Nobody is locking you out man - of course if you are sharing a payout time of some of our members why would we let you take First instead of having someone with his payout 2 hours later attack you 5 min before payout??
We don't want to lose 200crystal because of no teamwork..
Don't take Krash words to the letter lol
@TZangetsu14 we have 15+ member on the same arena shard - most of them are in top 10 - his 'drama' comes from the fact he have to fight all of us to get decent rewards.
BTW before joining CL I used to take First 2 out of 3 days even if I had 4-5 opponents with the same payout. So you can do it also WrathofCrappus, I believe in you man!! Go live your dream and lock that 1st position.
I'll take Krashs' words for what they are, the simple truth. You collude to keep anyone else out of top ranks rather than letting them earn those spots by putting good teams together. Then you threaten to continue doing so unless they join you.. it's all here in this thread
Nobody is locking you out man - of course if you are sharing a payout time of some of our members why would we let you take First
"We"? You know the meaning of PvP right? You simply turned this into Guild vs Player. And somehow trying to defend the idea. This might not be against the rules of the game, but it is most definitely a lousy tactic. And don't expect respect or understanding from anyone.
Also, please keep in mind that when we started playing this game the guild was birthed on the shard and gradually expanded. 14/49 members are on the shard and only 12 are in top 20 regularly. For all of us it's still a fight. Amongst those 12, we have probably 6 different payouts varying greatly around the globe. We don't NEED anyone from our shard to join us. It was simply an offer to you, as it was months ago in the posting I've mentioned above.
About what happened today:
I was 18th, bumped to 23; I then fought you and bumped you to 23 from 17, you then bumped me to 23 again, quickly refreshed, and hit another member out of 12th.
Nobody is locking you out man - of course if you are sharing a payout time of some of our members why would we let you take First
"We"? You know the meaning of PvP right? You simply turned this into Guild vs Player. And somehow trying to defend the idea. This might not be against the rules of the game, but it is most definitely a lousy tactic.
Also, please keep in mind that when we started playing this game the guild was birthed on the shard and gradually expanded. 14/49 members are on the shard and only 12 are in top 20 regularly. For all of us it's still a fight. Amongst those 12, we have probably 6 different payouts varying greatly around the globe. We don't NEED anyone from our shard to join us. It was simply an offer to you, as it was months ago in the posting I've mentioned above.
About what happened today:
I was 18th, bumped to 23; I then fought you and bumped you to 23 from 17, you then bumped me to 23 again, quickly refreshed, and hit another member out of 12th.
Not sure what you're expecting here
This isn't about today... this has absolutely nothing to do with a single day.
Edit: and I don't know why you're trying to imply that it is, Krash made it quite clear what this is about... thanks for proving collusion btw. If it were just pvp I wouldn't be here but your guild "strategy" defeats the purpose of the pvp aspect. But even without Krashs' admission it's not like it isn't obvious to anyone who reaches top 10 in "our" shard
Nobody is locking you out man - of course if you are sharing a payout time of some of our members why would we let you take First
"We"? You know the meaning of PvP right? You simply turned this into Guild vs Player. And somehow trying to defend the idea. This might not be against the rules of the game, but it is most definitely a lousy tactic.
Appreciate the support against this type of thing
Ok just gonna clarify : by WE i mean other members with the SAME payout as Crappus - explain to me why they would not engage him to secure their position instead of letting Crappus engage them 2min before their payout???
It's like saying it's ok for him to try to take a top 5 place for payout but not ok for our member with the same payouy time lol.
Like I said : Man the f*** up and go take first and lock it out - like I did for months against Cantina Lord before joining them.
Some game of thrones stuff going on here.. While it sucks that there is a system like this.. this is real life right?.. jobs and such are acquired by the big people you know and they control that field... isn't that why everyone kisses **** in college and their bosses at work?.. having said that.. I'm rooting for you wrath! Take down the empire maybe you can round up some rebels to help your cause. Can't completely hate the stratagy though.. and much like the meta every 2 months.. you got to beat them by making a team like them probably
Nobody is locking you out man - of course if you are sharing a payout time of some of our members why would we let you take First
"We"? You know the meaning of PvP right? You simply turned this into Guild vs Player. And somehow trying to defend the idea. This might not be against the rules of the game, but it is most definitely a lousy tactic.
Appreciate the support against this type of thing
Ok just gonna clarify : by WE i mean other members with the SAME payout as Crappus - explain to me why they would not engage him to secure their position instead of letting Crappus engage them 2min before their payout???
It's like saying it's ok for him to try to take a top 5 place for payout but not ok for our member with the same payouy time lol.
Like I said : Man the f*** up and go take first and lock it out - like I did for months against Cantina Lord before joining them.
Your member should be able to hold his rank on his own, or re earn it. Your member shouldn't need his guilds assistance to take a top rank
Nobody is locking you out man - of course if you are sharing a payout time of some of our members why would we let you take First
"We"? You know the meaning of PvP right? You simply turned this into Guild vs Player. And somehow trying to defend the idea. This might not be against the rules of the game, but it is most definitely a lousy tactic.
Appreciate the support against this type of thing
Ok just gonna clarify : by WE i mean other members with the SAME payout as Crappus - explain to me why they would not engage him to secure their position instead of letting Crappus engage them 2min before their payout???
It's like saying it's ok for him to try to take a top 5 place for payout but not ok for our member with the same payouy time lol.
Like I said : Man the f*** up and go take first and lock it out - like I did for months against Cantina Lord before joining them.
If it was "Player vs Player" only than ok. But from beginning to this point when you clearly clarified that you work "together" against single "players" to keep your Guildies on top, than it became "Guild vs Player" and there is nothing to defend in this. It is simply the cheapest (and saddest) tactic I've ever heard on SW-GoH.
As mentioned before, while this is not against the rules, by both your "language" and "cheap tactics" it is just lousy.
It's quite simple Wrath, if you were a member of this guild you wouldn't be complaining about the players you lock out fo the top 10... Since you're not, you want a chance of getting top 10 by asking them not to block you anymore...
As i see you got 2 options, remain solo fighting against them and get blocked out of top 10... OR make a deal with them and get the crystals.
It's only natural guildmates will help each other to reach the top and remain there.... Maybe you could say it's unfair, but again, would you still say that and be against it if you were a part of that guild?
It's quite simple Wrath, if you were a member of this guild you wouldn't be complaining about the players you lock out fo the top 10... Since you're not, you want a chance of getting top 10 by asking them not to block you anymore...
As i see you got 2 options, remain solo fighting against them and get blocked out of top 10... OR make a deal with them and get the crystals.
It's only natural guildmates will help each other to reach the top and remain there.... Maybe you could say it's unfair, but again, would you still say that and be against it if you were a part of that guild?
I tried to reach an agreement, they refused to discuss it. And I wouldn't be a part of a guild that operated this way, imo it's an exploit at best and straight cheating at worst.
Nobody is locking you out man - of course if you are sharing a payout time of some of our members why would we let you take First
"We"? You know the meaning of PvP right? You simply turned this into Guild vs Player. And somehow trying to defend the idea. This might not be against the rules of the game, but it is most definitely a lousy tactic.
Appreciate the support against this type of thing
Ok just gonna clarify : by WE i mean other members with the SAME payout as Crappus - explain to me why they would not engage him to secure their position instead of letting Crappus engage them 2min before their payout???
It's like saying it's ok for him to try to take a top 5 place for payout but not ok for our member with the same payouy time lol.
Like I said : Man the f*** up and go take first and lock it out - like I did for months against Cantina Lord before joining them.
If it was "Player vs Player" only than ok. But from beginning to this point when you clearly clarified that you work "together" against single "players" to keep your Guildies on top, than it became "Guild vs Player" and there is nothing to defend in this. It is simply the cheapest (and saddest) tactic I've ever heard on SW-GoH.
As mentioned before, while this is not against the rules, by both your "language" and "cheap tactics" it is just lousy.
Tharivol - its player versus player - during their payout other members are working or sleeping - so there is no **** tactic.
The main point is that what Wrath is stating is false, he his simply losing to people with the same payout as him - its a coincidence that they are all part of the same guild.
And BTW pretty sure that Wrath finished below top 20 today instead of usual top 5 - so he didn't even tried
**** Crappus is 14th - let's go guild, lets kick him lower and lock him out of top 20 - gogogo
Knock yourselves out, at least when I take a rank I know I took that rank vs a half a guild. I don't need any assistance to do so
Best and fair way would be to contact EA/CG to just change their servers, but since that's a huge task, just contact them to change your own server mate. Customer support will fix you up probably. (Asking to change reset time due to Real Life would do the trick)
Let the cowards do what they do best.
Nobody is locking you out man - of course if you are sharing a payout time of some of our members why would we let you take First
"We"? You know the meaning of PvP right? You simply turned this into Guild vs Player. And somehow trying to defend the idea. This might not be against the rules of the game, but it is most definitely a lousy tactic.
Appreciate the support against this type of thing
Ok just gonna clarify : by WE i mean other members with the SAME payout as Crappus - explain to me why they would not engage him to secure their position instead of letting Crappus engage them 2min before their payout???
It's like saying it's ok for him to try to take a top 5 place for payout but not ok for our member with the same payouy time lol.
Like I said : Man the f*** up and go take first and lock it out - like I did for months against Cantina Lord before joining them.
If it was "Player vs Player" only than ok. But from beginning to this point when you clearly clarified that you work "together" against single "players" to keep your Guildies on top, than it became "Guild vs Player" and there is nothing to defend in this. It is simply the cheapest (and saddest) tactic I've ever heard on SW-GoH.
As mentioned before, while this is not against the rules, by both your "language" and "cheap tactics" it is just lousy.
Tharivol - its player versus player - during their payout other members are working or sleeping - so there is no **** tactic.
The main point is that what Wrath is stating is false, he his simply losing to people with the same payout as him - its a coincidence that they are all part of the same guild.
And BTW pretty sure that Wrath finished below top 20 today instead of usual top 5 - so he didn't even tried
I actually finished 14th, where I still currently am.
Replies
I'll take Krashs' words for what they are, the simple truth. You collude to keep anyone else out of top ranks rather than letting them earn those spots by putting good teams together. Then you threaten to continue doing so unless they join you.. it's all here in this thread
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/91565/cantina-lords-haat-guild-recruiting
This!
Move along, move along!
Wow for someone that gets into this much trouble to stay on top, that's a fun thing to say to others. Oh the irony..
"We"? You know the meaning of PvP right? You simply turned this into Guild vs Player. And somehow trying to defend the idea. This might not be against the rules of the game, but it is most definitely a lousy tactic. And don't expect respect or understanding from anyone.
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/comment/831031#Comment_831031
Also, please keep in mind that when we started playing this game the guild was birthed on the shard and gradually expanded. 14/49 members are on the shard and only 12 are in top 20 regularly. For all of us it's still a fight. Amongst those 12, we have probably 6 different payouts varying greatly around the globe. We don't NEED anyone from our shard to join us. It was simply an offer to you, as it was months ago in the posting I've mentioned above.
About what happened today:
I was 18th, bumped to 23; I then fought you and bumped you to 23 from 17, you then bumped me to 23 again, quickly refreshed, and hit another member out of 12th.
Not sure what you're expecting here
Appreciate the support against this type of thing
This isn't about today... this has absolutely nothing to do with a single day.
Edit: and I don't know why you're trying to imply that it is, Krash made it quite clear what this is about... thanks for proving collusion btw. If it were just pvp I wouldn't be here but your guild "strategy" defeats the purpose of the pvp aspect. But even without Krashs' admission it's not like it isn't obvious to anyone who reaches top 10 in "our" shard
Ok just gonna clarify : by WE i mean other members with the SAME payout as Crappus - explain to me why they would not engage him to secure their position instead of letting Crappus engage them 2min before their payout???
It's like saying it's ok for him to try to take a top 5 place for payout but not ok for our member with the same payouy time lol.
Like I said : Man the f*** up and go take first and lock it out - like I did for months against Cantina Lord before joining them.
Jaheez
Your member should be able to hold his rank on his own, or re earn it. Your member shouldn't need his guilds assistance to take a top rank
If it was "Player vs Player" only than ok. But from beginning to this point when you clearly clarified that you work "together" against single "players" to keep your Guildies on top, than it became "Guild vs Player" and there is nothing to defend in this. It is simply the cheapest (and saddest) tactic I've ever heard on SW-GoH.
As mentioned before, while this is not against the rules, by both your "language" and "cheap tactics" it is just lousy.
As i see you got 2 options, remain solo fighting against them and get blocked out of top 10... OR make a deal with them and get the crystals.
It's only natural guildmates will help each other to reach the top and remain there.... Maybe you could say it's unfair, but again, would you still say that and be against it if you were a part of that guild?
Do we have people out of top 20? Lol
Im calling at all my fellow guildies to bump me out of top 20 so i can try wrath's team. I can't do it from 2nd position!!!
Knock yourselves out, at least when I take a rank I know I took that rank vs a half a guild. I don't need any assistance to do so
Lol
I tried to reach an agreement, they refused to discuss it. And I wouldn't be a part of a guild that operated this way, imo it's an exploit at best and straight cheating at worst.
Tharivol - its player versus player - during their payout other members are working or sleeping - so there is no **** tactic.
The main point is that what Wrath is stating is false, he his simply losing to people with the same payout as him - its a coincidence that they are all part of the same guild.
And BTW pretty sure that Wrath finished below top 20 today instead of usual top 5 - so he didn't even tried
Why don't you take a cpl toons out and make it easier for them, we both know you're familiar with the "tactic"
Best and fair way would be to contact EA/CG to just change their servers, but since that's a huge task, just contact them to change your own server mate. Customer support will fix you up probably. (Asking to change reset time due to Real Life would do the trick)
Let the cowards do what they do best.
I actually finished 14th, where I still currently am.