVIEW PERIOD TO TERRITORY BATTLES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!!!!
Definitely! The stats are still available before the next TB, so why not let us review for 24 hours. Also, the special mission stats should be for completed and not attempted.
Another territory battle just finished, but as an Officer I don't know who participated in Phase 6 and who didn't since the instant TB ends, it disappears into oblivion.
GUILD OFFICERS NEED A 24-HOUR REVIEW PERIOD AFTER PHASE 6 OF TERRITORY BATTLE ENDS. This is simple and logical. Please add one ASAP!!!
...and another TB has finished, but our guild has no idea what our totals were for Phase 6.
CG: Add a 24-hour review period following the conclusion of Phase 6. This is so simple. I cannot understand the logic behind not having a period for Guilds to review Territory Battle. We shouldn't have to ask for this at all, let alone repeatedly.
Another territory battle finished and still no review period.
Game Devs need to put some thought into guild management features.
Access to limited history for TB, TW and raids by guild account would be nice and why can't we sort guild members alphabetically. Some data export tools would be nice.
Guild stability builds communities which aids player engagement. If players are happy they keep playing. Giving guilds better access to performance data can only help.
This is getting very frustrating. Another Territory Battle just finished, but as an Officer I have no idea how Phase 6 finished up because there is no review period.
PLEASE ADD A REVIEW PERIOD TO TERRITORY BATTLES or provide us with a reason why you won't. I submitted this when we had an opportunity to ask CG questions, but as usual it gets ignored
I'm very frustrated that after the first ever run of the new Geonosian Territory Battle there is no review period. As an officer I have no way of knowing who participated late and who was a no-show.
CG: PLEASE ADD A 24 HOUR REVIEW PERIOD TO ALL TERRITORY BATTLES
I've submitted this to the upcoming Developer Q&A again (Will there ever be a 24-hour review added to TB; if no, why not?).
I submitted this on the last one as well, but it didn't make the cut. I would appreciate if anyone from CG or Moderators could at least reply here to let us know that this forum does get monitored/checked...
Replies
Why Territory Wars got it and battles not??
GUILD OFFICERS NEED A 24-HOUR REVIEW PERIOD AFTER PHASE 6 OF TERRITORY BATTLE ENDS. This is simple and logical. Please add one ASAP!!!
CG: Add a 24-hour review period following the conclusion of Phase 6. This is so simple. I cannot understand the logic behind not having a period for Guilds to review Territory Battle. We shouldn't have to ask for this at all, let alone repeatedly.
Game Devs need to put some thought into guild management features.
Access to limited history for TB, TW and raids by guild account would be nice and why can't we sort guild members alphabetically. Some data export tools would be nice.
Guild stability builds communities which aids player engagement. If players are happy they keep playing. Giving guilds better access to performance data can only help.
PLEASE ADD A REVIEW PERIOD TO TERRITORY BATTLES or provide us with a reason why you won't. I submitted this when we had an opportunity to ask CG questions, but as usual it gets ignored
CG: PLEASE ADD A 24 HOUR REVIEW PERIOD TO ALL TERRITORY BATTLES
I submitted this on the last one as well, but it didn't make the cut. I would appreciate if anyone from CG or Moderators could at least reply here to let us know that this forum does get monitored/checked...
I have submitted this question again to the upcoming Developer Q&A. @CG_RyDiggs, @CG_SBCrumb, @CG_CapGaSP, @CG_JohnSalera, @CG_Carrie: Any reply to this would be appreciated.