AND you did it mid-Conquest. Don’t change the rules during the game. And I swear Ultra, if you come in and say that we should have expected this and planned around it, like you did when they did the Nerfs mid GAC, I’m going to go nuts.
And I swear Ultra, if you come in and say that we should have expected this and planned around it, like you did when they did the Nerfs mid GAC, I’m going to go nuts.
And I swear Ultra, if you come in and say that we should have expected this and planned around it, like you did when they did the Nerfs mid GAC, I’m going to go nuts.
Ultra is going to find it hard to resist.
Shouldnt have threatened Ultra with a good time eh?
So they clarified the data disk description so that people aren't misled (that it can be stacked)
I don't understand your complaint, OP?
Does this mean they don't stack between multiple data disks, or multiple out of turn attacks no longer inflict the corresponding exposes? There is a huge difference, and if they changed the functionality to be the latter, then it is a huge deal.
So they clarified the data disk description so that people aren't misled (that it can be stacked)
I don't understand your complaint, OP?
Does this mean they don't stack between multiple data disks, or multiple out of turn attacks no longer inflict the corresponding exposes? There is a huge difference, and if they changed the functionality to be the latter, then it is a huge deal.
So they clarified the data disk description so that people aren't misled (that it can be stacked)
I don't understand your complaint, OP?
Does this mean they don't stack between multiple data disks, or multiple out of turn attacks no longer inflict the corresponding exposes? There is a huge difference, and if they changed the functionality to be the latter, then it is a huge deal.
THIS was my complaint. I believed that it no longer stacked with itself, IE, scenario 2. Was I wrong? If so, I'll eat crow for jumping the gun.
I see not stacking, ESPECIALLY with how precise CG is with language (they wrote a whole essay on "has protection but not Taunt" with JMK), I thought not stacking with itself.
Replies
Shouldnt have threatened Ultra with a good time eh?
It's just the bit in brackets that has been added. They haven't stacked all Conquest AFAIK, it's just the wording that has been adjusted.
I don't understand your complaint, OP?
HOW DARE THOSE MONSTERS DO THIS TO US
Does this mean they don't stack between multiple data disks, or multiple out of turn attacks no longer inflict the corresponding exposes? There is a huge difference, and if they changed the functionality to be the latter, then it is a huge deal.
Correct, all they did was update the wording to match what it was already doing.
Multiple disks.
THIS was my complaint. I believed that it no longer stacked with itself, IE, scenario 2. Was I wrong? If so, I'll eat crow for jumping the gun.
what's the worst that could happen