Community Territory Wars Poll Results [MEGA]

Replies

  • Silent1018 wrote: »
    1.5 hours in, and 7 pages of pure denial and hatred for this, and CG is no where to be heard from....

    Not true. We have been reminded about the TOS in a few ways

  • @CG_SBCrumb the fan base would def appreciate a formal reply. There has been nothing but negative feedback and we have been very critical of these changes and yet you all went ahead with them anyway. Some sort of explanation or justification is needed. This is the most disappointing game change that has happened and I suffered through modgate!!!
  • Ryanodo wrote: »
    Silent1018 wrote: »
    1.5 hours in, and 7 pages of pure denial and hatred for this, and CG is no where to be heard from....

    Not true. We have been reminded about the TOS in a few ways

    Touché sir...Touché
  • how i miss john salera. that guy actually knew how to make some stuff
  • Stupid ideas, what do you expect
  • I'm not in favor of this at all, my guild has struggled to get members to either join or participate, this is going to be bad for us all around....to keep TW fresh and fun, why not do 4v4 or 3v3 instead?! It's hard enough for us when we are going against guilds 10M in gp over us too.
  • Ryanodo wrote: »
    Silent1018 wrote: »
    1.5 hours in, and 7 pages of pure denial and hatred for this, and CG is no where to be heard from....

    Not true. We have been reminded about the TOS in a few ways

    To be fair that's from forum mods not CG. They are just doing their job, your ire should be saved for the decision makers.
  • No_Try
    3667 posts Member
    Huh, how is this directly related to P2P? Assuming that TW matchmaking works decently you will meet worthy opponents which will also have to play it with hands tied to their back anyway. It's no different than 3 vs 3 GA, theory craft and enjoy.
  • Crumb said that it seemed like the characters that people voted to get rid of are the ones that are difficult to deal with in PVP. Don’t you see the problem here? The guilds that really like TW are going to gear everything towards PVP. They’re going to focus on those squads to the exclusion of others. You’re punishing the ones that really like TW. Ok, this helps the people that are horrible at TW and don’t like it, but it’s not going to get them to like it, either. Why alienate those of us that do?

    I’ve already voiced my concerns about you invalidating our efforts and our expenditures (which I think you’d want to reward so as to promote more spending and keep us playing) but I felt that since our concerns are being ignored, I need to give even MORE reasons why this is such a horrible idea. I doubt it will make a difference. But I really do like this game, and I don’t want to see it ruined. Please. Use my knowledge. I beg you.
  • Gth
    279 posts Member
    Time to find a new game .
  • Save the anger for elsewhere
    Leader: Grey Area 51 - My Squads: https://swgoh.gg/p/716522998/
  • Absolute garbage! Why did I level and gear certain toons to just sit n watch? Horrible idea, no reason to stay top tier guilds anymore! Finally, I’ll save some money. Introducing Galatic Areana where no battles ever take place.
  • They've added platoons to TW and we all know how everyone loves platoons.
  • #1 - the post says very clearly: "The Territory Wars after this one will have a different structure"....the initial post about the polling says: "We are planning to roll out many new types of Territory Wars in the future, but for the next Territory War, we’re giving the community the ability to shape what it looks like!" It's one TW....we'll survive, it's not the end of the world. #2 - this belongs in the mega thread and doesn't warrant it's own thread.
  • PeterBahama
    337 posts Member
    edited January 10


    You're over thinking it, acting as if the only mode that exists or matters is TW ignoring everything else like: GA, Arena , TB, raids, events and what's to come in the future. TW actually suck too, way too underwhelming with the exception of Zetas which basically the only difference is 1 extra for the win. On top of that it's not like you're being at a disadvantage so you'll win less anyways.
    Post edited by Sunnie1978 on
  • Hey CG.....
    zcre9rwdu84m.jpg
  • How is this not directed at anyone who has focus farmed or payed for a specific character. Hence the word, precedent is they can choose to do this to other game modes. What it you geared your NS teams specifically for arena, and CG says NS are removed from arena competition this week. The point of focus gearing and farming is the enjoyment of using them in whatever game mode you have purposed them for. To remove weeks or months of gearing and farming is reckless, regardless of game mode it is. In this case, why penalize more organized guilds who structured their farms and synergies with those who didn’t. It penalizes those who used resources and focus to achieve their rosters. Just my opinion.
  • If they are going to remove toons for this TW they should also remove the GP those toons provide in the matchmaking equations. That is upwards of 400k GP per guild member if you have all 20 of those toons fully geared and could be the difference of 20m GP in some guilds.
  • From a financial stand point too...

    Can we say “ Slaughtered the Golden Goose”?

    Reassign your Devs to Dragon Age 4 guys, you’re gonna need a new title.
  • No_Try
    3667 posts Member
    Let's get caught up in the hyperbole and exit milky way all together.
  • It’s gonna be a freaking race to throw everyone on defense ASAP in my guild so no one has to bother trying to attack with broken roster. Thanks for nothing CG
  • I just spent 250.00 on Revan and he’s been neutered...


    WHERE ARE MY CHEWIE SHARDS?!?’
  • Simply amazing , Just when I thought there is no way that TW could not be any more stupid or a waste of time... CG proves me wrong again.

    Way to go... love the fact that we level and collect these characters so that they are usless and unavailable for the events (in the game). You guys continue to amaze...
This discussion has been closed.